固溶处理对7175铝合金组织和力学性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.05.031

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 186-192.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.05.031

固溶处理对7175铝合金组织和力学性能的影响

赵忠超^1,2, 汲庆涛^1,2, 曹善鹏¹, 唐和壮¹, 李宾良³, 牛博雅³, 孙有政^1,4

1.山东南山铝业股份有限公司国家铝合金压力加工工程技术研究中心, 山东龙口 264000;
2.山东南山科学技术研究院有限公司山东省铝合金压力加工技术创新中心, 山东龙口 264000;
3.中航西安飞机工业集团股份有限公司, 陕西西安 710089;
4.烟台南山学院材料科学与工程学院, 山东龙口 264000

收稿日期:2023-10-21 修回日期:2024-03-10 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-06-28
通讯作者: 孙有政,高级工程师,博士,E-mail:sunyouzheng@nanshan.com.cn
作者简介:赵忠超(1995—),男,硕士,主要研究方向为有色金属塑性加工,E-mail:1085335646@qq.com。

Effect of solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of 7175 aluminum alloy

Zhao Zhongchao^1,2, Ji Qingtao^1,2, Cao Shanpeng¹, Tang Hezhuang¹, Li Binliang³, Niu Boya³, Sun Youzheng^1,4

1. National Aluminum Alloy Pressure Processing Engineering Technology Research Center, Shandong Nanshan Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd., Longkou Shandong 264000, China;
2. Shandong Aluminum Alloy Pressure Processing Technology Innovation Center, Shandong Nanshan Institute of Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Longkou Shandong 264000, China;
3. AVIC Xi'an Aircraft Industry Group Co., Ltd., Xi'an Shaanxi 710089, China;
4. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Yantai Nanshan University, Longkou Shandong 264000, China

Received:2023-10-21 Revised:2024-03-10 Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过拉伸性能测试、硬度测试、光学显微镜(OM)、扫描电镜(SEM)和透射电镜(TEM)研究了固溶处理工艺对7175铝合金微观组织和性能的影响。结果表明,当7175铝合金在485 ℃×3.5 h固溶时,第二相逐渐减少,晶粒有粗化趋势;在475 ℃×2.5 h固溶时,MgZn₂相会依托含Cr相在晶界处形核,起到钉扎晶界作用,抑制晶粒长大。同时,随着固溶温度的升高和固溶时间的延长,经120 ℃×12 h+165 ℃×5.5 h双级时效处理后的7175铝合金抗拉强度、显微硬度出现先升高后降低的趋势,当固溶处理工艺为475 ℃×2.5 h时,其抗拉强度为631.2 MPa,屈服强度为555.7 MPa,伸长率为12.5%,综合力学性能最佳。

关键词: 铝合金, 微观组织, 固溶处理, 力学性能

Abstract: Effect of solution treatment process on microstructure and properties of 7175 aluminum alloy was investigated through tensile property testing,hardness testing,optical microscope(OM),scanning electron microscope(SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The results show that when the 7175 aluminum alloy is solution treated at 485 ℃ for 3.5 h,the second phase contont gradually decreases, and there is a tendency for grain coarsening. When the 7175 aluminum alloy is solution treated at 475 ℃ for 2.5 h,MgZn₂ phase will rely on the Cr containing phase to nucleate at the grain boundary, playing a role in pinning the grain boundary and inhibiting grain growth. At the same time, with the increase of solution temperature and time, the tensile strength and microhardness of the alloy after aging at 120 ℃ for 12 h and 165 ℃ for 5.5 h show a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. When the solution treatment process is 475 ℃×2.5 h,the tensile strength is 631.2 MPa, the yield strength is 555.7 MPa and the elongation is 12.5%, with the optimal comprehensive mechanical properties.

Key words: aluminum alloy, microstructure, solution treatment, mechanical properties

中图分类号:

TG146.2

赵忠超, 汲庆涛, 曹善鹏, 唐和壮, 李宾良, 牛博雅, 孙有政. 固溶处理对7175铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 186-192.

Zhao Zhongchao, Ji Qingtao, Cao Shanpeng, Tang Hezhuang, Li Binliang, Niu Boya, Sun Youzheng. Effect of solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of 7175 aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(5): 186-192.

参考文献

[1]Geng H C, Wang Y L, Zhu B, et al. Effect of solution treatment time on plasticity and ductile fracture of 7075 aluminum alloy sheet in hot stamping process[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2022, 32(11): 3516-3533.
[2]郑可, 李传维, 顾剑锋. 固溶态和时效态7075铝合金的微纳米压痕力学行为[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2023, 44(1): 39-48.
Zheng Ke, Li Chuanxiong, Gu Jianfeng. Micro-nano indentation mechanical behavior of 7075 aluminum alloy in solution and aging states[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2023, 44(1): 39-48.
[3]余代尧, 黄兴民, 赵君文, 等. 固溶温度对7A85铝合金显微组织和断裂机理的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2022, 43(12): 36-44.
Yu Daiyao, Huang Xingmin, Zhao Junwen, et al. Effect of solution temperature on microstructure and fracture mechanism of 7A85 aluminum alloy[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2022, 43 (12): 36-44.
[4]马冬威, 张春, 张元好, 等. 固溶工艺对6061铝合金组织和拉伸性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(5): 74-77.
Ma Dongwei, Zhang Chun, Zhang Yuanhao, et al. Effect of solution process on microstructure and tensile properties of 6061 aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(5): 74-77.
[5]王逸飞, 张艳, 王振旭, 等. 热处理对氮间隙固溶CoCrFeMnNi高熵合金组织及性能的影响[J]. 特种铸造及有色合金, 2022, 42(1): 55-59.
Wang Yifei, Zhang Yan, Wang Zhenxu, et al. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and properties of nitrogen interstitial solution high entropy alloy[J]. Special Casting and Nonferrous Alloys, 2022, 42(1): 55-59.
[6]Abdi M, Shabestari S G. Novel high strength Al-10.5Si-3.4Cu-0.2Mg alloy produced through two-stage solution heat treatment[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2021, 31(3): 576-585.
[7]Song W W, Pu J F, Wang H F, et al. Effect of solid-solution process on the properties of 7050 aluminum alloy[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2020, 866: 63-71.
[8]王国军, 熊柏青, 张永安, 等. 固溶热处理对2D70合金挤压棒材组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2010, 35(3): 37-42.
Wang Guojun, Xiong Baiqing, Zhang Yongan, et al. Effect of solution treatment on microstructure and properties of 2D70 alloy extruded rod[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2010, 35(3): 37-42.
[9]陈由红, 兰博, 孙兴, 等. 固溶处理对挤压/等温锻复合工艺制备的GH710合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2020, 41(8): 42-48.
Chen Youhong, Lan Bo, Sun Xing, et al. Effect of solid solution treatment on microstructure and properties of GH710 alloy prepared by extrusion/isothermal forging process[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2020, 41(8): 42-48.
[10]王琛, 刘文博, 李涛. 热处理对航空用TC4合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(8): 107-110.
Wang Chen, Liu Wenbo, Li Tao. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of TC4 alloy for aviation application[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(8): 107-110.
[11]孙文超. 固溶处理后7055铝合金的摩擦磨损性能研究[J]. 世界有色金属, 2022(21): 139-141.
Sun Wenchao. Friction and wear properties of 7055 aluminum alloy after solution treatment[J]. World Nonferrous Metals, 2022(21): 139-141.
[12]李惠曲, 邢清源, 饶茂, 等. 超高强度7A36铝合金挤压管材热处理工艺研究[J]. 材料工程, 2023, 51(4): 113-121.
Li Huiqu, Xing Qingyuan, Rao Mao, et al. Heat treatment of ultrahigh strength 7A36 aluminum alloy extruded tube[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2023, 51(4): 113-121.
[13]欧奕孜, 江勇. 7系铝合金η′→η₂相转变过程中主元素的作用[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2022, 32(8): 2222-2230.
Ou Yizi, Jiang Yong. Effects of major alloying elements on η′→η₂ phase transformation in 7××× Al alloys[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2022, 32(8): 2222-2230.
[14]刘世雷, 陈雷, 刘洪雷, 等. 7B04铝合金特殊用途板材的热处理技术研究[J]. 轻合金加工技术, 2022, 50(6): 37-40.
Liu Shilei, Chen Lei, Liu Honglei, et al. Study on heat treatment technology of 7B04 aluminum alloy special-purpose sheet[J]. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology, 2022, 50(6): 37-40.
[15]张晗, 郝启堂, 李新雷, 等. 热处理工艺对Al-Cu-Mn-Mg合金微观组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2023, 44(3): 58-67.
Zhang Han, Hao Qitang, Li Xinlei, et al. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Cu-Mn-Mg alloy[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2023, 44(3): 58-67.
[16]潘仁杰, 陈康敏, 郭辉, 等. 固溶处理时间对Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg铝合金型材组织及压溃性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(10): 101-107.
Pan Renjie, Chen Kangmin, Guo Hui, et al. Effect of solid solution time on microstructure and crushing performance of Al-5.7Zn-0.7Mg aluminum alloy profiles[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(10): 101-107.
[17]刘萌, 李新亚, 臧勇, 等. 固溶成形工艺对6016铝合金组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(2): 138-143.
Liu Meng, Li Xinya, Zang Yong, et al. Effect of solution forming process on microstructure and mechanical properties of 6016 aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2023, 48(2): 138-143.

固溶处理对7175铝合金组织和力学性能的影响

Effect of solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of 7175 aluminum alloy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何宗政, 吴名冬, 袁硕, 姚树伟, 肖代红, 黄兰萍, 刘文胜. Zn/Mg比对7075铝合金显微组织、力学性能和耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 1-9.
[2]	鲍峥, 程翔, 王若民, 缪春辉, 陈国宏, 汤文明. 不同服役期TP347HFG钢管显微组织与力学性能的对比[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 10-16.
[3]	杨希锐, 江宝世, 胡锋涛, 李艳军, 盛超杰, 王晨. 高温长期服役S30432钢管的组织与性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 17-21.
[4]	王书亮, 毛一点, 李奇霖, 周禄江, 西宇辰, 张华礼. V对富Fe非等原子比FeCrCoNi高熵合金组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 22-28.
[5]	王英虎, 王婀娜, 蔡晓文. 铜含量对303易切削钢中硫化物形貌及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 29-35.
[6]	郭炜, 管博, 陈威, 吴丹. 多次闭模压缩对不同Si含量AZ31合金显微组织和耐磨性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 36-39.
[7]	李波, 向伟, 张枫, 秦锋英, 袁武华. 预时效处理对亚稳态β钛合金TB18组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 106-111.
[8]	王泽龙, 冯兆龙, 李伟, 孙思博. 冷塑性变形及退火工艺对Ti45Nb合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 112-117.
[9]	邢振强, 庞景宇, 张宏伟, 纪宇, 朱正旺, 张龙, 王爱民, 张海峰. 冷轧、退火和时效对Fe₅₀Ni₂₅Cr₁₅Al₁₀高熵合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 118-123.
[10]	张增光, 史吉鹏, 王新宇, 刘艳梅, 杨立新, 康冲, 刘刚. 退火温度对Ti60钛合金激光焊接接头组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 130-134.
[11]	张勇, 马青山, 李如杨, 胡效东. S11306铁素体不锈钢厚板焊后热处理特性[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 146-152.
[12]	石磊, 田鹏勇, 施莹, 白雪, 杨芳. 两相区退火对铁素体/贝氏体双相钢组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 158-161.
[13]	朱艳强, 李永刚, 何琼, 刘哲兵. 深冷处理对X70管线钢组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 168-172.
[14]	蒲博闻, 刘玉婷, 王延荣, 刁占英, 何敬卫. 调质处理对34CrNiMo6钢连杆锻件组织与硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 173-178.
[15]	刘子知, 孙福臻, 李晓旭, 李蕙宇, 张泉达, 穆雪松, 赵岩. 固溶时效处理对稀土铝合金力学性能及组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 193-198.