筒节淬火界面换热系数求解方法对比

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2023.10.043

金属热处理 ›› 2023, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (10): 279-284.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2023.10.043

筒节淬火界面换热系数求解方法对比

蒋竹凌^1,2, 张万良^1,2, 夏彬^1,2

1.中国船舶科学研究中心, 江苏无锡 214082;
2.深海技术科学太湖实验室, 江苏无锡 214123

收稿日期:2023-04-25 修回日期:2023-08-03 出版日期:2023-10-25 发布日期:2023-12-07
作者简介:蒋竹凌(1993—),女,工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为热处理数值模拟, E-mail:jzhuling@126.com

Comparison of solving methods of interfacial heat transfer coefficient for shell ring quenching

Jiang Zhuling^1,2, Zhang Wanliang^1,2, Xia Bin^1,2

1. China Ship Science Research Center, Wuxi Jiangsu 214082, China;
2. Taihu Lake Laboratory of Deep Sea Technology and Science, Wuxi Jiangsu 214123, China

Received:2023-04-25 Revised:2023-08-03 Online:2023-10-25 Published:2023-12-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以压力容器筒节为研究对象,基于中空圆柱热传导差分方程,采用温差直接法和温度迭代法,建立换热系数求解的数学模型。根据筒节的实测冷却曲线,通过非线性温度迭代法和温差直接法求解界面换热系数随淬火时间变化曲线,模拟筒节试件淬火过程温度场,对比试验值与两种方法模拟值的误差,验证温差直接法的可靠性,并比较温度迭代法与温差直接法的差异。结果表明,两种方法的温度模拟结果误差都在18%以内且差距不大,但温差直接法的准确性优于温度迭代法。

关键词: 换热系数, 筒节, 淬火, 温差直接法, 温度迭代法, 反传热问题

Abstract: Shell ring of pressure vessel was taken as a research subject. Based on the heat conduction equation for a hollow cylinder, direct method of temperature difference and temperature iteration method were proposed and a mathematical model for heat transfer coefficient was established. Through the tested temperature cooling curves, change curves of interfacial hear transfer coefficient with quenching time were calculated by using temperature iteration method and direct method of temperature difference. By simulating the temperature field and comparing the tested and simulated results, the reliability of direct method of temperature difference was verified, and the difference of accuracy between two methods was analyzed. The results show that the error percentage of two methods between the tested and simulated values are within 18%, and the direct method of temperature difference is more accurate than the temperature iteration method.

Key words: heat transfer coefficient, shell ring, quenching, direct method of temperature difference, temperature iteration method, inverse heat transfer problem

中图分类号:

TG156.34

蒋竹凌, 张万良, 夏彬. 筒节淬火界面换热系数求解方法对比[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(10): 279-284.

Jiang Zhuling, Zhang Wanliang, Xia Bin. Comparison of solving methods of interfacial heat transfer coefficient for shell ring quenching[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2023, 48(10): 279-284.

参考文献

[1]王葛, 朱国善, 高静娜, 等. 4130X钢大直径厚壁压力气瓶喷水淬火数值模拟[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2015, 36(7): 250-256.
Wang Ge, Zhu Guoshan, Gao Jingna, et al. Numerical simulation of flow and temperature fields in spray quenching process of large-diameter thick-walled 4130X steel gas cylinder[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2015, 36(7): 250-256.
[2]王凯, 石伟, 王罡. 基于有限元模拟的换热系数计算方法[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2018, 39(10): 112-118, 132.
Wang Kai, Shi Wei, Wang Gang. Calculation method of heat transfer coefficient based on finite element simulation[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2018, 39(10): 112-118, 132.
[3]Alex Stéphane Bongo Njeng, Stéphane Vitu, Clausse Marc, et al. Wall-to-solid heat transfer coefficient in flighted rotary kilns: Experimental determination and modeling[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2018, 91: 197-213.
[4]Bouissa Y, Shahriari D, Champliaud H, et al. Prediction of heat transfer coefficient during quenching of large size forged blocks using modeling and experimental validation[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2019, 13: 100379.
[5]Onyango T, Ingham D B, Lesnic D. Inverse reconstruction of boundary condition coefficients in one-dimensional transient heat conduction[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2009, 207(2): 569-575.
[6]Maciejewska B, StraK K, Piasecka M. The solution of a two-dimensional inverse heat transfer problem using the Trefftz method[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 157: 82-88.
[7]顾剑锋, 潘健生, 胡明娟. 淬火冷却过程中表面综合换热系数的反传热分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 1998, 32(2): 19-22.
Gu Jianfeng, Pan Jiansheng, Hu Mingjuan. Inverse heat conduction analysis of synthetical surface heat transfer coefficient during quenching process[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1998, 32(2): 19-22.
[8]徐戎, 李落星. 介质流量密度对铝合金喷射淬火界面热交换率的影响规律及机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 243-249.
Xu Rong, Li Luoxing. Influence law and mechanism of medium flow density on heat exchange rate of jet quenching interface of aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(2): 243-249.
[9]徐戎, 李落星, 王震虎. 铝合金水射流参数对淬火界面传热行为的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(8): 246-252.
Xu Rong, Li Luoxing, Wang Zhenhu. Effect of water jet parameters on heat transfer behavior at quenching interface of aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(8): 246-252.
[10]隋佳丽, 李新生, 肖桂勇, 等. 淬火介质表面换热系数的计算方法与应用[J]. 热加工工艺, 2023, 52(14): 137-141.
Sui Jiali, Li Xinsheng, Xiao Guiyong, et al. Calculation method and application of surface heat transfer coefficient of quenching medium[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2023, 52(14): 137-141.
[11]曹瑞, 孙会. 淬火过程数值模拟技术的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2015, 29(5): 140-144.
Cao Rui, Sun Hui. Progress of research on numerical simulation of quenching process[J]. Materials Review, 2015, 29(5): 140-144.
[12]牛山廷, 赵国群, 李辉平. 淬火冷却过程三维反传热有限元分析中优化方法对计算效率的影响[J]. 中国机械工程, 2006, 17(S1): 318-322.
Niu Shanting, Zhao Guoqun, Li Huiping. Study on the influence of optimization methods on the computation efficiency in inverse heat conduction analysis with 3D FEM during quenching process[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2006, 17(S1): 318-322.
[13]李自良, 王利, 刘美红, 等. 雾化气体淬火过程换热系数的计算及实验研究[J]. 热加工工艺, 2016, 45(16): 203-207.
Li Ziliang, Wang Li, Liu Meihong, et al. Calculation and experimental research of heat transfer coefficient in atomized gas quenching process[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2016, 45(16): 203-207.

[1]	崔毅, 崔继红, 王艳, 张雲飞, 俞峰, 赵英利, 曹文全. 淬火工艺对GCr4Mo4V钢组织及耐磨性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 23-29.
[2]	王毅, 韩杰, 刘超, 邓玲蕊, 李辉, 许荣昌. DQ-T工艺对1000 MPa级高强钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 30-34.
[3]	李德明, 雷宁宁, 张晋刚, 宫涛, 周广浩. 快速回火对690 MPa级别工程机械用钢板组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 75-80.
[4]	明章生, 赵杰, 栗克建, 曹鹏军, 朱斌, 冯毅. 强烈淬火工艺制备超高强韧钢的应用展望[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 81-87.
[5]	姜影, 杜水明, 黄俏梅, 沈子达, 游菲. 淬火工艺对42CrMo钢刀毂淬硬层深度及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 88-91.
[6]	王敬伟, 范梅香, 林乙丑, 石如星, 席志永, 刘志刚. 轧机导卫架端头异形截面的感应淬火工艺及畸变控制[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 122-125.
[7]	宋操, 王晓东, 包喜荣, 陈林, 汤雪娇. Ce对30MnNbRE钢淬火回火微观组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 143-149.
[8]	马正和, 阿达依·谢尔亚孜旦, 刘俊杰, 古丽·尼尕尔. 45钢的激光淬火温度场与相变硬化区[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 258-264.
[9]	张海英, 文超, 白玲, 蔡益新. 风电内齿圈感应淬火裂纹形成原因及改进方法[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 288-292.
[10]	张磊, 米佩, 马春亮, 孙永鹏. 太阳轮渗碳淬火裂纹产生的原因分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 293-296.
[11]	牛旭, 刘越, 王灼, 张雅静, 刘平祥. 钒含量对秸秆膨化机螺杆用Cr20高铬铸铁组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 8-15.
[12]	齐羿, 杨建全, 焦斐. 合金钢连杆在不同冷却介质中淬火后的组织与性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 64-71.
[13]	刘绪玮, 汪志刚, 林杰, 尹铁淇, 叶洁云, 张迎晖. 临界区淬火工艺对Cr-Ti-B系微碳钢组织及织构的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 72-79.
[14]	张志勇, 石如星, 殷立涛, 庞庆海, 冷婉晴, 徐流杰. 贝氏体基高硅高钒高速钢等温淬火制备及组织特点[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 87-93.
[15]	李玲, 刘旭科, 孟庆宇, 刘少军, 李陶陶, 高阳. 30CrMnSi钢离子渗氮-激光淬火复合处理改性层的性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 185-189.

筒节淬火界面换热系数求解方法对比

Comparison of solving methods of interfacial heat transfer coefficient for shell ring quenching

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价