表面淬火工艺对大型轴承套圈用42CrMo钢淬硬层的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.10.037

金属热处理 ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 218-223.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.10.037

表面淬火工艺对大型轴承套圈用42CrMo钢淬硬层的影响

魏世同¹, 吴长江^1,2, 郑雷刚¹, 胡小强¹, 陆善平¹

1.中国科学院金属研究所沈阳材料科学国家研究中心, 辽宁沈阳 110016;
2.沈阳工业大学材料科学与工程学院, 辽宁沈阳 110870

收稿日期:2022-06-10 修回日期:2022-08-09 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-12-15
作者简介:魏世同(1981—),男,副研究员,博士,主要研究方向为金属材料及热处理,E-mail:stwei@imr.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDC04010400,XDC04010403);江西省重大科技专项(20194ABC28011)

Effect of surface quenching process on hardened layer of 42CrMo steel for large bearing ring

Wei Shitong¹, Wu Changjiang^1,2, Zheng Leigang¹, Hu Xiaoqiang¹, Lu Shanping¹

1. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang Liaoning 110016, China;
2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang Liaoning 110870, China

Received:2022-06-10 Revised:2022-08-09 Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对42CrMo中碳轴承钢进行不同温度中频感应加热及淬火介质的表面淬火处理,并使用洛氏硬度计、光学显微镜、扫描电镜及透射电镜对淬火试样不同区域组织及硬度进行测试分析。结果表明,经表面淬火处理后,按硬度由大到小试样可分为淬硬区、过渡区及基体3个区域,随着表面淬火加热温度的升高,表面淬硬层的深度增加,并且相对于水淬,油淬的淬硬层深度显著减少。组织分析表明,水淬淬硬区组织均为马氏体,而油淬工艺由于冷速较慢,淬硬层组织为马氏体+铁素体组织,不同表面淬火工艺条件下过渡区组织均为马氏体+回火索氏体,基体为原始调质态的回火索氏体。淬硬区、过渡区及基体的组织差异导致不同区域的硬度差异。实际应用中应根据所需淬硬层深度选择合适的水淬加热温度。

关键词: 表面淬火, 淬硬层, 42CrMo轴承钢, 洛氏硬度, 微观组织

Abstract: 42CrMo medium carbon bearing steel was surface quenched with different temperatures and quenching mediums. Then the microstructure and hardness of different regions of the quenched specimens were tested and analyzed by means of Rockwell hardness tester, metallographic microscope, scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope. The results show that after surface quenching treatment, according to the hardness from large to small, the specimen can be divided into three different regions: hardened zone, transition zone and base material. The depth of surface hardened layer increases with the increase of surface quenching heating temperature, and that of oil quenching is significantly reduced compared with that of water quenching. Microstructure analysis shows that the microstructure in the water quenching hardened zones are all martensite, while the oil quenching has a slow cooling rate, which causes that the hardened zone is martensitic+ferrite. The transition zones under different surface quenching conditions are all martensite+tempering sorbite. Furthermore, the base material is the tempered sorbite in the original quenched and tempered state. Differences in the microstructure of hardened zone, transition zone and base material leads to differences in hardness in different regions. In practical applications, appropriate heating temperature for water quenching should be selected according to the required depth of the hardened layer.

Key words: surface quenching, hardened layer, 42CrMo bearing steel, Rockwell hardness, microstructure

中图分类号:

TG156.3

魏世同, 吴长江, 郑雷刚, 胡小强, 陆善平. 表面淬火工艺对大型轴承套圈用42CrMo钢淬硬层的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(10): 218-223.

Wei Shitong, Wu Changjiang, Zheng Leigang, Hu Xiaoqiang, Lu Shanping. Effect of surface quenching process on hardened layer of 42CrMo steel for large bearing ring[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(10): 218-223.

参考文献

[1]公平, 陈雪骑, 于庆杰, 等. 航空发动机中介轴承流场与润滑影响因素分析[J]. 轴承, 2021(8): 16-21.
Gong Ping, Chen Xueqi, Yu Qingjie, et al. Analysis on flow field and influencing factors of lubrication for aero-engine intermediate bearing[J]. Bearing, 2021(8): 16-21.
[2]霍新新, 范寿孝, 王森, 等. 大型抽水蓄能机组推力轴承运行特点研究[J]. 黑龙江电力, 2021, 43(3): 209-212, 240.
Huo Xinxin, Fan Shouxiao, Wang Sen, et al. Research on the operation characteristics of thrust bearings of large pumped storage unit[J]. Heilongjiang Electric Power, 2021, 43(3): 209-212, 240.
[3]曾志, 马德生. 大型风电机组变桨轴承套圈锻件性能研究[J]. 风能, 2021(8): 64-70.
Zeng Zhi, Ma Desheng. Study on the performance of rotor bearing ring forgings for large wind turbines[J]. Wind Energy, 2021(8): 64-70.
[4]黄旭就. 关于国内盾构机开发的探讨[J]. 装备制造技术, 2006(2): 3-7, 11.
Huang Xujiu. Discussion on shield machine development[J]. Equipment Manufacturing Technology, 2006(2): 3-7, 11.
[5]陈佳璋. 大直径(ϕ11.58 m)盾构机刀盘驱动装置用回转支承国产化的探讨[J]. 传动技术, 2010, 24(3): 25-28.
Chen Jiazhang. On approach of domestic swing bearing for large-diameter (ϕ11.58 m) shield machine cutter drives[J]. Drive System Technique, 2010, 24(3): 25-28.
[6]尤绍军. 我国轴承钢及热加工技术的现状和研究方向[J]. 金属热处理, 2012, 37(1): 119-125.
You Shaojun. Status and research directions of bearing steels and heat processes in China[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2012, 37(1): 119-125.
[7]刘雅政, 周乐育, 张朝磊, 等. 重大装备用高品质轴承用钢的发展及其质量控制[J]. 钢铁, 2013, 48(8): 1-8.
Liu Yazheng, Zhou Leyu, Zhang Chaolei, et al. Development and quality control of bearing steel for heavy equipment[J]. Iron and Steel, 2013, 48(8): 1-8.
[8]李欣, 李晓峰. 轴承零件表面淬火工艺探索[J]. 哈尔滨轴承, 2015, 36(4): 20-21, 28.
Li Xin, Li Xiaofeng. Exploration on surface hardening process of bearing parts[J]. Journal of Harbin Bearing, 2015, 36(4): 20-21, 28.
[9]王程, 刘杰, 顾彩香, 等. 两种表面淬火方法对结构钢热物性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(9): 214-218.
Wang Cheng, Liu Jie, Gu Caixiang, et al. Effects of two surface quenching methods on thermal properties of structural steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(9): 214-218.
[10]贾士武, 张爱茹. 减少机床导轨表面淬火畸变的措施[J]. 金属热处理, 2002, 27(1): 43-44.
Jia Shiwu, Zhang Airu. The way to reduce distortion of machine tool slide guide during surface hardening[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2002, 27(1): 43-44.
[11]Huang W H, Zhong H G, Lei L P, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of multi-pass forged and annealed 42CrMo steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2022, 831: 142191.
[12]刘雅政, 黄斌, 蒋波, 等. 盾构机轴承用钢的开发与质量控制[J]. 钢铁, 2004, 49(5): 1-6, 12.
Liu Yazheng, Huang Bin, Jiang Bo, et al. Development and quality control of bearing steel for tunnel shield machine[J]. Iron and Steel, 2004, 49(5): 1-6, 12.
[13]霍晓磊, 史亚妮, 李崇崇, 等. 大尺寸三排圆柱滚子转盘轴承滚道分面感应淬火工艺[J]. 轴承, 2019(2): 23-26.
Huo Xiaolei, Shi Yani, Li Chongchong, et al. Faceted induction hardening process for raceway of large scale three row cylindrical roller slewing bearings[J]. Bearing, 2019(2): 23-26.
[14]霍晓磊, 李崇崇, 史亚妮, 等. 沟道位置不对称四点接触球轴承滚道表面淬火工艺研究[J]. 热处理技术与装备, 2018, 39(1): 49-51.
Huo Xiaolei, Li Chongchong, Shi Yani, et al. Development and quality control of bearing steel for tunnel shield machine[J]. Heat Treatment Technology and Equipment, 2018, 39(1): 49-51.
[15]史亚妮, 霍晓磊, 朱战旗, 等. 推力球轴承沟道表面感应淬火工艺的改进[J]. 轴承, 2018(6): 24-25.
Shi Yani, Huo Xiaolei, Zhu Zhanqi, et al. Improvement on surface induction quenching process for raceway of thrust ball bearings[J]. Bearing, 2018(6): 24-25.

表面淬火工艺对大型轴承套圈用42CrMo钢淬硬层的影响

Effect of surface quenching process on hardened layer of 42CrMo steel for large bearing ring

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	钟立伟, 冯朝辉, 高文理, 陈军洲, 陆政. 多轴锻造与T852热处理对Al-Cu-Li合金组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(9): 79-86.
[2]	温方明, 郝晓博, 曹恒, 张强, 李渤渤, 刘茵琪. 热处理工艺对N06600合金热轧板组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(9): 113-118.
[3]	姜越, 朱柏祥, 李秀明, 谭亚平. CrFeCoNiB_0.05Ti_x高熵合金的显微组织和力学性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(8): 58-62.
[4]	刘德佳, 扎学安, 王伟雄, 唐延川, 赵龙志, 徐宏明. 304/Q235复合板多主元高熵化焊缝的组织与性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(8): 63-70.
[5]	宋宁宏, 林超, 毕文珍, 王武荣, 韦习成. 回火时间对1800 MPa级热成形钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(8): 112-117.
[6]	李向川, 杨吉春, 白国君, 樊志明. 热处理对U76CrRE稀土重轨钢夹杂物和微观组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(8): 200-210.
[7]	王军, 何博, 雷益宇, 贾文静, 兰亮, 高双. 增材制造钛合金激光喷丸组织及热稳定性研究进展[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(8): 242-248.
[8]	侯瑾睿, 鲁若定, 卜少聪, 许帅领, 傅丽华, 田保红. 退火温度对AlCrMnFeNiCu_0.8高熵合金组织与耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 52-57.
[9]	樊立峰, 亢泽, 贾丽英, 徐惠敏, 高军. 淬火后的逆相变退火温度对5%Mn冷轧中锰钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 92-97.
[10]	许荣昌, 王毅, 孙宗辉, 李辉. 热处理对含Mo轴承钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 125-128.
[11]	蒋明忠, 赵勇, 潘钱付, 吴裕, 王馨敏, 蒋文龙. F/M钢包壳管材热处理工艺优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 25-32.
[12]	李晓琛, 王世颖, 华天宇, 陈智栋. 深冷处理对TC4钛合金退火过程中微观组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 46-53.
[13]	王彬, 魏宝民. 退火温度对T4镀锡板组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 115-118.
[14]	吕周晋, 李好峰, 车立达, 吴战芳, 翟一多, 崔晓敏, 李向阳. HIP温度对SLM制备TC4钛合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 138-142.
[15]	周子民, 熊声健, 陈皓晖, 李彰, 王长亮, 郭孟秋, 崔秀芳, 金国. 热喷涂工艺对NiCrFeAl/hBN复合涂层性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 208-215.