稳定化退火对新型5×××铝合金组织与性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.04.028

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 175-182.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.04.028

稳定化退火对新型5×××铝合金组织与性能的影响

孙进宝^1,2, 王少华^1,2, 刘惠^1,2, 李国爱^1,2, 王海龙^1,2, 张景亮^1,2, 周志宇^1,2

1.北京航空材料研究院, 北京 100095;
2.北京市先进铝合金材料及应用工程技术研究中心, 北京 100095

收稿日期:2023-10-16 修回日期:2024-03-12 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-05-27
作者简介:孙进宝(1985—),男,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为铝合金及其成形工艺,E-mail:jinbao621@163.com

Effect of stabilizing annealing on microstructure and properties of a new 5××× aluminum alloy

Sun Jinbao^1,2, Wang Shaohua^1,2, Liu Hui^1,2, Li Guoai^1,2, Wang Hailong^1,2, Zhang Jingliang^1,2, Zhou Zhiyu^1,2

1. Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China;
2. Beijing Engineering Research Center of Advanced Aluminum Alloys and Application, Beijing 100095, China

Received:2023-10-16 Revised:2024-03-12 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-05-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用扫描电镜、电子背散射衍射、透射电镜、晶间腐蚀质量损失测试和室温拉伸性能测试等手段,研究了稳定化退火温度和时间对新型5×××铝合金组织与性能的影响规律。结果表明,随着稳定化退火温度的升高,5×××铝合金静态再结晶过程趋于完全,{001}<100>织构组分逐渐占据主导地位。不同稳定化退火处理对铝合金的室温拉伸性能无显著影响。当稳定化退火温度为200~260 ℃时,保温20 min就会加速β相在晶界上的沉淀和球化,连续分布的网状析出相会严重恶化合金的耐晶间腐蚀性能;当稳定化退火温度为270~300 ℃时,保温10~60 min后,合金晶间腐蚀产生的质量损失满足标准ASTM G67中小于15 mg/cm²的要求。因此,最佳稳定化退火工艺参数为:保温温度270~300 ℃,保温时间10~60 min。

关键词: 5×××铝合金, 稳定化处理, 析出相, 晶间腐蚀, 组织性能

Abstract: Effect of stabilizing annealing temperature and time on microstructure and properties of a new 5××× aluminum alloy was investigated by means of SEM, EBSD, TEM, intergranular corrosion mass loss test and tensile properties test. The results show that the static recrystallization of the 5××× aluminum alloy is gradually completed with the increase of stabilizing annealing temperature, showing a dominant role of {001}<100> texture component. The various stabilizing annealing treatments have no significant effect on the tensile properties of the aluminum alloy at room temperature. When the annealing temperature is located within the range of 200-260 ℃, the precipitation and spheroidization of β phase on the grain boundary can be accelerated after holding for 20 min. The continuous distribution of precipitation network seriously deteriorates the intergranular corrosion resistance of the aluminum alloy. In contrast, the mass loss of intergranular corrosion can meet the ASTM G67 requirement of less than 15 mg/cm² when the stablizing annealing treatment is performed at 270-300 ℃ for 10-60 min. Thus, the optimum stabilization treatment for the aluminum alloy is annealing at 270-300 ℃ and holding for 10-60 min.

Key words: 5××× aluminum alloy, stabilization treatment, precipitation, intergranular corrosion, microstructure and properties

中图分类号:

TG146.2

孙进宝, 王少华, 刘惠, 李国爱, 王海龙, 张景亮, 周志宇. 稳定化退火对新型5×××铝合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(4): 175-182.

Sun Jinbao, Wang Shaohua, Liu Hui, Li Guoai, Wang Hailong, Zhang Jingliang, Zhou Zhiyu. Effect of stabilizing annealing on microstructure and properties of a new 5××× aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(4): 175-182.

参考文献

[1]杨志成, 田志强, 孔小东. 船用Al-Mn-Mg合金的耐蚀性能比较[J]. 兵工自动化, 2014, 33(6): 40-42.
Yang Zhicheng, Tian Zhiqiang, Kong Xiaodong. Comparison of corrosion resistance of Al-Mn-Mg aluminum alloy used for boat[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2014, 33(6): 40-42.
[2]Fayomi I S O, Abdulwah M, Popoola I P A, et al. Corrosion resistance of AA6063-type Al-Mg-Si alloy by silicon carbide in sodium chloride solution for marine application[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2015, 14(4): 459-462.
[3]朱希一, 何建贤, 赵启忠, 等. 退火温度对船用Al-Mg-Mn-Cr合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(5): 133-137.
Zhu Xiyi, He Jianxian, Zhao Qizhong, et al. Effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and properties of marine Al-Mg-Mn-Cr alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(5): 133-137.
[4]方剑, 黄彦, 喻国铭, 等. 冷变形对Al-Mg-Si-Zr耐热铝合金性能及静态再结晶的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(8): 37-40.
Fang Jiag, Huang Yan, Yu Guoming, et al. Influence of cold deformation on properties and static recrystallization of Al-Mg-Si-Zr heat-resistant aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(8): 37-40.
[5]Jang D H, Park Y B, Kim W J. Significant strengthening in superlight Al-Mg alloy with an exceptionally large amount of Mg (13wt%) after cold rolling[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 744: 36-44.
[6]齐忠原, 巫瑞智, 王国军, 等. 铝合金在船舶和海洋工程中的应用[J]. 轻合金加工技术, 2016, 44(1): 12-18.
Qi Zhongyuan, Wu Ruizhi, Wang Guojun, et al. Application of aluminum alloys in shipping and ocean engineering[J]. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology, 2016, 44(1): 12-18.
[7]Li X, Liu Y, Zhou Z. Grain refinement and performance enhancement of laser powder bed fusion in-situ processed Al-Mg alloy modified by ScH3 and ZrH2[J]. Materials Characterization, 2022, 190: 112068.[8]Li Z, Yan H, Chen J, et al. Enhancing damping capacity and mechanical properties of Al-Mg alloy by high strain rate hot rolling and subsequent cold rolling[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2022, 908: 164677.
[9]Galvele J R, De Micheli S M. Mechanism of intergranular corrosion of Al-Cu alloys[J]. Corrosion Science, 1970, 10(11): 795-807.
[10]Beura V K, Kale C, Srinivasan S, et al. Corrosion behavior of a dynamically deformed Al-Mg alloy[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2020, 354: 136695.
[11]Choi K H, Kim B H, Lee D B, et al. Effect of combined extrusion and rolling parameters on mechanical and corrosion properties of new high strength Al-Mg alloy[J]. Metals, 2021, 11: 445.
[12]Yang X, Chen H, Zhu Z, et al. Stress corrosion behavior of narrow-gap rotating laser welding of thick Al-Mg alloy joint[J]. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2019, 34: 2040062.
[13]Yassar R S, Field D P, Weiland H. The effect of predeformation on the β″ and β′ precipitates and the role of Q′ phase in an Al-Mg-Si alloy AA6022[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2005, 53: 299-303.
[14]彭勇宜, 尹志民. Sc与Zr对Al-Mg-Mn合金力学性能和剥落腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 中国稀土学报, 2006, 24(2): 217-222.
Peng Yongyi, Yin Zhimin. Effect of Sc and Zr on mechanical and exfoliation corrosion properties of Al-Mg-Mn alloys[J]. Journal of the Chinese Society of Rare Earths, 2006, 24(2): 217-222.
[15]Popovic M, Romhanji E. Stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of Al-Mg alloy sheet with high Mg content[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002, 125-126: 275-280.
[16]张鑫明, 聂祚仁, 黄晖, 等. 冷变形及退火对5E06铝板晶间腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2013, 23(11): 3056-3063.
Zhang Xinming, Nie Zuoren, Huang Hui, et al. Effect of cold deformation and annealing on intergranular corrosion property of 5E06 aluminium alloy plates[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2013, 23(11): 3056-3063.

稳定化退火对新型5×××铝合金组织与性能的影响

Effect of stabilizing annealing on microstructure and properties of a new 5××× aluminum alloy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马启东, 张宇博, 岳世鹏, 陈佳乐, 李廷举. 深冷轧制及时效处理过程中Cu-Fe合金的组织性能演变[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(4): 48-54.
[2]	薛润东, 方锡祯. 热处理工艺和铜含量对高硅无取向硅钢织构的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(4): 78-82.
[3]	陶天成, 臧凯, 朱治愿. 长期时效对GH4169合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(4): 83-88.
[4]	王成宇, 安腾, 谢兴飞, 吕少敏, 曲敬龙. GH4730合金累积变形过程中的组织演变规律[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(4): 88-94.
[5]	汪英芝, 郑留伟, 杨飞, 聂豫晋, 孟立鑫, 尹磊, 梁伟. 选区激光熔化Inconel 718合金的沉淀析出行为及力学性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 141-146.
[6]	郭续龙, 周扬, 陈琦. Inconel718高温合金Laves相及碳化物析出机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 190-197.
[7]	陆凤君. V-N微合金化非调质钢的组织和力学性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 204-208.
[8]	裴明德, 李国平, 秦宇航, 张峰, 范新智, 郭宏钢. V含量对不锈钢TDVS2001组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 251-255.
[9]	汤慧珍, 王帅, 燕丽娟, 张永超, 沈俊, 葛炳辉. 人工时效对7075铝合金微观腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 153-158.
[10]	高雪鹏, 孙有政, 曹善鹏, 牛博雅, 李宾良, 王萍. 热处理工艺对7075铝合金组织及晶间腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 159-165.
[11]	刘文明, 张新明, 程新路, 欧阳凯. 焊后热处理对S30408/Q345R不锈钢复合板耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 172-178.
[12]	孙博, 聂佳民, 李晓丹, 何长树. 强制冷却和低温时效对2198-T3/7A04-T6异种铝合金FSW接头组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 8-13.
[13]	周江, 项国东, 徐昶, 张显程, 夏咸喜, 朱保印, 赵彦芬, 金晓. 长时服役后HR3C钢析出相变化及对硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 203-207.
[14]	陈文涛, 尹靖, 王春艳, 胡桂领. 激光增材制造6061铝合金热处理及强韧机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 172-178.
[15]	黄志国, 曹永政, 李艳艳, 蒋波. 10.9级紧固件用贝氏体型非调质冷镦钢的研究现状[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 219-224.