固溶处理时间对Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg铝合金型材组织及压溃性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.10.017

金属热处理 ›› 2021, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 101-107.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.10.017

固溶处理时间对Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg铝合金型材组织及压溃性能的影响

潘仁杰¹, 陈康敏¹, 郭辉^2,3, 范世通³

1.江苏大学材料科学与工程的学院, 江苏镇江 212013;
2.中南大学轻合金研究院, 湖南长沙 410083;
3.台山市金桥铝型材厂有限公司, 广东台山 529261

收稿日期:2021-04-28 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-12-08
通讯作者: 陈康敏,副教授,E-mail: kmchen@ujs.edu.cn
作者简介:潘仁杰(1996—),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为7×××系铝合金的组织与性能,E-mail:937350002@qq.com

Effect of solid solution time on microstructure and crushing performance of Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg aluminum alloy profiles

Pan Renjie¹, Chen Kangmin¹, Guo Hui^2,3, Fan Shitong³

1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang Jiangsu 212013, China;
2. Light Alloy Research Instiute, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083, China;
3. Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd., Taishan Guangdong 529261, China

Received:2021-04-28 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-12-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对汽车用Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg铝合金薄壁型材进行了470 ℃不同时间的固溶处理和双级时效处理,采用光学显微镜(OM)、EBSD测试、轴向静态压缩试验和室温拉伸试验等方法研究了晶粒组织和再结晶程度对其平均载荷(F_m)、峰值载荷(F_p)、吸能(U)等压溃性能的影响,同时分析了压溃变形特征和开裂原因。结果表明:随固溶时间的延长,铝合金型材的再结晶程度逐渐上升,强度逐渐下降,铝合金薄壁梁的峰值载荷、吸能及平均载荷也逐渐降低;在线水淬试样的峰值载荷和吸能分别为406 kN和33.3 kJ;经120 min固溶处理试样的压溃峰值载荷与吸能分别为359 kN和30.7 kJ,较在线水淬试样分别降低了11.5%和8.0%;当固溶较长时间时,铝合金试样再结晶程度显著升高,再结晶晶粒间一般为大角度界面,裂纹更易沿晶界扩展,试样更容易开裂。

关键词: 铝合金, 晶粒组织, 准静态轴向压溃, 吸能, 裂纹扩展方式

Abstract: Solid solution treatment at 470 ℃for different time and two-stage aging treatment for Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg aluminum alloy thin-walled profiles were carried out to investigate the effects of grain microstructure and recrystallisation on the crushing performance such as average load (F_m), peak load (F_p), energy absorption (U) by means of optical microscopy (OM), electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD), quasi-static axial crushing test and room temperature tensile test, and the characteristics of crushing deformation and the causes of cracking of the alloy were studied. The results show that the recrystallization degree of the aluminum alloy profiles increases with the solution time increasing, while the strength decreases gradually, and the peak load, energy absorption and average load of the aluminum alloy thin-walled beam also decreases gradually. The peak load and absorbed energy of the aluminum alloy profiles after online water quenching are 406 kN and 33.3 kJ, respectively. After solid solution treated for 120 min, the peak load and energy absorption are 359 kN and 30.7 kJ, which reduced by 11.5% and 8% compared with onhine water quenching, respectively. When solid solution for a long time, the recrystallization degree of the aluminum alloy profiles increases significantly, and the recrystallized grains are generally with large-angle grain boundaries along which the cracks are more likely to propagate, and the specimens are more likely to crack.

Key words: aluminum alloy, grain microstructure, quasi-static axial crushing, absorbed energy, crack propagation mode

中图分类号:

TG146.2

潘仁杰, 陈康敏, 郭辉, 范世通. 固溶处理时间对Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg铝合金型材组织及压溃性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(10): 101-107.

Pan Renjie, Chen Kangmin, Guo Hui, Fan Shitong. Effect of solid solution time on microstructure and crushing performance of Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg aluminum alloy profiles[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(10): 101-107.

参考文献

[1]胡海涛. 帽型薄壁梁抗弯性能研究及多目标优化[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2015.
Hu Haitao. A research on theoretical prediction method of energy absorption in bending and axial collapses of thin-walled beams with closed-hat section[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2015.
[2]张立玲, 林逸, 高峰. 不同材料薄壁圆管准静态轴压变形特性[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2010, 17(4): 62-65.
Zhang Liling, Lin Yi, Gao Feng. Axial collapsed behavior analysis of thin-walled circular tubes with different materials[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2010, 17(4): 62-65.
[3]Bilston D, Ruan D, Candido A, et al. Parametric study of the cross-section shape of aluminium tubes in dynamic three-point bending[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 136: 315-322.
[4]Pirmohammad S, Nikkhah H. Crashworthiness investigation of bitubal columns reinforced with several inside ribs under axial and oblique impact loads[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2018, 232(3): 367-383.
[5]Duan L, Jiang H, Geng G, et al. Parametric modeling and multiobjective crashworthiness design optimization of a new front longitudinal beam[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 59(5): 1789-1812.
[6]Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G, et al. On design of multi-cell tubes under axial and oblique impact loads[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 95: 115-126.
[7]Kathiresan M. Influence of shape, size and location of cutouts on crashworthiness performance of aluminium conical frusta under quasi-static axial compression[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 154: 106793.
[8]Sun H, Wang J, Shen G, et al. Energy absorption of aluminum alloy thin-walled tubes under axial impact[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, 30(7): 3105-3111.
[9]Rosefort M, Baumgart R, Matthies C, et al. Influence of microstructure on the folding behavior of crash relevant aluminum extrusion parts[C]//Light Metals 2014. Springer, Cham, 2014: 201-205.
[10]Nguyen-Hieu Hoang, Odd Sture Hopperstad. An improved nano-scale material model applied in axial-crushing analyses of square hollow section aluminium profiles[J]. Thin Walled Structures, 2015, 92: 93-103.
[11]张新明, 欧军, 刘胜胆, 等. 固溶制度对 1933 铝合金自由锻件组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2010, 20(1): 30-36.
Zhang Xinming, Ou Jun, Liu Shengdan, et al. Effects of solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of 1933 aluminum alloy forgings[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2010, 20(1): 30-36.
[12]王冠. 铝合金薄壁梁结构轻量化设计及其变形行为的研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2013.
Wang Guan. Lightweight design and deformation behavior of aluminum thin-walled structure[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2014.
[13]向东, 傅定发, 娄燕, 等. Al-Mg-Si多胞截面型材准静态轴向压缩[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2012, 22(7): 1843-1854.
Xiang Dong, Fu Dingfa, Lou Yan, et al. Quasi-static axial compression of Al-Mg-Si profiles with multi-cell section[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2012, 22(7): 1843-1854.
[14]王冠, 刘志文, 徐从昌, 等. 诱导孔对铝合金薄壁梁轴向压缩变形行为的影响[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2016, 26(3): 494-506.
Wang Guan, Liu Zhiwen, Xu Congchang, et al. Effect of cut-outs on aail collapse behavior of aluminum with thin-walled structure[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2016, 26(3): 494-506.
[15]Morere B, Ehrström J C, Gregson P J, et al. Microstructural effects on fracture toughness in AA7010 plate[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2000, 31(10): 2503-2515.
[16]Chen S, Chen K, Dong P, et al. Effect of recrystallization and heat treatment on strength and SCC of an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2013, 581: 705-709.

固溶处理时间对Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg铝合金型材组织及压溃性能的影响

Effect of solid solution time on microstructure and crushing performance of Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg aluminum alloy profiles

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈东俊, 李广阳, 刘刚. 时效处理对AlSi9Cu3压铸铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 53-56.
[2]	胡静, 陶科, 杨庆松, 李刚, 张德汉. 机械抛光后的时效工艺对0Cr25Al5电热合金拉拔性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 171-177.
[3]	杨春苗, 王珊, 王淑慧, 李延珍, 刘文文. RRA过程中预时效时间对7A85铝合金组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 44-47.
[4]	姜中涛, 汪鑫, 周志明, 林海涛, 杨绪盛, 代芳芳. 双级固溶工艺对7050铝合金组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 102-106.
[5]	叶拓, 唐明, 刘吉兆, 刘伟, 吴远志, 刘巍, 徐文. 固溶温度对7075铝合金板材组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 119-123.
[6]	叶拓, 何玉兵, 何文鹏, 刘巍, 袁浩登, 吴远志, 刘伟, 刘吉兆. 轧制态6082-T6铝合金的热压缩力学行为及微观组织分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 26-30.
[7]	禹鑫磊, 郑小平, 曹通, 田亚强, 陈连生. 等温温度对轧制SIMA法制备7075合金半固态显微组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 164-167.
[8]	李昂, 高坤元, 文胜平, 黄晖, 聂祚仁. 冷却条件对5E83铝合金搅拌摩擦焊接头组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 130-134.
[9]	王佳慧, 陈文浩, 张玉, 江卓奥, 王庆航, 赵玲玉. 喷射成形7055高强铝合金的热处理工艺优化及其应用[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 239-244.
[10]	李亚红, 戚小薇, 王锡鹏, 何芳. 2A12铝合金退火塑性低原因分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 290-294.
[11]	黄娟, 黄元春, 申振宇, 李湘粤, 曾渝, 杨庚辰. 终轧温度及退火温度对5052铝合金板材组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 79-84.
[12]	李骁, 程晓农, 徐桂芳, 杨成康, 陈乐利. 退火工艺对3003铝合金板微观组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 90-94.
[13]	丁轩, 甘玉荣, 蒋爱娟, 李辉, 杨明球. 时效处理对7A55铝合金微观组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 120-123.
[14]	宫浩, 孔德斌, 郭立娜, 韩洪文, 宫晶晶, 房洪杰. 中间退火处理对AlMgSiCu铝合金冷轧板组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 129-132.
[15]	师亚洲, 逯广平, 高翌, 廖承志, 杨屹. 脉冲磁场处理对7075铝合金性能及组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 159-163.