42CrMo4钢风电主轴的热处理工艺

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2021.08.038

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 某公司生产的42CrMo4钢风电空心主轴产品某一型号出现淬火开裂的比例较高,报废率近20%。用ARL8860直读光谱仪、MTS万能试验机、SANS冲击试验机、徕卡光学显微镜等对该产品进行一系列理化检验,并结合相关理论基础分析发现,将原淬火工艺优化为860 ℃加热后预冷至820 ℃浸水淬火,淬火水冷20 min,极大降低了产品开裂风险,为该企业解决了技术难点。860 ℃保温,预冷至820 ℃,水淬保持20 min,后经610 ℃高温回火处理,得到回火索氏体+粒状贝氏体+贝氏体铁素体条块的复相组织,性能满足抗拉强度＞700 MPa,-30 ℃冲击吸收能量＞40 J的要求。

关键词: 风电空心主轴, 42CrMo4钢, 淬火开裂, 热处理工艺优化, 显微组织

Abstract: A certain model of 42CrMo4 steel wind power hollow spindle products experienced high proportion of quenching cracking, and reached nearly 20% of rejection rate. So the heat treatment process for the products were optimized based on physical and chemical tests by using of ARL8860 direct reading spectrometer, MTS universal testing machine, SANS impact testing machine and Leica metallographic microscope, and combining with relevant theoretical basis. The experimental results show that the risk of product cracking can be greatly avoided by the optimized quenching process of heating at 860 ℃ and precooling to 820 ℃, then water cooling for 20 min which can solve the technique difficulty. The so-obtained multi-phase microstructure by quenching at 860 ℃, precooling to 820 ℃, then water cooling for 20 min and then tempering at 610 ℃ is composed of tempered sorbite+granular bainite+bainitic ferrite blocks, which can meet the performance requirements as R_m＞700 MPa, and KV₂(-30 ℃)＞40 J.

Key words: wind power hollow main shaft, 42CrMo4 steel, quenching cracking, heat treatment process optimization, microstructure

中图分类号:

TG162.71

史可庆, 郭甫, 安龙森, 陈云, 杜子阳, 武萌, 徐钦佩. 42CrMo4钢风电主轴的热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(8): 201-204.

Shi Keqing, Guo Fu, An Longsen, Chen Yun, Du Ziyang, Wu Meng, Xu Qinpei. Heat treatment process of 42CrMo4 steel wind power main shaft[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(8): 201-204.

参考文献

[1]史可庆, 刘哲, 刘永超. 风电主轴冲击试验不合格原因分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(6): 237-240.
Shi Keqing, Liu Zhe, Liu Yongchao. Disqualification cause analysis of wind turbine spindle in impact test[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(6): 237-240.
[2]史可庆, 蔺立元, 郭甫, 等. 模铸钢锭锻件UT缺陷分析[J]. 金属材料与冶金工程, 2019, 47(6): 58-61.
Shi Keqing, Lin Liyuan, Guo Fu, et al. Analysis of UT defects in forgings from die casting steel ingots[J]. Metal Materials and Metallurgy Engineering, 2019, 47(6): 58-61.
[3]史可庆, 蔺立元, 赵刚, 等. 42CrMo4钢锭镦粗裂纹的原因分析[J]. 热加工工艺, 2020, 49(3): 154-156.
Shi Keqing, Lin Liyuan, Zhao Gang, et al. Cause analysis of crack in 42CrMo4 steel ingot during upsetting[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2020, 49(3): 154-156.
[4]刘哲, 史可庆, 张青. 42CrMo4风电空心主轴数字化淬火设备的应用[J]. 热处理技术与装备, 2019, 40(4): 30-33.
Liu Zhe, Shi Keqing, Zhang Qing. Application of digital quenching equipment for 42CrMo4 wind power hollow spindle[J]. Heat Treatment Technology and Equipment, 2019, 40(4): 30-33.
[5]史可庆, 刘哲, 董双双, 等. 风电主轴强韧性的提高[J]. 理化检验(物理分册), 2019, 55(2): 84-88, 96.
Shi Keqing, Liu Zhe, Dong Shuangshuang, et al. Improvement of strength and toughness of wind power spindles[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis(Part A: Physical Testing), 2019, 55(2): 84-88, 96.
[6]史可庆. 淬火冷却速率对42CrMo4钢风电空心主轴的影响[J]. 热处理技术与装备, 2019, 40(3): 34-39.
Shi Keqing. Effect of quenching cooling rate on 42CrMo4 steel hollow spindle in wind power[J]. Heat Treatment Technology and Equipment, 2019, 40(3): 34-39.
[7]郭甫, 安龙森, 程林, 等. 风电主轴UT缺陷分析[J]. 热处理技术与装备, 2020, 41(4): 54-57.
Guo Fu, An Longsen, Cheng Lin, et al. Analysis on UT defects of wind turbine spindle[J]. Heat Treatment Technology and Equipment, 2020, 41(4): 54-57.
[8]蔺立元, 郭甫, 史可庆, 等. EAF电炉冶炼钢锭剖析[J]. 热处理技术与装备, 2020, 41(1): 5-10.
Lin Liyuan, Guo Fu, Shi Keqing, et al. Anatomy of EAF electric furnace smelting steel ingot[J]. Heat Treatment Technology and Equipment, 2020, 41(1): 5-10.
[9]李涛, 包喜荣, 杨慧. 42CrMo钢贝氏体转变的研究[J]. 包头钢铁学院学报, 2004(4): 321-325.
Li Tao, Bao Xirong, Yang Hui. Research of transformation of bainite in 42CrMo steel[J]. Journal of Baotou University of Iron and Steel Technology, 2004(4): 321-325.
[10]刘宗昌, 计云萍. 贝氏体组织结构辨识方法(一)[J]. 热处理技术与装备, 2018, 39(5): 1-7.
Liu Zongchang, Ji Yunping. Identification methods of bainitic microstructure(I)[J]. Heat Treatment Technology and Equipment, 2018, 39(5): 1-7.
[11]陈植雄, 左鹏鹏, 闵娜, 等. 4Cr5Mo2V钢贝氏体等温相变动力学[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2018, 39(5): 147-153.
Chen Zhixiong, Zuo Pengpeng, Min Na, et al. Bainite isothermal transformation kinetics of 4Cr5Mo2V steel[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2018, 39(5): 147-153.
[12]刘宗昌, 计云萍, 任慧平, 等. 碳含量对锯铝钢贝氏体组织形貌的影响[J]. 热处理, 2008(4): 19-25.
Liu Zongchang, Ji Yunping, Ren Huiping, et al. Effect of carbon content on bainite microstructure of chromium-molybdenum steels[J]. Heat Treatment, 2008(4): 19-25.

[1]	张子延, 陈君, 陈晓亚, 李全安, 刘建鑫. 固溶时效处理对Mg-4Sm-3Gd-0.5Zr合金显微组织和耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 10-16.
[2]	梁恩溥, 徐乐, 杨勇, 王毛球. 添加Al、Cu对40CrNi3MoV钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 17-23.
[3]	陈连生, 张露友, 田亚强, 杨子旋, 李红斌, 潘红波, 魏英立. 低碳高强舰船用钢的CCT曲线及其组织性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 63-68.
[4]	王琪, 吴光亮. 回火温度对1100 MPa级高强钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 146-150.
[5]	孙凯, 陈研, 杨绍斌. 时效温度对激光选区熔化TC21钛合金微观组织及硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 155-158.
[6]	刘文彬, 乔龙阳, 潘新宇, 程格, 李爱娜, 裴新军. 淬火温度对刀剪用M390粉末冶金不锈钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 189-195.
[7]	王瑞琴, 葛鹏, 廖强, 侯鹏, 刘宇. 固溶冷却方式对短时用高温钛合金板材组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 196-198.
[8]	王绍灼, 孟晗, 王芬, 樊海卫, 李燕, 唐超. 改善低氧TC4-LC及重熔TC4钛合金性能的热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 204-207.
[9]	张宁, 高星, 王芝林, 蒋波, 刘雅政. 18CrNiMo7-6钢齿轮组织性能异常分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 268-273.
[10]	王敬元, 吴松全, 张博华, 辛社伟, 杨义, 王皞, 黄爱军. 固溶时效处理对BT25y钛合金显微组织及硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 14-19.
[11]	孙建, 黄贞益, 李景辉, 王萍. 固溶和时效处理对Fe-Mn-Al-C轻质钢组织和硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 34-38.
[12]	王方军, 刘应龙, 时瑶, 万红, 刘斌斌. 等温退火处理对Inconel 625合金箔材组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 77-81.
[13]	张曼雪, 景然, 张雄, 张晴, 吴倩, 刘以柔. 铸态Ti-20Zr-10Nb-xMo合金的微观组织和耐腐蚀性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 147-150.
[14]	宁静, 高坤元, 李浩楠, 文胜平, 黄晖, 吴晓蓝, 魏午, 聂祚仁. 成分和冷却速度对Al-xEr合金凝固组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 151-154.
[15]	王荣, 龚玉辉, 殷学俊, 魏德强. 多道电子束扫描搭接率对40Cr钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 191-197.