Al-Er-Cu合金架空导线的导电性能

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.05.025

金属热处理 ›› 2021, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 156-159.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.05.025

Al-Er-Cu合金架空导线的导电性能

马晓杰¹, 刘立宁¹, 陈祥光^1,2, 臧伟³

1.烟台南山学院工学院, 山东烟台 265713;
2.北京理工大学化学与化工学院, 北京 100081;
3.山东南山铝业股份有限公司, 山东烟台 265713

收稿日期:2020-10-17 出版日期:2021-05-25 发布日期:2021-07-21
通讯作者: 刘立宁,副教授,博士,E-mail:146785155@qq.com
作者简介:马晓杰(1981—),女,工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为材料与电子元件的性能测试及分析应用,E-mail:3412840024@qq.com。
基金资助:
山东省重点研发计划(2017GGX20130);烟台市“双百计划”人才项目(YT201803)

Conductive property of Al-Er-Cu alloy for overhead wire

Ma Xiaojie¹, Liu Lining¹, Chen Xiangguang^1,2, Zang Wei³

1. College of Engineering, Yantai Nanshan University, Yantai Shandong 265713, China;
2. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
3. Shandong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd., Yantai Shandong 265713, China

Received:2020-10-17 Online:2021-05-25 Published:2021-07-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过导电率、硬度测试方法研究了Al-Er-Cu合金在等时时效与等温时效过程中的性能变化规律,利用透射电镜(TEM)、能谱分析(EDS)观察了合金析出相的析出及生长规律。结果表明:随着时效温度升高,整体上同一合金的导电率与硬度峰值出现时间均提前;300 ℃时效时,Al-Er-0.22Cu合金已经析出大量纳米级弥散相,析出强化了合金强度,提高了导电率,时效2 h时达到导电率峰值60.15%IACS,10 h达到硬度峰值43.1 HV0.05,Al-Er-0.22Cu合金在拥有高导电率的同时保持了较好的硬度。

关键词: Al-Er-Cu合金, 导电率, 时效, 弥散相, 析出强化

Abstract: Properties change rule of the Al-Er-Cu alloy during aging was studied via electrical conductivity and hardness testing. The precipitation and growth law of the precipitated phase in the alloy were observed by means of TEM and EDS. The results show that with the increase of aging temperature, both electrical conductivity and hardness peaks of the same alloy appear earlier on the whole. When aged at 300 ℃, there are a lot of dispersed nano-precipitates in the Al-Er-0.22Cu alloy, and the precipitated phases reinforce the alloy strength and enhance the electrical conductivity. When aged for 2 h, the electrical conductivity reaches the peak value of 60.15%IACS and the hardness peak of 43.1 HV0.05 achieves when aged for 10 h, so the Al-Er-0.22Cu alloy has both high electrical conductivity and good hardness.

Key words: Al-Er-Cu alloy, electrical conductivity, aging, dispersed phase, precipitation strengthening

中图分类号:

TN604

马晓杰, 刘立宁, 陈祥光, 臧伟. Al-Er-Cu合金架空导线的导电性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(5): 156-159.

Ma Xiaojie, Liu Lining, Chen Xiangguang, Zang Wei. Conductive property of Al-Er-Cu alloy for overhead wire[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(5): 156-159.

参考文献

[1]黄崇祺. 架空电力线路用导体材料的研究现状和发展方向[J]. 有色金属材料与工程, 2018, 39(3): 1-10.
Huang Chongqi. Current research and further development of conductor material for overhead transmission line[J]. Nonferrous Metal and Engineering, 2018, 39(3): 1-10.
[2]张强, 韩钰, 卢卫, 等. 架空导线用中强铝合金导体材料综述[J]. 热加工工艺, 2016, 45(18): 7-9.
Zhang Qiang, Han Yu, Lu Wei, et al. Review on moderate strength aluminum alloy conductor material used in overhead wires[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2016, 45(18): 7-9.
[3]杨恩娜, 吴细毛, 李春和, 等. 架空导线用铝合金的机电性能及现状与发展[J]. 材料导报, 2014, 28(17): 111-116.
Yang Enna, Wu Ximao, Li Chunhe, et al. Electromechanical properties, current situation and development of aluminum alloys for overhead conductors[J]. Materials Review, 2014, 28(17): 111-116.
[4]叶辉, 崔晓丽, 崔红卫, 等. 镁与热处理对Al-4Si-(xMg)合金导电性及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(1): 97-103.
Ye Hui, Cui Xiaoli, Cui Hongwei, et al. Effect of magnesium and heat treatment on electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of Al-4Si-(xMg) alloys[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(1): 97-103.
[5]郑红梅, 胡学飞, 崔接武, 等. Sc元素对Al-Mg-Si架空导线的组织及性能影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2017, 38(9): 43-48.
Zheng Hongmei, Hu Xuefei, Cui Jiewu, et al. Effect of Sc on microstructure and performance of Al-Mg-Si aerial cables[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2017, 38(9): 43-48.
[6]田仲良, 陈正宗, 何西扣, 等. 固溶处理对超超临界电站用镍基耐热合金组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(3): 97-102.
Tian Zhongliang, Chen Zhengzong, He Xikou, et al. Effect of solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of heat-resisting Ni-based alloy used for ultra-supercritical power plant[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(3): 97-102.
[7]毛西秦, 肖秋雷, 欧梅桂, 等. 退火工艺对T2纯铜线材组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(7): 7-11.
Mao Xiqin, Xiao Qiulei, Ou Meigui, et al. Effect of annealing process on microstructure and properties of pure copper wire T2[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(7): 7-11.
[8]朱明彪, 李明茂, 黎兆鑫, 等. Cu-Te合金的退火工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(6): 34-38.
Zhu Mingbiao, Li Mingmao, Li Zhaoxin, et al. Annealing process of Cu-Te alloys[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(6): 34-38.
[9]Yoo Hyo-Sang, Kim Yong-Ho, Lee Kyu-Seok, et al. Analysis of microstructure and electric conductivity in Al-RE alloy by heat-treatment condition[J]. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2020, 20(1): 530-534.
[10]韩钰, 夏延秋, 刘东雨, 等. 微量Zr、Er对导线用耐热铝合金性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2015, 40(7): 71-73.
Han Yu, Xia Yanqiu, Liu Dongyu, et al. Effects of trace elements Zr and Er on heat-resistance of aluminum alloy wires[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2015, 40(7): 71-73.
[11]Kong Lingbao, Zhou Yanjun, Song Kexing, et al. Effect of aging on properties and nanoscale precipitates of Cu-Ag-Cr alloy[J]. Nanotechnology Reviews, 2020, 9(1): 70-78.
[12]陈媛媛, 王社则, 田博彤. 稀土Er对汽车轮毂用A356合金组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(11): 39-44.
Chen Yuanyuan, Wang Sheze, Tian Botong. Effect of rare earth Er on microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 alloy for automotive hub[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(11): 39-44.
[13]韩茜, 李英, 庞华, 等. 等温退火对8030铝合金导线组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(2): 154-160.
Han Qian, Li Ying, Pang Hua, et al. Effect of isothermal annealing on microstructure and properties of 8030 aluminum alloy wire[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(2): 154-160.
[14]Fedotov A I, Basyrov R Sh, Abdullazyanov R É, et al. Practical implementation of monitoring and ice melting on 110-120 kV overhead transmission lines based on the dip angle of the wire[J]. Power Technology and Engineering, 2019, 53(13): 508-515.
[15]贺帅超, 谭丽. 轨道电路合金导线的硬度及导电性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2016, 41(4): 91-95.
He Shuaichao, Tan Li. Hardness and electrical conductivity of alloy wire for track circuit[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2016, 41(4): 91-95.
[16]韩钰. 稀土微合金化高导电率耐热铝合金材料研究、表征及其微动磨损性能研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学(北京), 2017.
[17]Suo Xiaojing, Liao Hengcheng, Hu Yiyun, et al. Formation of Al₁₅Mn₃Si₂ phase during solidification of a novel Al-12%Si-4%Cu-1.2%Mn heat-resistant alloy and its thermal stability[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2018, 27(6): 2910-2920.
[18]Han Yu, Chen Baoan, Zhu Zhixiang, et al. Effects of Zr on microstructure and conductivity of Er containing heat-resistant aluminum alloy used for wires[J]. Materials Science Forum, 2016, 852: 205-210.
[19]闫志恒. 高导电率导线技术经济比较及导电率影响因素研究[D]. 保定: 华北电力大学, 2016.
[20]李健飞. 高导电率耐热合金形变热处理工艺研究[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2016.

Al-Er-Cu合金架空导线的导电性能

Conductive property of Al-Er-Cu alloy for overhead wire

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张子延, 陈君, 陈晓亚, 李全安, 刘建鑫. 固溶时效处理对Mg-4Sm-3Gd-0.5Zr合金显微组织和耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 10-16.
[2]	陈保安, 张静媛, 祝志祥, 韩钰, 潘学东, 张磊, 陈素红. 化学成分对高强Al-Mg-Si合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 30-38.
[3]	陈东俊, 李广阳, 刘刚. 时效处理对AlSi9Cu3压铸铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 53-56.
[4]	陈思君, 陈送义, 陈庚, 袁丁玲, 陈康华. Mg含量对2A14铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 86-92.
[5]	孙凯, 陈研, 杨绍斌. 时效温度对激光选区熔化TC21钛合金微观组织及硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 155-158.
[6]	胡静, 陶科, 杨庆松, 李刚, 张德汉. 机械抛光后的时效工艺对0Cr25Al5电热合金拉拔性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 171-177.
[7]	孙建, 黄贞益, 李景辉, 王萍. 固溶和时效处理对Fe-Mn-Al-C轻质钢组织和硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 34-38.
[8]	杨春苗, 王珊, 王淑慧, 李延珍, 刘文文. RRA过程中预时效时间对7A85铝合金组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 44-47.
[9]	姜中涛, 汪鑫, 周志明, 林海涛, 杨绪盛, 代芳芳. 双级固溶工艺对7050铝合金组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 102-106.
[10]	闵旭东, 黄元春, 肖政兵, 刘宇, 任贤魏, 邹倜. 预处理对汽车用Al-Mg-Si合金组织和晶间腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 78-85.
[11]	曾煜, 吴畏, 莫燕. 一种汽车发动机气阀用节镍型高温合金的固溶时效工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 188-192.
[12]	邱旭扬帆, 杨卓越, 丁雅莉. 提高Cr-Ni-Mo-Ti马氏体时效不锈钢超低温韧性的固溶处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 44-48.
[13]	崔岩, 董和谦, 曹雷刚, 杨越, 蒙毅. 55%SiC_p/2024Al复合材料时效过程的微观组织与力学性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 142-148.
[14]	马玉霞, 党淑娥, 陈慧琴. 固溶处理对Cu-Cr-Zr合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 163-166.
[15]	谭皎, 张伯岩, 朱文光, 孙巧艳. 时效温度对Ti-5Al-4Zr-10Mo-3Cr钛合金微观组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 217-225.