固溶时效处理对8030铝合金导线组织性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.08.024

金属热处理 ›› 2021, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 125-132.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.08.024

固溶时效处理对8030铝合金导线组织性能的影响

韩茜^1,2, 李茂扬¹, 秦国飞¹, 李旭东¹, 董超¹, 张美丽^1,2, 代卫丽^1,2

1.商洛学院化学工程与现代材料学院陕西省尾矿资源综合利用重点实验室, 陕西商洛 726000;
2.商洛学院陕西省矿产资源清洁高效转化与新材料工程研究中心, 陕西商洛 726000

收稿日期:2021-03-24 出版日期:2021-08-25 发布日期:2021-12-09
作者简介:韩茜(1988—),女,讲师,硕士,主要研究方向为轻合金的热处理强化,E-mail:haohi2010@qq.com
基金资助:
商洛学院科学研究项目(18SKY018);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2019JQ-156);商洛市高性能有色金属制备与加工技术创新团队(SK2019-75)

Effect of solution treatment and aging on microstructure and properties of 8030 aluminum alloy conducting wire

Han Xi^1,2, Li Maoyang¹, Qin Guofei¹, Li Xudong¹, Dong Chao¹, Zhang Meili^1,2, Dai Weili^1,2

1. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Tailings Resources, Department of Chemical Engineering and Modern Material, Shangluo University, Shangluo Shaanxi 726000, China;
2. Shaanxi Engineering Research Center for Mineral Resources Clean & Efficient Conversion and New Materials, Shangluo University, Shangluo Shaanxi 726000, China

Received:2021-03-24 Online:2021-08-25 Published:2021-12-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了固溶时效处理对8030铝合金导线组织性能的影响。结果表明,未经热处理的8030铝合金导线由α-Al、Al₆Fe、Al₁₃Cu₄Fe₃、AlMg₂Zn相组成。经过480 ℃固溶处理6 h后,AlMg₂Zn相完全溶入基体,Al₁₃Cu₄Fe₃相及Al₆Fe相部分溶入基体。再经240 ℃时效处理6 h后,第二相重新析出。经固溶时效处理后,8030铝合金导线的导电率都有所提高,在480 ℃固溶处理6 h,再经240 ℃时效处理6 h后,其导电率最高达56.67%IACS,比未经热处理的合金导电率提高了3.41%。经固溶时效处理后,8030铝合金导线的伸长率显著提高,在480 ℃固溶处理6 h,再经200 ℃时效处理4 h后,伸长率从未经热处理的3.75%提高到31.25%。

关键词: 8030铝合金导线, 固溶时效处理, 显微组织, 导电率, 力学性能

Abstract: Effect of solution and aging treatments on microstructure and properties of the 8030 aluminum alloy wire was studied. The results show that the untreated alloy wire consists of α-Al, Al₆Fe, Al₁₃Cu₄Fe₃ and AlMg₂Zn phases. After solution treatment at 480 ℃ for 6 h, the AlMg₂Zn phase is completely dissolved into the matrix, while the Al₁₃Cu₄Fe₃ phase and Al₆Fe phase are partially dissolved. After aging treatment at 240 ℃ for 6 h, the second phases are precipitated again. After solution and aging treatments, the conductivity of the 8030 aluminum alloy wire is improved. After solution treated at 480 ℃ for 6 h and then aged at 240 ℃ for 6 h, the conductivity reaches up to 56.67%IACS, which is 3.41% higher than that of the alloy without heat treatment. After solution and aging treatments, the elongation of the alloy wire is significantly increased. When solution treated at 480 ℃ for 6 h and then aged at 200 ℃ for 4 h, the elongation is increased from 3.75% (untreated alloy) to 31.25%.

Key words: 8030 aluminum alloy conducting wire, solution treatment and aging, microstructure, conductivity, mechanical properties

中图分类号:

TG156.2

韩茜, 李茂扬, 秦国飞, 李旭东, 董超, 张美丽, 代卫丽. 固溶时效处理对8030铝合金导线组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(8): 125-132.

Han Xi, Li Maoyang, Qin Guofei, Li Xudong, Dong Chao, Zhang Meili, Dai Weili. Effect of solution treatment and aging on microstructure and properties of 8030 aluminum alloy conducting wire[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(8): 125-132.

参考文献

[1]王晓铮, 侯冬冬. 我国电线电缆行业现状与发展初探[J]. 山东工业技术, 2018(9): 165.
Wang Xiaozheng, Hou Dongdong. Preliminary study on the current situation and development of my country's wire and cable industry[J]. Shandong Industrial Technology, 2018(9): 165.
[2]陈憧. 中国有色金属供求平衡分析及其对策研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2016.
Chen Chong. Research on the analysis of supply-demand balance of Chinese nonferrous metals and countermeasures[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2016.
[3]黄崇祺. 电工用铝和铝合金在电缆工业中的应用与前景[J]. 电线电缆, 2013(2): 4-9.
Huang Chongqi. The application and development of aluminum and aluminum alloy for electrical purposes in cable field[J]. Electric Wire and Cable, 2013(2): 4-9.
[4]秦道广. 铝合金导体生产工艺探讨[J]. 山东工业技术, 2019(5): 205.
Qin Daoguang. Discussion on production technology of aluminum alloy conductor[J]. Shandong Industrial Technology, 2019(5): 205.
[5]戴雅康. 铜包铝线与“以铝节铜”[J]. 电线电缆, 2018(6): 1-3.
Dai Yakang. Copper clad aluminum wire and “saving copper with aluminum”[J]. Electric Wire & Cable, 2018(6): 1-3.
[6]戴雅康, 刘丕家. 铜包铝线缆再生利用的现状及建议[J]. 新材料产业, 2019(2): 55-58.
Dai Yakang, Liu Pijia. Current status and suggestions for the recycling of copper clad aluminum cables[J]. Advanced Materials Industry, 2019(2): 55-58.
[7]吴振江. 铝合金导体应用发展历程及现状[J]. 有色金属材料与工程, 2018, 39(4): 42-48.
Wu Zhenjiang. Development and situation of aluminum alloy conductor[J]. Non-ferrous Metal Materials and Engineering, 2018, 39(4): 42-48.
[8]牛艳萍, 杨勇, 唐维学, 等. 高强高导稀土铝合金导线的热处理工艺正交试验优化[J]. 中国金属通报, 2018(6): 120-122.
Niu Yanping, Yang Yong, Tang Weixue, et al. Orthogonal test optimization of heat treatment process for high-strength and high-conductivity rare earth aluminum alloy wire[J]. China Metal Bulletin, 2018(6): 120-122.
[9]杨莉, 陆冠华, 康跃华, 等. 时效工艺对Al-Mg-Si合金导线抗拉强度和导电率的影响[J]. 材料研究与应用, 2018, 12(1): 32-35.
Yang Li, Lu Guanghua, Kang Yuehua, et al. Effect of aging process on tensile strength and electrical conductivity of Al-Mg-Si alloy wires[J]. Materials Research and Application, 2018, 12(1): 32-35.
[10]倪艳荣. 人工时效对Al-Mg-Si铝合金导线导电性能和力学性能的影响[J]. 热加工工艺, 2018, 47(4): 185-187.
Ni Yanrong. Effects of artificial aging on conductivity and mechanical properties of aluminum alloy wire[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2018, 47(4): 185-187.
[11]林廷艺. 热处理工艺对铝合金电工圆杆析出相及性能的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2017.
Lin Tingyi. Effect of heat treatment process on precipitates and property of aluminum alloy electrical round rod[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2017.
[12]张保丰, 蔡海勇, 鲁中健, 等. 固溶和时效处理对Al0.6Fe0.25Cu合金冷拉拔导线组织和性能的影响[J]. 铸造技术, 2014, 35(11): 2547-2550.
Zhang Baofeng, Cai Haiyong, Lu Zhongjian, et al. Effect of solution treatment and aging on microstructure and properties of cold drawn Al0.6Fe0.25Cu[J]. Foundry Technology, 2014, 35(11): 2547-2550.
[13]李春和, 吴细毛, 王建东, 等. 时效温度对6201铝合金力学性能和电导率的影响[J]. 轻合金加工技术, 2014, 42(9): 39-43.
Li Chunhe, Wu Ximao, Wang Jiandong, et al. Effect of aging time on mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of 6201 aluminum alloy[J]. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology, 2014, 42(9): 39-43.
[14]段贺, 宋宁宁, 谭晖, 等. 铝合金杆退火对铝合金导线性能的影响[J]. 热处理技术与装备, 2015, 36(5): 53-55.
Duan He, Song Ningning, Tan Hui, et al. Effect of aluminum alloy rod under annealing on properties of aluminum alloy conductor[J]. Heat Treatment Technology and Equipment, 2015, 36(5): 53-55.
[15]李英, 韩茜, 雷兆隆, 等. 热处理工艺对AA8030铝合金导线组织性能的影响[J]. 轻合金加工技术, 2018, 46(5): 37-41, 61.
Li Ying, Han Xi, Lei Zhaolong, et al. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and properties of AA8030 aluminum alloy wire[J]. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology, 2018, 46(5): 37-41, 61.
[16]崔忠圻, 覃耀春. 金属学与热处理[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2013: 30-31.
[17]俞汉清, 陈金德. 金属塑性成形原理[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1999: 46-47.
[18]Li Y J, Arnberg L. Quantitative study on the precipitation behavior of dispersoids in DC-cast AA3003 alloy during heating and homogenization[J]. Acta Materialia, 2003, 51(12): 3415-3428.
[19]张国玲. 合金元素含量与加工工艺对8030铝合金导线性能的影响[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2012.
Zhang Guoling. The effects of alloying elements content and processing technology on properties of 8030 aluminum alloy[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2012.
[20]王学书, 聂波, 谢延翠, 等. 热处理制度对7075铝合金电导率的影响[J]. 轻合金加工技术, 2001, 29(7): 42-49.
Wang Xueshu, Nie Bo, Xie Yancui, et al. Effect of heat-treatment institution on conductivity of 7075 aluminum alloy[J]. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology, 2001, 29(7): 42-49.
[21]于洪伟, 李俊峰, 刘秀华. 热处理制度对6082铝合金电导率的影响[J]. 轻合金加工技术, 2002, 30(9): 12-14.
Yu Hongwei, Li Junfeng, Liu Xiuhua. Effect of heat-treatment institution on conductivity of 6082 aluminum alloy[J]. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology, 2002, 30(9): 12-14.

固溶时效处理对8030铝合金导线组织性能的影响

Effect of solution treatment and aging on microstructure and properties of 8030 aluminum alloy conducting wire

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张子延, 陈君, 陈晓亚, 李全安, 刘建鑫. 固溶时效处理对Mg-4Sm-3Gd-0.5Zr合金显微组织和耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 10-16.
[2]	梁恩溥, 徐乐, 杨勇, 王毛球. 添加Al、Cu对40CrNi3MoV钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 17-23.
[3]	祁晓亮, 李岩, 定巍, 赵增武. 含Al中锰TRIP钢原始组织对临界退火后组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 24-29.
[4]	陈保安, 张静媛, 祝志祥, 韩钰, 潘学东, 张磊, 陈素红. 化学成分对高强Al-Mg-Si合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 30-38.
[5]	陈连生, 张露友, 田亚强, 杨子旋, 李红斌, 潘红波, 魏英立. 低碳高强舰船用钢的CCT曲线及其组织性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 63-68.
[6]	王云龙, 余伟, 张昳, 史佳新, 李明辉. 奥氏体化温度对贝氏体钢等温转变及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 80-85.
[7]	骆再斌, 范子泽, 彭振. 轻质高熵合金的研究进展[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 100-107.
[8]	吕杰晟, 宋志刚, 何建国, 丰涵, 郑文杰, 朱玉亮. S32205双相不锈钢冷轧退火组织转变及强塑化机理分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 141-145.
[9]	王琪, 吴光亮. 回火温度对1100 MPa级高强钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 146-150.
[10]	孙凯, 陈研, 杨绍斌. 时效温度对激光选区熔化TC21钛合金微观组织及硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 155-158.
[11]	张骥俊, 邢彦锋, 曹菊勇. 超声振动对CMT电弧增材制造铝合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 159-164.
[12]	刘文彬, 乔龙阳, 潘新宇, 程格, 李爱娜, 裴新军. 淬火温度对刀剪用M390粉末冶金不锈钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 189-195.
[13]	王瑞琴, 葛鹏, 廖强, 侯鹏, 刘宇. 固溶冷却方式对短时用高温钛合金板材组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 196-198.
[14]	王绍灼, 孟晗, 王芬, 樊海卫, 李燕, 唐超. 改善低氧TC4-LC及重熔TC4钛合金性能的热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 204-207.
[15]	陈强, 陈林芳, 杨明华. 18CrNiMo7-6钢的可控气氛高温渗碳工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 231-239.