含Cu低碳球扁钢球头与腹板的组织性能差异

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.09.002

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (9): 11-17.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.09.002

含Cu低碳球扁钢球头与腹板的组织性能差异

梁丰瑞¹, 苏航¹, 柴锋¹, 孙铭璇²

1.钢铁研究总院有限公司工程用钢研究院, 北京 100081;
2.北京科技大学新金属材料国家重点实验室, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2024-06-11 修回日期:2024-07-23 出版日期:2024-09-25 发布日期:2024-10-29
作者简介:梁丰瑞(1983—),男,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为船舶及海工用钢材料,E-mail: liangfengrui_@163.com

Difference of microstructure and properties between bulb and flat of Cu-bearing low-carbon bulb flat steel

Liang Fengrui¹, Su Hang¹, Chai Feng¹, Sun Mingxuan²

1. Research Institute of Engineering Steels, Central Iron and Steel Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100081, China;
2. State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2024-06-11 Revised:2024-07-23 Online:2024-09-25 Published:2024-10-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用电子背散射衍射(EBSD)、场发射扫描电镜(FE-SEM)和能谱仪(EDS)分析含Cu低碳球扁钢在热轧-感应加热-固溶-时效后的组织演变规律,并根据强化机制,分析造成球头、腹板存在差异的原因。结果表明,在不同热处理阶段,含Cu低碳球扁钢腹板晶粒尺寸均小于球头,腹板处富Cu相析出进程落后于球头,680 ℃时效2 h后,腹板强度及硬度高于球头,伸长率稍弱于球头;热轧-感应加热-固溶-时效过程,球扁钢依次经历热变形、铁素体-奥氏体转变、马氏体相变及回复阶段;造成球头、腹板存在约50 MPa强度差异的原因,富Cu相尺寸差异为主要因素,晶粒尺寸差异为次要因素,位错密度差异为微弱因素。

关键词: 含Cu低碳球扁钢, 感应加热, 富Cu相, 强化机制

Abstract: Microstructure evolution of Cu-bearing low-carbon bulb flat steel during hot-rolling-induction heating-solid solution-tempering treatment was characterized using electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS). The difference between the bulb and flat was analyzed based on the strengthening mechanism. The results show that at different heat treatment stages, the grain size of flat is smaller than that of the bulb, while the precipitation of Cu-rich particles in the flat is improved. After aging at 680 ℃ for 2 h, compared with the bulb, the flat exhibit a higher strength and hardness and a relatively lower elongation. During hot-rolling-induction heating-solid solution-tempering process, the bulb flat steel undergoes thermal deformation, ferrite austenite transformation, martensitic transformation, and recovery stages in sequence. The strength difference of about 50 MPa between the flat and the blub is attributed to the major factor of the size difference of Cu-rich particles, the secondary factor of the difference in grain size and the weak factor of the difference in dislocation density.

Key words: Cu-bearing low-carbon bulb flat steel, induction heating, Cu-rich particles, strengthening mechanism

中图分类号:

TG142.1

梁丰瑞, 苏航, 柴锋, 孙铭璇. 含Cu低碳球扁钢球头与腹板的组织性能差异[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(9): 11-17.

Liang Fengrui, Su Hang, Chai Feng, Sun Mingxuan. Difference of microstructure and properties between bulb and flat of Cu-bearing low-carbon bulb flat steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(9): 11-17.

参考文献

[1]Hosseini A R, Anijdan S H M, Mousavi S H, et al. The effect of increasing Cu and Ni on a significant enhancement of mechanical properties of high strength low alloy, low carbon steels of HSLA-100 type[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 746: 384-393.
[2]张中武. 高强度低合金钢(HSLA)的研究进展[J]. 中国材料进展, 2016, 35(2): 141-151.
Zhang Zhongwu. Research development of high strength low alloy(HSLA) steels[J]. Materials China, 2016, 35(2): 141-151.
[3]朱志明, 柴锋, 梁丰瑞, 等. 低合金钢感应淬火温度场模拟与优化[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2017, 29(1): 75-80.
Zhu Zhiming, Chai Feng, Liang Fengrui, et al. Temperature field simulation and optimization of low alloy-steel involved induction hardening[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2017, 29(1): 75-80.
[4]陈晨, 罗小兵, 梁丰瑞, 等. 淬火加热方法对含铜高强度球扁钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 热处理, 2021, 36(3): 31-36, 54.
Chen Chen, Luo Xiaobing, Liang Fengrui, et al. Effect of methods of heating for hardening on microstructure and properties of cooper-bearing high-strength flat bulb steel[J]. Heat Treatment, 2021, 36(3): 31-36, 54.
[5]陈密达, 张云祥, 梁丰瑞, 等. 碳和氮含量对大规格球扁钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 钢铁, 2023, 58(4): 126-137.
Chen Mida, Zhang Yunxiang, Liang Fengrui, et al. Effect of C and N contents on mechanical properties of tempered large size bulb flat steel[J]. Iron and Steel, 2023, 58(4): 126-137.
[6]申喆, 薛素玲, 朱建平. 热处理对建筑用X90管线钢组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 铸造技术, 2015, 36(5): 1177-1179.
Shen Zhe, Xue Suling, Zhu Jianping. Influence of heat treatment on microstructures and mechanical propertiesof X90 grade pipeline steel used for architectural applications[J]. Foundry Technology, 2015, 36(5): 1177-1179.
[7]周松波. 低温转变无碳化物贝氏体生长特征及塑性变形机理研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2023.
[8]杜瑜宾, 胡小锋, 张守清, 等. 含1.4%Cu的HSLA钢的组织和力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(10): 1343-1354.
Du Yubin, Hu Xiaofeng, Zhang Shouqing, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of HSLA steel containing 1.4%Cu[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2020, 56(10): 1343-1354.
[9]Xiong Z, Timokhina I, Pereloma E. Clustering, nano-scale precipitation and strengthening of steels[J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2021, 118: 100764.
[10]雍岐龙. 钢铁材料中的第二相[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2006.
[11]Gutiérrez I, Altuna M A. Work-hardening of ferrite and microstructure-based modelling of its mechanical behaviour under tension[J]. Acta Materialia, 2008, 56(17): 4682-4690.
[12]张中武, 魏兴豪, 赵刚. 低合金高强钢的强韧化机理与焊接性能[J]. 鞍钢技术, 2018(4): 1-8.
Zhang Zhongwu, Wei Xinghao, Zhao Gang. Strengthening and toughening mechanism for high strength low alloy steel and its weldability[J]. Angang Technology, 2018(4): 1-8.
[13]刘庆冬. HSLA铁素体钢中Cu析出强化和奥氏体韧化的原子探针层析技术研究[D]. 上海: 上海大学, 2012.
[14]李振团, 柴锋, 罗小兵, 等. 时效温度对Cu沉淀强化超高强海工钢力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(6): 6132-6137.
Li Zhentuan, Chai Feng, Luo Xiaobing, et al. Effect of aging temperature on mechanical properties of ultra high strength marine engineering steel strengthened by Cu precipitation[J]. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(6): 6132-6137.
[15]Holzer I, Kozeschnik E. Computer simulation of the yield strength evolution in Cu-precipitation strengthened ferritic steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2010, 527(15): 3546-3551.
[16]Povoden-Karadeniz E, Kozeschnik E. Simulation of precipitation kinetics and precipitation strengthening of B2-precipitates in martensitic PH13-8Mo steel[J]. ISIJ International, 2012, 52(4): 610-615.

含Cu低碳球扁钢球头与腹板的组织性能差异

Difference of microstructure and properties between bulb and flat of Cu-bearing low-carbon bulb flat steel

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高新勃, 覃庆良. 无模型自适应控制在大型12Cr2Mo1V钢热处理中的应用[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(9): 290-296.
[2]	李为先, 彭伟, 胡杰, 刘腾轼, 周路海, 董瀚. Cu对390 MPa级CrNiMo系低合金船用钢板力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(4): 1-7.
[3]	王康红, 许洋洋. 相场法研究时效温度对Fe-Cu-Mn-Ni合金中富Cu相析出的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 265-270.
[4]	陈波, 尹树春, 梁振威, 刘丽萍, 张继国, 翟昌源, 刘涛. 高韧性2 GPa级热成形钢热冲压工艺及应用性能分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(7): 166-175.
[5]	孟亚森, 潘丽芳, 张红旭, 刘鹏, 任志峰, 刘光明. 新型700 MPa级高强锚杆钢的微观组织及强化机制[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(5): 41-48.
[6]	孙铭璇, 孟利, 张宁, 张波, 梁丰瑞, 罗小兵. 感应淬火条件下Cu-Ni低碳低合金钢的强化机制[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(4): 204-210.
[7]	孙铭璇, 孟利, 张宁, 张波, 梁丰瑞, 罗小兵. 低碳含Cu中厚钢板富Cu相的时效析出行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(2): 94-102.
[8]	陈晨杰, 李建华. 感应加热淬火硬化层起始点调整方法[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(12): 292-294.
[9]	王为民, 刘安奇, 郭春成, 笪仲钟, 亓海全, 韩向楠, 薛启河, 魏敏君. 感应炉+井式炉复合加热工艺对40Cr钢调质组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(11): 185-190.
[10]	崔树刚, 史长鑫, 谷国超, 许文花, 吕宇鹏. 海工用低合金高强钢厚板的组织与力学性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(10): 37-44.
[11]	张金城, 孙胜辉, 蔡明晖, 赵文柱, 丁桦. 控轧控冷对Ti-Mo-Nb复合微合金化低碳钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(1): 155-162.
[12]	王明明, 马飞, 裴未迟, 李冬冬, 龙海洋, 纪宏超, 刘帅. 汽车用高强塑积中锰钢的研究进展[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(9): 272-280.
[13]	谌卓豪, 谢晖. 双回路线圈连续移动感应加热的数值分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(8): 105-111.
[14]	代永娟, 武祥祥, 李佳坤, 国栋, 王波. 退火温度对Fe-24.38Mn-0.44C TWIP钢组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 146-152.
[15]	何利军, 周龙, 汤淳坡, 郭小钢, 金晓, 赵彦芬, 薛飞, 张国栋. 长时服役后T92钢管的微观组织及力学性能变化[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(7): 31-36.