淬火低合金中碳钢的力学性能

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.02.026

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 172-178.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.02.026

淬火低合金中碳钢的力学性能

靳东亮^1,2, 王高峰³, 马喜强², 于伟涛⁴, 狄正贤⁵, 魏世忠^1,6

1.河南科技大学金属材料磨损控制与成型技术国家地方联合工程研究中心, 河南洛阳 471023;
2.龙门实验室, 河南洛阳 471023;
3.洛阳轴研科技有限公司, 河南洛阳 471039;
4.中信重工机械股份有限公司智能矿山重型装备全国重点实验室, 河南洛阳 471039;
5.洛阳理工学院, 河南洛阳 471023;
6.郑州轻工业大学材料与化学工程学院, 河南郑州 450000

收稿日期:2023-08-28 修回日期:2024-01-03 出版日期:2024-03-27 发布日期:2024-03-27
通讯作者: 魏世忠,教授,博士,E-mail: hnwsz@126.com
作者简介:靳东亮(1984—),男,讲师,博士,主要研究方向为先进钢铁材料,E-mail:ziranheping@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2020YFB2006805)

Mechanical properties of quenched low alloy medium-carbon steel

Jin Dongliang^1,2, Wang Gaofeng³, Ma Xiqiang², Yu Weitao⁴, Di Zhengxian⁵, Wei Shizhong^1,6

1. National Joint Engineering Research Center for Abrasion Control and Molding of Metal Materials, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang Henan 471023, China;
2. Longmen Laboratory, Luoyang Henan 471023, China;
3. Luoyang Bearing Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Luoyang Henan 471039, China;
4. National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Mining Heavy Equipment, CITIC Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., Luoyang Henan 471039, China;
5. Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology, Luoyang Henan 471023, China;
6. School of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou Henan 450000, China

Received:2023-08-28 Revised:2024-01-03 Online:2024-03-27 Published:2024-03-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过降低合金元素的含量设计一种低成本低合金中碳钢,研究了不同热处理工艺下的力学性能。通过控制总应变幅,对中碳钢的低周疲劳行为进行了探究。结果表明,在302 ℃盐浴淬火保温2 h后试验钢具有相对较高的抗拉强度,为957 MPa。随着盐浴淬火温度升高至312 ℃,抗拉强度下降,U型缺口冲击性能增加;再继续升高盐浴温度,冲击性能下降。随着盐浴保温时间的增加,试验钢的硬度呈下降趋势。高应变幅(0.80%)条件下,312 ℃盐浴淬火试验钢的初始硬化率较低;而302 ℃盐浴淬火具有较高强度马氏体的试验钢具有更高的低周抗疲劳强度和疲劳寿命。

关键词: 中碳钢, 淬火, 力学性能, 低周疲劳

Abstract: A low-cost low alloy medium-carbon steel was produced, and its mechanical properties were investigated. The low-cycle fatigue behavior of the tested steel was investigated by controlling the total strain amplitude. The results show that the tested steel salt bath quenched at 302 ℃ for 2 h has a relatively high tensile strength of 957 MPa. As the salt bath quenching temperature increases to 312 ℃, the tensile strength decreases, but the U-notched impact property increases, with the salt bath temperature further increasing, the impact property is reduced. The increase of salt bath holding time results in the decrease of hardness of the tested steel. Under high strain amplitude (0.80%), the initial hardening rate of the steel salt bath quenched at 312 ℃ is lower, while the tested steel with higher strength martensite salt bath quenched at 302 ℃ has higher low-cycle fatigue strength and fatigue life.

Key words: medium-carbon steel, quenching, mechanical properties, low-cycle fatigue

中图分类号:

TG161

靳东亮, 王高峰, 马喜强, 于伟涛, 狄正贤, 魏世忠. 淬火低合金中碳钢的力学性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 172-178.

Jin Dongliang, Wang Gaofeng, Ma Xiqiang, Yu Weitao, Di Zhengxian, Wei Shizhong. Mechanical properties of quenched low alloy medium-carbon steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(2): 172-178.

参考文献

[1]Liu M, Hu H, Kern M, et al. Effect of integrated austempering and Q&P treatment on the transformation kinetics, microstructure and mechanical properties of a medium-carbon steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2023, 869: 144780.
[2]Rementeria R, Morales-Rivas L, Kuntz M, et al. On the role of microstructure in governing the fatigue behaviour of nanostructured bainitic steels[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2015, 630: 71-77.
[3]Caballero F G, Santofimia M J, García-Mateo C, et al. Theoretical design and advanced microstructure in super high strength steels[J]. Materials & Design, 2009, 30(6): 2077-2083.
[4]Li Z D, Zhou S T, Yang C F, et al. High/very high cycle fatigue behaviors of medium carbon pearlitic wheel steels and the effects of microstructure and non-metallic inclusions[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 764: 138208.
[5]Li T, Zhong Y, Qu S, et al. Influences of the characteristics of carbide particles on the rolling contact fatigue life of rare earth modified, highly clean bearing steel[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2023, 143: 106888.
[6]Gao B, Tan Z, Liu Z, et al. Influence of non-uniform microstructure on rolling contact fatigue behavior of high-speed wheel steels[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 100: 485-491.
[7]Yang C, Liu P, Luan Y, et al. Study on transverse-longitudinal fatigue properties and their effective-inclusion-size mechanism of hot rolled bearing steel with rare earth addition[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2019, 128: 105193.
[8]Pashangeh S, Somani M, Banadkouki S S G. Microstructural evolution in a high-silicon medium carbon steel following quenching and isothermal holding above and below the Ms temperature[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2020, 9(3): 3438-3446.
[9]Li X, Shi L, Liu Y, et al. Achieving a desirable combination of mechanical properties in HSLA steel through step quenching[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2020, 772: 138683.
[10]张博涵, 李浩楠, 高鹏冲, 等. 分级淬火对高铬铸铁轧辊组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 15-20.
Zhang Bohan, Li Haonan, Gao Pengchong, et al. Effect of step quenching process on microstructure of high-Cr cast iron roll[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(7): 15-20.
[11]Cong T, Qian G, Zhang G, et al. Effects of inclusion size and stress ratio on the very-high-cycle fatigue behavior of pearlitic steel[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2021, 142: 105958.
[12]Li C, Dai W, Liu Y, et al. Effect of cooling condition on fatigue behavior of the forged EA4T steel[J]. Steel Research International, 2020, 91(9): 2000167.
[13]Hu Y, Guo L C, Maiorino M, et al. Comparison of wear and rolling contact fatigue behaviours of bainitic and pearlitic rails under various rolling-sliding conditions[J]. Wear, 2020, 460-461: 203455.
[14]Wang J, Qu S, Lai F, et al. Synergistic effects of a combined surface modification technology on rolling contact fatigue behaviors of 20CrMoH steel under different contact stresses[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2021, 153: 106487.
[15]Atreya V, Bos C, Santofimia M J. Understanding ferrite deformation caused by austenite to martensite transformation in dual phase steels[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2021, 202: 114032.
[16]Shewmon P. The thermal diffusion of carbon in α and γ iron[J]. Acta Metallurgica, 1960, 8(9): 605-611.
[17]龙晓燕. 中碳无碳化物贝氏体钢组织和性能研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2018.
[18]Zhou Q, Qian L, Meng J, et al. Low-cycle fatigue behavior and microstructural evolution in a low-carbon carbide-free bainitic steel[J]. Materials & Design, 2015, 85: 487-496.

淬火低合金中碳钢的力学性能

Mechanical properties of quenched low alloy medium-carbon steel

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杜昭阳, 赵杰, 陈献刚, 曹铁山. 淬火工艺对DH350模具钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 16-24.
[2]	李荣斌, 宗在康, 张志玺, 张如林. 硅对铸态CoCrFeMnNi高熵合金组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 45-52.
[3]	杨杰, 王德成, 李贤君, 巫小林, 侯俊卿, 杨涛, 张赛. Q&P工艺对38MnB5Nb超高强钢力学性能与微观组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 77-83.
[4]	崔毅, 曹文全, 王艳, 崔继红, 马超, 田仲杰, 张雲飞. 固溶温度及冷却方式对00Cr40Ni55Al3Ti合金组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 142-148.
[5]	杨泾萍, 周文凤, 闻福林, 刘建辉. 双级时效对ZL205A合金力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 149-152.
[6]	刘阳, 亓海全, 秦翔智, 韩向楠, 李天然. 水热环境下Al-9.2Zn-2.4Mg-1.5Cu铝合金挤压板的固溶时效行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 166-171.
[7]	蔡小叶, 程宗辉, 董定平, 白兵, 谢隋杰. 热处理对L-PBF成形Ti-6Al-4V钛合金显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 183-189.
[8]	胡生双, 陈素明, 颜家维, 岳珊, 高晓颖, 欧阳德来. 时效温度对TB18钛合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 190-194.
[9]	张智, 罗登超, 李旭升, 李倩, 梁佳威, 苏松林, 任伟宁, 王莎. 热处理温度对TA15钛合金管材组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 195-198.
[10]	贺骁勇, 邢淑清, 郎瑞卿, 刘永珍, 陈重毅, 麻永林. 脉冲磁场对TC18钛合金时效过程中组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 203-207.
[11]	董欣欣, 吴静, 李梦欢, 田亚强, 唐勤. 回火时间对Cr-Ni-Cu系舰船用高强钢组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 208-214.
[12]	李家辉, 王富雪, 方晓英, 王洪涛. 冷却方式对45CrNiMoVA高强钢显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 215-219.
[13]	魏巍, 罗雄, 范俊明, 陈刘斌, 吴明霞. 热处理对高压气瓶封头显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 220-223.
[14]	陈浩, 涂宇杰, 蒋志鹏, 吴晓春. H11钢大型压铸模块真空气淬的数值模拟与试验[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 227-235.
[15]	王富雪, 李家辉, 王强, 王洪涛. 表面机械滚压处理对退火TWIP钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 274-280.