高温短时固溶处理对超高强Al-Zn-Mg-Cu合金锻件组织与性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.07.004

金属热处理 ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7): 20-26.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.07.004

高温短时固溶处理对超高强Al-Zn-Mg-Cu合金锻件组织与性能的影响

王少华^1,2, 钟立伟^1,2, 马志锋^1,2

1.中国航发北京航空材料研究院铝合金研究所, 北京 100095;
2.中国航发北京航空材料研究院北京市先进铝合金材料及应用工程技术研究中心, 北京 100095

收稿日期:2022-02-20 修回日期:2022-05-13 出版日期:2022-07-25 发布日期:2022-08-12
作者简介:王少华(1983—),男,高级工程师,博士,主要研究方向为高强铝合金,E-mail:shaohuawang1983@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51374187)

Effect of high-temperature short-time solution treatment on microstructure and properties of ultra-high strength Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy forging

Wang Shaohua^1,2, Zhong Liwei^1,2, Ma Zhifeng^1,2

1. Institute of Aluminum Alloy, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China;
2. Beijing Engineering Research Center of Advanced Aluminum Alloys and Applications, AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China

Received:2022-02-20 Revised:2022-05-13 Online:2022-07-25 Published:2022-08-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用光学显微镜、扫描电镜和拉伸试验机研究了高温短时固溶处理温度(475~480 ℃)与时间(0~7 min)对高合金化Al-Zn-Mg-Cu合金锻件组织与性能的影响。结果表明,高温短时固溶处理可有效提高时效态Al-Zn-Mg-Cu合金锻件的抗拉强度及断后伸长率。随着温度或时间的增加,晶界粗大残留第二相逐渐回溶至铝基体,当温度过高或时间过长时,等轴状晶粒发生粗化,组织发生过烧现象。经对比分析并结合实际生产状况,确定最适合的高温短时固溶处理制度为475 ℃×3 min。采用此制度时锻件45°方向抗拉强度最低,为685 MPa,LT向断后伸长率最低,为4.7%。

关键词: Al-Zn-Mg-Cu合金, 高温短时固溶, 组织, 性能

Abstract: Effect of high-temperature short-time solution treatment (temperature of 475-480 ℃ and time of 0-7 min) on microstructure and properties of high alloying Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy forging was studied by means of optical microscope, scanning electron microscope and room temperature tensile test. The results show that high-temperature short-time solution treatment can effectively improve the tensile strength and elongation of as-aged Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy forging. With the increase of temperature or time, the coarse retained second phase at the grain boundary gradually dissolves back into the aluminum matrix. When the temperature is too high or the time is too long, the equiaxed grains coarsen and the microstructure burns over. Through comparative analysis and combined with the actual production situation, it is determined that the most suitable high-temperature short-time solution treatment is 475 ℃ for 3 min, under which the minimum tensile strength of the forging is 680 MPa in the 45° direction and the lowest elongation is 4.7% in LT direction.

Key words: Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy, high-temperature short-time solution treatment, microstructure, property

中图分类号:

TG146.2

王少华, 钟立伟, 马志锋. 高温短时固溶处理对超高强Al-Zn-Mg-Cu合金锻件组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 20-26.

Wang Shaohua, Zhong Liwei, Ma Zhifeng. Effect of high-temperature short-time solution treatment on microstructure and properties of ultra-high strength Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy forging[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(7): 20-26.

参考文献

[1]Dursun T, Soutis C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys[J]. Materials and Design, 2014, 56: 862-871.
[2]唐丽娜, 郭立杰, 张天德. 航天典型材料与构件的热处理技术研究与应用[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(1): 1-5.
Tan Lina, Guo Lijie, Zhang Tiande. Research and application of heat treatment technology for aerospace materials and components[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(1): 1-5.
[3]王少华, 马志峰, 张显峰, 等. 7A99铝合金锻件双级时效组织性能[J]. 航空材料学报, 2018, 38(1): 54-59.
Wang Shaohua, Ma Zhifeng, Zhang Xianfeng, et al. Microstructure and properties of 7A99 aluminum alloy forging after two-step aging treatment [J]. Journal of Aeronautical Materials, 2018, 38(1): 54-59.
[4]王淑慧, 王珊, 隋信举, 等. 7A75铝合金板材厚度方向的微观结构及性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(9): 191-195.
Wang Shuhui, Wang Shan, Sui Xinju, et al. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties at different thickness of 7A75 aluminum alloy plate[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(9): 191-195.
[5]Li Bo, Pan Qinglin, Chen Congping, et al. Effects of solution treatment on microstructural and mechanical properties of Al-Zn-Mg alloy by microalloying with Sc and Zr[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, 664: 553-564.
[6]刘文义, 胡小会, 李军. 7085超高强铝合金的研究进展[J]. 热加工工艺, 2021, 50(8): 10-14.
Liu Wenyi, Hu Xiaohui, Li Jun. Research progress of 7085 ultra-high strength aluminum alloy[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2021, 50(8): 10-14.
[7]Zhang Cunsheng, Zhang Zhaogang, Liu Mingfu, et al. Effects of single- and multi-stage solid solution treatments on microstructure and properties of as-extruded AA7055 helical profile[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2021, 31: 1885-1901.
[8]冯朝辉, 钟立伟, 高文理, 等. 时效制度对2050铝锂合金力学性能及断裂行为的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(9): 108-111.
Feng Zhaohui, Zhong Liwei, Gao Wenli, et al. Effect of aging on mechanical properties and fracture behavior of 2050 Al-Li alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(9): 108-111.
[9]王俭堂, 朱聪聪, 高文理, 等. 2297铝锂合金拉伸性能及强化机制[J]. 稀有金属与硬质合金, 2019, 47(1): 55-59.
Wang Jiantang, Zhu Congcong, Gao Wenli, et al. Tensile property and strengthening mechanism of 2297 Al-Li alloy[J]. Rare Metals and Cemented Carbides, 2019, 47(1): 55-59.
[10]Xu D K, Rometsch P A, Birbilis N. Improved solution treatment for an as-rolled Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Part Ⅱ. Microstructure and mechanical properties[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2012, 534: 244-252.
[11]徐戊矫, 龚利华, 王玉松, 等. 强化固溶对7050铝合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2015, 40(4): 57-60.
Xu Wujiao, Gong Lihua, Wang Yusong, et al. Effect of strengthening-solid-solution on microstructure and properties of 7050 aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2015, 40(4): 57-60.
[12]赵建吉, 许晓静, 谈成, 等. 强化固溶处理对7085铝合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2015, 36(11): 101-105.
Zhao Jianji, Xu Xiaojing, Tan Cheng, et al. Effect of enhanced-solid-solution process on microstructure and properties of 7085 aluminum alloy[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2015, 36(11): 101-105.
[13]Sokolowski J H, Sun X C, Byczynski G, et al. The removal of copper-phase segregation and the subsequent improvement in mechanical properties of cast 319 aluminum alloys by a two-stage solution heat treatment[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1995, 53: 385-392.
[14]李国爱, 张坤, 陆政, 等. 固溶温度对Al-11.7Zn-2.2Mg-2.0Cu-0.12Zr铝合金组织及性能的影响[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2016, 45(4): 1040-1044.
Li Guoai, Zhang Kun, Lu Zheng, et al. Effects of solution temperature on microstructure and properties of Al-11.7Zn-2.2Mg-2.0Cu-0.12Zr aluminum alloy[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2016, 45(4): 1040-1044.
[15]Zhang Zhiqiang, Yu Jianhao, He Dongye. Effect of contact solid solution treatment on peak aging of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2020, 9(3): 6940-6943.
[16]Xu Xiaojing, Mao Qiang, Jiang Ze, et al. Effect of multi-stage solution and aging process on microstructure and properties of Al-11.2Zn-3.0Mg-1.3Cu-0.2Zr aluminum alloy extrusion[J]. Materials Letters, 2019, 254: 375-378.
[17]Yang X B, Chen J H, Liu J Z, et al. Spherical constituent particles formed by a multistage solution treatment in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys[J]. Materials Characterization, 2013, 83: 79-88.
[18]Zhong Liwei, Gao Wenli, Feng Zhaohui, et al. Hot deformation characterization of as-homogenized Al-Cu-Li X2A66 alloy through processing maps and microstructural evolution[J]. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2019, 35: 2409-2421.
[19]宁爱林, 曾苏民, 蒋寿生, 等. 7A04铝合金高温固溶的微观组织和力学性能[J]. 轻合金加工技术, 2005, 33(5): 48-51.
Nin Ailin, Zeng Sumin, Jiang Shousheng, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of 7A04 aluminum alloy in higher temperature solid solution[J]. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology, 2005, 33(5): 48-51.
[20]Rometsch P A, Zhang Y, Knight S. Heat treatment of 7××× series aluminum alloys-Some recent developments[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2014, 24(7): 2003-2017.
[21]Dai Pan, Luo Xian, Yang Yanqing, et al. Nano-scale precipitate evolution and mechanical properties of 7085 aluminum alloy during thermal exposure[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2018, 729: 411-422.

高温短时固溶处理对超高强Al-Zn-Mg-Cu合金锻件组织与性能的影响

Effect of high-temperature short-time solution treatment on microstructure and properties of ultra-high strength Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy forging

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜超, 贾东永, 周志勇, 田政, 郭星晔, 王哲, 韩修柱. 激光选区熔化高强铝合金件的热处理及空间环境性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 1-8.
[2]	童锐, 于兴福, 刘永宝, 夏云志, 苏勇, 金映丽. 轴承用8Cr4Mo4V钢真空气淬及等温盐浴淬火后的性能对比分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 9-14.
[3]	张博涵, 李浩楠, 高鹏冲, 乔桂英, 刘杰兵, 肖福仁. 分级淬火对高铬铸铁轧辊组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 15-19.
[4]	田紫维, 姚彦欣, 刘佳兴, 王智怡, 胡章权, 蒋波. 冷却速度对微合金化中碳非调质钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 27-33.
[5]	钟修杨, 邓同生, 朱志云, 李尚, 钟明, 郭涛. 时效处理对稀土钪微合金化钛合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 40-46.
[6]	韦小园, 魏午, 郭骁, 程志强, 文胜平, 石薇, 黄晖. 退火处理对含铒Al-6Mg-1Mn铝合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 47-51.
[7]	侯瑾睿, 鲁若定, 卜少聪, 许帅领, 傅丽华, 田保红. 退火温度对AlCrMnFeNiCu_0.8高熵合金组织与耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 52-57.
[8]	张明军, 李远, 李相辉. 热等静压工艺对K4125镍基高温合金显微组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 71-75.
[9]	樊帅奇, 李海涛, 王雪松, 张蕾涛, 徐金富, 戴姣燕. 放电等离子烧结CuIn₅合金的工艺优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 76-80.
[10]	孙浩, 宋文乐, 王磊, 薛志勇, 詹花茂. 新型Fe_72.7Si₁₇B_6.8Nb_2.6Cu_0.9纳米晶铁芯的磁场热处理工艺与软磁性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 81-85.
[11]	王华, 王泽钰, 宋嘉明, 瞿宗宏, 赖运金, 梁书锦. 固溶处理对粉末冶金GH4099合金组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 86-91.
[12]	樊立峰, 亢泽, 贾丽英, 徐惠敏, 高军. 淬火后的逆相变退火温度对5%Mn冷轧中锰钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 92-97.
[13]	于晃, 王飞宇, 包翠敏, 王全振, 陈炜, 曲德毅, 蒋申柱, 马煜林. 真空时效加热到温时间滞后现象对FV520B钢组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 98-101.
[14]	陈波, 张继国, 华永兴, 尹树春, 吴磊, 梁振威, 孙扩. 高端车用热成形钢CR300MB的研发与应用[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 107-113.
[15]	付锡彬, 孟少博, 刘文胜, 张可, 李昭东, 曹燕光, 章小峰, 雍岐龙. 固溶处理对Fe-30Mn-10Al-1C低密度钢组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 114-119.