金属材料喷雾淬火过程的界面热交换分析

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.06.006

金属热处理 ›› 2020, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 28-33.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.06.006

金属材料喷雾淬火过程的界面热交换分析

徐戎¹, 李落星^2,3

1. 湖南文理学院机械工程学院, 湖南常德 415000;
2. 湖南大学汽车车身先进设计制造国家重点实验室, 湖南长沙 410082;
3. 湖南大学机械与运载工程学院, 湖南长沙 410082

收稿日期:2019-12-12 出版日期:2020-06-25 发布日期:2020-09-02
通讯作者: 李落星,教授,博士,E-mail: llxly2000@163.com
作者简介:徐戎(1980—),男,讲师,博士,主要研究方向为材料压力加工先进制造技术,E-mail: samxurong@163.com。
基金资助:
湖南省教育厅科研项目(17C1085);湖南省自然科学基金(2018JJ2274);湖南省高等学校省特色学科(湘教通〔2018〕469)

Interfacial heat exchange analysis of metal materials during spray quenching process

Xu Rong¹, Li Luoxing^2,3

1. College of Mechanical Engineering, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde Hunan 415000, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha Hunan 410082, China;
3. College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha Hunan 410082, China

Received:2019-12-12 Online:2020-06-25 Published:2020-09-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过末端淬火试验,对铝合金试样喷雾淬火过程的界面热交换进行了研究。采用反热传导法求解了所有试验的界面热流密度(q)和界面传热系数(h),重点分析了喷雾压力、喷嘴直径和试样表面粗糙度对界面热交换的影响。结果表明:喷射压力对整个淬火界面换热过程均有影响,但对过渡沸腾阶段影响更大,且喷射压力越大,q及其峰值q_max越大,进入核沸腾阶段的时间越短;喷嘴直径越大,q、q_max越大,越早进入核沸腾阶段,但增大喷嘴直径对界面换热的影响存在上限;随表面粗糙度增大,q、q_max先减小后增大;在本试验条件下,上述喷射压力、喷嘴直径和表面粗糙度对界面热交换的影响规律均不受另外两个参数取值的影响。此外,由于喷射的微小液滴均匀覆盖了整个热表面,产生了剧烈的核沸腾,导致在部分试验中,q曲线在核沸腾阶段出现了二次升高现象。

关键词: 喷雾淬火, 界面热交换, 喷射压力, 喷嘴直径, 表面粗糙度

Abstract: The interfacial heat exchange of aluminum alloy during spray quenching process was studied by end quenching test. The interfacial heat flux (q) and interfacial heat transfer coefficient (h) of all the tests were solved by inverse heat conduction method. The influence of spray pressure, nozzle diameter and surface roughness on the interfacial heat exchange was analyzed. The results show that the spray pressure has an effect on the whole quenching interface heat transfer process, but it has a greater effect on the transition boiling stage. The larger the spray pressure, the larger the q and its peak q_max, and the shorter the time to enter the nucleation boiling stage. The larger the nozzle diameter is, the larger q and q_max are, and the earlier the nozzle enters the nucleation boiling stage. However, there is an upper limit on the effect of increasing the nozzle diameter on the interfacial heat transfer. With the increase of surface roughness, q and q_max decrease first and then increase. Under the experimental conditions, the effects of spray pressure, nozzle diameter and surface roughness on the interfacial heat exchange are not affected by the other two parameters. Under the experimental conditions, the influence of any of the above three parameters, i.e. spray pressure, nozzle diameter and surface roughness, on the interfacial heat exchange is not affected by the other two parameters. In addition, the second increase of q curve during the nucleation boiling stage is resulted in some experiments due to intense nucleation boiling caused by the sprayed droplets with very small diameter uniformly covering the whole thermal surface.

Key words: spray quenching, interface heat exchange, spray pressure, nozzle diameter, surface roughness

中图分类号:

TG379

徐戎, 李落星. 金属材料喷雾淬火过程的界面热交换分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(6): 28-33.

Xu Rong, Li Luoxing. Interfacial heat exchange analysis of metal materials during spray quenching process[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(6): 28-33.

参考文献

[1]Baleta J, Qi F S, Zivic M, et al. Numerical investigation of the transient spray cooling process for quenching applications[J]. Thermal Science, 2018, 22(5): 1943-1953.
[2]Hadala B, Malinowski Z, Telejko T, et al. Experimental identification and a model of a local heat transfer coefficient for water-air assisted spray cooling of vertical low conductivity steel plates from high temperature[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2019, 136: 200-216.
[3]Panda A, Pati A R, Pradhan S, et al. High mass flux air atomized spray with subcooled water: A novel methodology to enhance the heat transfer rate in film boiling regime[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018,120: 1287-1304.
[4]Aamir M, Liao Q, Hong W, et al. Transient heat transfer behavior of water spray evaporative cooling on a stainless steel cylinder with structured surface for safety design application in high temperature scenario[J]. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 53(2): 363-375.
[5]Nayak S K, Mishra P C, Ukamanal M, et al. Experimental result on heat transfer during quenching of hot steel plate by spray impingement[J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2018, 39(9): 739-749.
[6]Ying L, Gao T H, Dai M H, et al. Experimental investigation of temperature-dependent interfacial heat transfer mechanism with spray quenching for 22MnB5 steel[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 121: 48-66.
[7]姜鹏, 王谦. 喷雾淬火速率影响因素分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2016, 41(7): 145-149.
Jiang Peng, Wang Qian. Analysis on influencing factors of spraying quenching rate[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2016, 41(7): 145-149.
[8]Lin Y K, Zhou Z F, Fang Y, et al. Heat transfer performance and optimization of a close-loop R410A flash evaporation spray cooling[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 159: 1-7.
[9]Ali K, Amna R, Usman M, et al. An investigation of the influence of surface roughness, water quality and nozzle on spray cooling of aluminum alloy 6082[J]. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2019, 10: 280-286.
[10]Liu X F, Liu J H, Xue R, et al. Heat transfer optimization of R134a phase change spray cooling in a closed loop system[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2018, 92: 248-258.
[11]Pais M R, Chow L C, Mahefkey E T. Surface roughness and its effects on the heat transfer mechanism in spray cooling[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1992, 114(1): 211-219.
[12]Benjamin R J, Balakrishnan A R. Nucleation site density in pool boiling of saturated pure liquids: Effect of surface microroughness and surface and liquid physical properties[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1997, 15(1): 32-42.
[13]McHale J P, Garimella S V. Nucleate boiling from smooth and rough surfaces—Part 1: Fabrication and characterization of an optically transparent heater-sensor substrate with controlled surface roughness[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2013, 44(1): 456-467.
[14]McHale J P, Garimella S V. Nucleate boiling from smooth and rough surfaces—Part 2: Analysis of surface roughness effects on nucleate boiling[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2013, 44(1): 439-455.
[15]徐戎, 李落星, 王震虎. 铝合金喷雾淬火界面传热系数的反分析求解[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(10): 232-236.
Xu Rong, Li Luoxing, Wang Zhenhu. Determination of interfacial heat transfer coefficient of aluminum alloy during spray quenching based on inverse analysis method[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(10): 232-236.
[16]Zhang L Q, Li L X. Determination of heat transfer coefficients at metal/chill interface in the casting solidification process[J]. Heat Mass Transfer, 2013, 49(4): 1071-1080.

金属材料喷雾淬火过程的界面热交换分析

Interfacial heat exchange analysis of metal materials during spray quenching process

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	师佑杰, 李永刚, 李文辉, 王兴富. 深冷处理对TC4钛合金表面性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 183-187.
[2]	徐戎, 李落星. 介质流量密度对铝合金喷射淬火界面热交换率的影响规律及机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 243-249.
[3]	杨文灏, 鲍明东, 唐宾, 王钰鹏, 赵国华, 王帅康, 王铎. 表面粗糙度对磁控溅射纯Cu靶材刻蚀区表面形貌及溅射性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(8): 230-235.
[4]	杨玉, 王英海, 张吉富, 马小军, 徐立家, 任俊威. 45Mn钢件表面电镀霉斑的形成原因分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(4): 220-223.
[5]	韩培培, 权纯逸, 焦清洋, 陆莹, 赵栋, 乔红超, 赵吉宾. 激光冲击强化对7050-T7451铝合金残余应力和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(2): 190-195.
[6]	徐戎, 李落星. 工艺参数对铝合金强风冷过程界面换热效率的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(12): 276-281.
[7]	樊磊, 张仁奇, 李波, 王凌旭, 何锦航, 邹长飞, 梁宇. 水射流喷丸对渗碳钢表层组织与裂纹扩展性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(9): 129-133.
[8]	吕文博，张　海，张小敏，韩俊豪，宋晓庆，赵　武. 微粒子喷丸影响因素的数值仿真[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(1): 235-240.
[9]	贺瑞军，孙枫，王琳，佟小军. 钛合金离子渗氮表面完整性研究[J]. 金属热处理, 2017, 42(4): 77-81.
[10]	姜鹏1，王谦2. 喷雾淬火速率影响因素分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2016, 41(7): 145-149.
[11]	魏成富1,2，张兵1，唐杰2，郭建军1. 不同热处理对超精密加工镜面铝表面质量的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2015, 40(12): 78-82.
[12]	齐春雨1,2，王贺贺1，李远鹏1，江社明1，张启富1，俞钢强1. 热镀锌工艺对DP590钢板表面镀层性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2015, 40(10): 151-154.
[13]	刘晓初, 黄骏, 肖苏华, 何铨鹏, 萧金瑞, 谢碧洪. 喷射时间对GCr15钢轴承套圈表面粗糙度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2014, 39(7): 81-85.