压力容器免除焊后热处理的最大厚度

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.11.021

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 工程实践表明现代钢材质量与焊接技术足以保证结构钢在更大厚度时免除焊后热处理,相关厚度值远高于现行规范源于工程经验的最大焊后热处理(Post weld heat treatment,PWHT)豁免厚度规定。从压力容器防脆断的角度出发,基于断裂力学原理,研究了材料最大PWHT豁免厚度的影响因素,结合Q345R钢性能数据,评价了具体厚度值的工程适用性,分析指出保守的防脆断条款是导致我国压力容器规范最大PWHT豁免厚度小于欧美规范的根本原因。

关键词: 压力容器, 焊后热处理, 最大豁免厚度, 断裂力学

Abstract: Engineering practice shows that modern steel quality and welding technology are sufficient to ensure that the structural steel is exempt from post weld heat treatment at larger thicknesses. Relevant thickness is much larger than the provision of maximum exemption thickness of PWHT in the specifications, which originates from engineering experience. In the light of the potential brittle fracture failure of pressure vessel, the method for determining maximum exemption thickness of PWHT was suggested according to the principle of fracture mechanics. Combined with performance data of the Q345R steel, the engineering applicability of the specific thickness values was demonstrated. The results show that the conservative brittle fracture prevention requirements results in the maximum exemption thickness of PWHT in Chinese pressure vessel code being less than that of European and American codes.

Key words: pressure vessel, post weld heat treatment(PWHT), maximum exemption thickness, fracture mechanics

中图分类号:

TG404

崔庆丰, 房务农. 压力容器免除焊后热处理的最大厚度[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(11): 137-142.

Cui Qingfeng, Fang Wunong. Maximum exemption thickness of post weld heat treatment for pressure vessels[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(11): 137-142.

参考文献

[1]陈重毅, 麻永林, 王文君, 等. 核用SA508-3钢特厚板焊后热处理有限元分析[J]. 焊接学报, 2016, 37(2): 80-84.
Chen Zhongyi, Ma Yonglin, Wang Wenjun. Finite element analysis on post-weld heat treatment of heavy section SA508-3 steel plate for nuclear vessel[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2016, 37(2): 80-84.
[2]张道良. 压力容器的焊后热处理(二)[J]. 石油化工设备, 1987, 16(7): 33-37, 21.
[3]Abson D J, Tkach Y, Hadely I, et al. A review of post weld heat treatment code exemptions[J]. Welding Journal, 2006, 85(3): 63-69.
[4]McCracken S. EPRI 1019171: Welding and repair technology center: Evaluation of post weld heat treatment (PWHT) exemption thickness limitations[R]. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, 2009.
[5]Hayashi T, Kim C C, Kumagai K, et al. Technical basis for the exemptions to mandatory post weld heat treatment (PWHT) of SA-738 Grade B for Sec. III Div. 1 Subsection NE application[C]//ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017: V06BT06A025.
[6]Kim J, Lee J S, Choi S, et al. Relaxation of exemption requirement of PWHT for SA-508 Grade 1A, by consideration surface welding residual stress as evaluated by instrumented indentation testing method[C]//ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017: V01BT01A019.
[7]Sagan S S, Campbell H C. Welding Research Council Bulletin 59: Factors which affect low-alloy weld-metal notch-toughness[R]. Welding Research Council, 1960.
[8]Stout R D. Welding research council bulletin 302: Post weld heat treatment of pressure vessel steels[R]. Welding Research Council, 1985.
[9]Orie K, Roper C R, Upitis E. Welding research council bulletin 481: The effect of post weld heat treatment and notch toughness on welded joints and on normalized base-metal properties of A516 steel[R]. Welding Research Council, 2003.
[10]Spaeder C, Doty W, O'Donnell J. STP-PT-033: Degradation of Notch Toughness By a Post Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT)[M]. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2011.
[11]欧阳鑫, 王储, 胡昕明, 等. 模拟焊后热处理对SA-516Gr. 60容器钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(9): 219-222.
Ouyang Xin, Wang Chu, Hu Xinming, et al. Effect of simulated post weld heat treatment on microstructure and properties of SA-516Gr. 60 pressure vessel steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(9): 219-222.
[12]Osage D A, Prager M. Technical basis of material toughness requirements in the ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, Section VIII, Division 2[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2012, 134(3): 031001.
[13]Wiesner C S, Garwood S J, Sandström R, et al. Background to requirements for the prevention of brittle fracture in the European standards for unfired pressure vessels (prEN 13445) and metallic industrial piping (prEN 13480)[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2001, 78(6): 391-399.
[14]冯标, 唐德渝, 杨政. 16MnR钢储油罐省略焊后热处理最大厚度的探讨[J]. 焊接, 1988(5): 1-5.
Feng Biao, Tang Deyu, Yang Zheng. study on the maximum PWHT exemption thickness of 16MnR steel storage tank[J]. Welding, 1988(5): 1-5.
[15]唐超, 陈纾. 小氮肥厂16MnR制液氨贮罐可不作焊后热处理[J]. 化工设备设计, 1994(2): 56-58.
Tang Cao, Chen Shu. 16MnR liquid ammonia storage tank post weld heat treatment exemption in small nitrogenous fertilizer plant[J]. Process Equipment & Piping, 1994(2): 56-58.
[16]张俊宝, 谷雨, 刘卫华. 核电站钢制安全壳SA-738 Gr.B钢免除焊后热处理探讨[J]. 热加工工艺, 2017, 46(1): 230-232.
Zhang Junbao, Gu Yu, Liu Weihua. Discussion on exemption from PWHT of SA-738 Gr.B steel for nuclear power plant steel containment vessel[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2017, 46(1): 230-232.
[17]Sandsträm R, Langenberg P, Sieurin H. Analysis of the brittle fracture avoidance model for pressure vessels in European standard[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2005, 82(11): 872-881.
[18]Newman J C, Raju I S. An empirical stress-intensity factor equation for the surface crack[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1981, 15(1/2): 185-192.
[19]Abson D J, Tkach Y, Hadley I, et al. Assessing toughness levels for steels to determine the need for PWHT[J]. Welding Journal, 2006, 85(5): 29-35.
[20]Roberts R, Newton C. Welding research council bulletin 265: Interpretive report on small scale test correlations with KIc data[R]. WRC Bulletin 265. Welding Research Council, 1981.
[21]Sandström R. Minimum usage temperature for ferritic steels with respect to brittle failure[J]. Design and Analysis, 1989, 2: 937-951.
[22]桂乐乐, 寿比南, 徐彤, 等. 基于Master Curve方法的Q345R钢断裂韧性研究[J]. 压力容器, 2016, 33(2): 10-16, 66.
Gui Lele, Shou Bi'nan, Xu Tong, et al. Estimation of Q345R fracture toughness based on Master Curve[J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2016, 33(2): 10-16, 66.
[23]曹昱澎, 惠虎, 轩福贞, 等. 基于Master Curve方法的16MnR钢韧脆转变区断裂韧性研究[J]. 压力容器, 2008, 25(12): 10-13, 21.
Cao Yupeng, Hui Hu, Xuan Fuzhen, et al. Study on fracture toughness of 16MnR steel in the transition-temperature region using the Master Curve method[J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2008, 25(12): 10-13, 21.
[24]Chauvy C Ã Š, Coudreuse L, Toussaint P. Potential detrimental consequences of excessive PWHT on pressure vessel steel properties[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2012, 134(2): 021401.
[25]邓彩艳, 雷桢禹, 龚宝明, 等. 焊后热处理对复杂结构件完整性的影响[J]. 焊接学报, 2015, 36(9): 5-8.
Deng Caiyan, Lei Zhengyu, Gong Baoming, et al. Effect of post weld heat treatment on integrity of complex structural[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2015, 36(9): 5-8.
[26]赵翠华, 舒欣欣, 杨帆, 等. 海洋平台厚板焊后热处理的豁免判据[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(2): 257-261.
Zhao Cuihua, Shu Xinxin, Yang Fan, et al. Exemption criterion of post-weld heat treatment for offshore platform thick plate[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(2): 257-261.
[27]崔庆丰, 惠虎, 王昊旸, 等. 国产压力容器用钢Q345R的低温韧性研究[J]. 机械强度, 2016, 38(6): 1198-1204.
Cui Qingfeng, Hui Hu, Wang Haoyang, et al. Study on toughness of domestic pressure vessel steel Q345R at low temperature[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2016, 38(6): 1198-1204.