淬火介质对42CrMo钢棒淬火组织及硬度影响的数值模拟及试验验证

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.01.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于有限元计算分析了直径为ø40 mm的42CrMo钢圆棒试样分别使用淬火油和PAG水基液淬火后试样不同位置的组织、硬度以及淬火过程中的温度变化,采用硬度检测和显微组织分析对模拟结果进行了验证。结果表明,当使用淬火油淬火时,试样表面由奥氏体向马氏体和贝氏体转变,心部由奥氏体向贝氏体转变;当使用PAG水基液淬火时,试样表层几乎转变成马氏体,心部转变成马氏体和贝氏体;试样经淬火油和PAG水基液淬火后,表面硬度分别为58和55 HRC,均由表面至心部硬度逐渐降低,但使用PAG水基液淬火后试样的心部硬度比用淬火油的高5 HRC,约为50 HRC。

关键词: 42CrMo钢, 有限元分析, 淬火介质, 组织, 硬度

Abstract: Based on finite element method, the microstructure, hardness and temperature changes at various positions of ø40 mm 42CrMo steel round rod specimens were analyzed when the specimens quenched by quenching oil and PAG aqueous solution respectively, and the simulation results were verified by hardness test and microstructure analysis.The results show that the surface microstructure of the specimens changes from austenite to martensite and bainite, and the core microstructure changes from austenite to bainite. Using PAG aqueous solution quenching, the surface microstructure of the specimen is almost transformed into martensite, and the core into martensite and bainite. After quenching by quenching oil and PAG aqueous solution, the surface hardness of the specimens is 58 and 55 HRC respectively, and the hardness decreases gradually from the surface to the core. After quenching by PAG aqueous solution, the hardness of the specimen is about 50 HRC, which is 5 HRC higher than that by quenching oil.

Key words: 42CrMo steel, finite element method, quenching media, microstructure, hardness

中图分类号:

TG156.32

张文, 朱百智, 黄振建, 王兆华. 淬火介质对42CrMo钢棒淬火组织及硬度影响的数值模拟及试验验证[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(1): 56-60.

Zhang Wen, Zhu Baizhi, Huang Zhenjian, Wang Zhaohua. Numerical simulation and experimental verification of effect of quenching medium on quenching microstructure and hardness of 42CrMo steel rod[J]. HTM, 2020, 45(1): 56-60.

参考文献

[1]赵雯, 岳晓丽, 陈慧敏, 等. 42CrMo钢调质处理后力学性能的预测[J]. 金属热处理, 2017, 42(7): 158-162.
Zhao Wen, Yue Xiaoli, Chen Huimin, et al. Prediction of mechanical properties of 42CrMo steel after quenching and tempering treatment[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2017, 42(7): 158-162.
[2]陈康, 左秀荣, 李源, 等. 调质处理对低碳微合金钢组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2014, 39(9): 5-9.
Chen Kan, Zuo Xiurong, Li Yuan, et al. Effects of quenching and tempering on microstructure and mechanical properties of low-carbon microalloyedsteel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2014, 39(9): 5-9.
[3]王明娣, 刘东权, 武会宾. 淬火工艺对低合金耐磨钢组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(8): 156-161.
Wang Mingdi, Liu Dongquan, Wu Huibin. Influence of quenching on microstructure and mechanical properties of low alloy wear-resistant steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(8): 156-161.
[4]李亚欣, 刘雅政, 周乐育, 等. 石油套管淬火冷却中三维耦合场的有限元模拟[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2011, 32(1): 155-161.
Li Yaxin, Liu Yazheng, Zhou Leyu, et al. FEM simulation of 3-dimensional coupled field for oil casing in quenching process[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2011, 32(1): 155-161.
[5]沈智, 陈华, 张艳姝, 等. 300M钢制起落架锻后热处理工艺数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2017, 42(6): 185-190.
Shen Zhi, Chen Hua, Zhang Yanshu, et al. Numerical simulation of post-forging heat treatment process for 300M steel aircraft undercarriage[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2017, 42(6): 185-190.
[6]龚雪婷, 武志广, 李鑫, 等. 2.25Cr1Mo钢大型锻件热处理工艺数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(3): 192-197.
Gong Xueting, Wu Zhiguang, Li Xin,et al. Numerical simulation on heat treatment process of 2.25Cr1Mo steel large forgings[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(3): 192-197.
[7]郝震宇, 汪开忠, 胡芳忠, 等. 淬火介质对不同规格42CrMo钢组织及性能的影响[J]. 安徽冶金, 2016(4): 15-19.
Hao Zhenyu, Wang Kaizhong, Hu Fangzhong, et al. Effect of quenching medium on microstructure and mechanical properties of 42CrMo steel of different specifications[J]. Anhui Metallurgy, 2016(4): 15-19.
[8]汪正兵, 阮瑞杰, 米艳军, 等. 42CrMo钢齿圈毛坯的水-空交替控时淬火工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(9): 169-173.
Wang Zhengbing, Ruan Ruijie, Mi Yanjun, et al. Water-air alternative timed quenching process of 42CrMo steel gear ring blank[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(9): 169-173.
[9]任基重. 热处理中非稳态传热过程的计算方法[J]. 金属热处理, 1988, 11(1): 3-7.
Ren Jizhong. The calculation method of heat transfer process under unstable state in heat treatment[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 1988, 11(1): 3-7.
[10]杨跃辉, 蔡庆伍, 武会宾, 等. 两相区热处理工艺对9Ni钢性能的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2009, 30(3): 94-97.
Yang Yuehui, Cai Qingwu, Wu Huibin, et al. Effect of quenching, lamellarizing and tempering process on properties of 9Ni steel[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2009, 30(3): 94-97.
[11]Wang Xiaoli, Meng Qingshuai, Wang Zhou, et al. Prediction of the surface characteristic of 42CrMo after spot continual induction hardening based on a novel co-simulation method[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2019, 357: 252-266.
[12]Yang Junpeng, Cai Qi, Ma Zongqing, et al. Effect of W addition on phase transformation and microstructure of powder metallurgic Ti-22Al-25Nb alloys during quenching and furnace cooling[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(5): 1343-1351.
[13]Koistinen D P, Marburger R E. A general equation prescribing the extent of the austenite-martensite transformation in pure iron-carbon alloys and plain carbon steels[J]. Acta Materialia, 1959, 7(1): 59-60.
[14]Zhang Xing, Tang Jinyuan, Zhang Xuerui. An optimized hardness model for carburizing-quenching of low carbon alloy steel[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(1): 9-16.

[1]	王玉岱, 刘洋, 朱言言, 田象军, 程序, 冉先喆, 钱婷婷. 热处理对复合制造AerMet100超高强度钢组织均匀性与拉伸性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 1-9.
[2]	张子延, 陈君, 陈晓亚, 李全安, 刘建鑫. 固溶时效处理对Mg-4Sm-3Gd-0.5Zr合金显微组织和耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 10-16.
[3]	梁恩溥, 徐乐, 杨勇, 王毛球. 添加Al、Cu对40CrNi3MoV钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 17-23.
[4]	祁晓亮, 李岩, 定巍, 赵增武. 含Al中锰TRIP钢原始组织对临界退火后组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 24-29.
[5]	陈保安, 张静媛, 祝志祥, 韩钰, 潘学东, 张磊, 陈素红. 化学成分对高强Al-Mg-Si合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 30-38.
[6]	陈东俊, 李广阳, 刘刚. 时效处理对AlSi9Cu3压铸铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 53-56.
[7]	陈连生, 张露友, 田亚强, 杨子旋, 李红斌, 潘红波, 魏英立. 低碳高强舰船用钢的CCT曲线及其组织性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 63-68.
[8]	贾昌远, 霍元明, 何涛, 霍存龙, 刘克然. 40CrNiMo钢高温拉伸变形行为和组织演变规律[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 69-74.
[9]	王云龙, 余伟, 张昳, 史佳新, 李明辉. 奥氏体化温度对贝氏体钢等温转变及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 80-85.
[10]	刘丽艳, 毕文珍, 韦习成. Mn元素对热冲压钢镀锌层组织演变的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 93-99.
[11]	付锡彬, 陈子豪, 张可, 赵时雨, 孙新军, 朱正海, 梁小凯, 雍岐龙. 淬火温度对高Ti低合金耐磨钢组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 122-127.
[12]	宿鹏吉, 麻永林, 董丽丽, 杨雪峰. 磁场预退火处理对CGO钢组织与织构的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 128-132.
[13]	李立, 曾艳, 吴晓春. 4Cr5Mo2VCo钢的热处理工艺优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 133-140.
[14]	吕杰晟, 宋志刚, 何建国, 丰涵, 郑文杰, 朱玉亮. S32205双相不锈钢冷轧退火组织转变及强塑化机理分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 141-145.
[15]	王琪, 吴光亮. 回火温度对1100 MPa级高强钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 146-150.