HiB与CGO取向硅钢的对比及其常化退火工艺

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.01.037

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从化学成分体系、生产工艺流程等角度详细分析了一般取向硅钢(CGO钢)和高磁感取向硅钢(HiB钢)的主要区别,并开展了HiB钢常化退火工艺的实验室研究和工业化试制。结果表明,由CGO钢转型生产HiB钢的难点主要是常化退火工艺的制定。实验室常化退火最优工艺为退火温度1120 ℃,退火时间4 min,空冷温度900 ℃。HiB钢热轧和常化退火后的显微组织类型均为铁素体,HiB钢常化退火后的显微组织主要是沿轧制方向分布的再结晶晶粒。工业化试制HiB钢常化退火后的主要织构类型为高斯织构{110}<001>及铜型织构{112}<111>。

关键词: 取向硅钢, 显微组织, 织构, 常化退火

Abstract: Main differences between common oriented silicon steel (CGO) and high magnetic induction oriented silicon steel (HiB) were analyzed in detail from the perspective of chemical composition system and production process, and the laboratory research of normalizing annealing process and industrial trial production of the HiB steel were carried out. The results show that the main difficulty in transforming the production of the CGO steel to the HiB steel is the formulation of normalizing annealing process. The optimal laboratory normalizing annealing process of the HiB steel is the annealing temperature of 1120 ℃, annealing time of 4 min, and air cooling temperature from 900 ℃. The microstructure of the HiB steel after hot rolling and normalizing annealing is ferrite, and the microstructure after normalized annealing is mainly recrystallized grains distributed along the rolling direction. The main texture types of the industrial trial-produced HiB steel after normalizing annealing are Goss texture {110}<001> and copper texture {112}<111>.

Key words: oriented silicon steel, microstructure, texture, normalizing annealing

中图分类号:

TG142

杨源远, 王栋, 黄利, 刘宝志. HiB与CGO取向硅钢的对比及其常化退火工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 228-234.

Yang Yuanyuan, Wang Dong, Huang Li, Liu Baozhi. Comparison of HiB and CGO orientation silicon steels and its normalizing annealing process[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(1): 228-234.

参考文献

[1]毛卫民, 杨平. 电工钢的材料学原理[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2013: 346-371.
[2]何忠治. 电工钢[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 1996: 23.
[3]Maazi N, Rouag N, Etter A L, et al. Influence of neighbourhood on abnormal Goss grain growth in Fe-3%Si steels: Formation of island grains in the large growing grain[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2006, 55(7): 641-644.
[4]张继舜, 任慧平, 金自力, 等. 含铜低温取向硅钢轧制过程中的组织及织构演变[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(4): 80-84.
Zhang Jishun, Ren Huiping, Jin Zili, et al. Microstructure and texture evolution of Cu-containing low temperature oriented silicon steel during rolling process[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(4): 80-84.
[5]刘璐, 张宁, 杨平, 等. 高硅钢近柱状晶初始组织的形变、再结晶行为及磁性能[J]. 工程科学学报, 2015, 37(7): 919-923.
Liu Lu, Zhang Ning, Yang Ping, et al. Deformation, recrystallization behaviors and magnetic properties of high silicon steel with an initial near columnar-grained structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2015, 37(7): 919-923.
[6]付勇军, 蒋奇武, 杨平, 等. 脱碳退火保温时间对取向硅钢组织、织构及磁性能的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2015, 36(7): 157-161.
Fu Yongjun, Jiang Qiwu, Yang Ping, et al. Effect of holding time of decarburization annealing on microstructure, textures and magnetic properties of grain oriented silicon steel[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2015, 36(7): 157-161.
[7]Matsuo M, Sakai T, Suga Y. Origin and development of through-the-thickness variations of texture in the processing of grain-oriented silicon steel[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1986, 17(8): 1313-1322.
[8]Inokuti Y, Maeda C, Ito Y, et al. Transmission kossel study of origin of Goss texture in grain oriented silicon steel[J]. Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, 1983, 23(5): 440-449.
[9]骆新根, 黄咸波, 郭小龙, 等. 冷轧压下率对薄规格取向硅钢冷轧和退火织构的影响[J]. 电工钢, 2019(2): 21-24.
Luo Xingen, Huang Xianbo, Guo Xiaolong, et al. Effect of cold rolling reduction rate on cold rolling and annealing texture of thin oriented silicon steel[J]. Electrical Steel, 2019(2): 21-24.
[10]杨平, 王子良, 刘恭涛, 等. 含铜取向硅钢磁性能波动成因分析[J]. 工程科学学报, 2020, 40(2): 200-207.
Yang Ping, Wang Ziliang, Liu Gongtao, et al. Analyses of magnetic properties fluctuation in conventional grain oriented silicon steels containing copper[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2020, 40(2): 200-207.
[11]卢振敏. 冷轧取向硅钢织构的演变规律及模拟分析[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2009.
[12]樊立峰, 项利, 唐广波, 等. 低温高磁感取向硅钢高温退火过程高斯晶粒的演变[J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2014, 36(3): 328-332.
Fan Lifeng, Xiang Li, Tang Guangbo, et al. Evolution of Goss grains during high-temperature annealing in high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel with slab reheating at low temperature[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2014, 36(3): 328-332.
[13]高建文, 赵刚, 唐刚. 低温渗氮HiB钢的二次再结晶行为[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2016, 28(10): 69-74.
Gao Jianwei, Zhao Gang, Tang Gang. Secondary recrystallization behavior of low temperature nitriding HiB steel[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2016, 28(10): 69-74.
[14]刘国平, 王海军, 陈浩, 等. 普通取向硅钢轧制过程中组织和织构的演变[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2014, 26(11): 11-14.
Liu Guoping, Wang Haijun, Chen Hao, et al. Evolutions of microstructures and textures in grain-oriented silicon steel during rolling process[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2014, 26(11): 11-14.
[15]吕科, 李军, 赵宇. 无抑制剂取向硅钢的再结晶织构与析出物[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2015, 27(8): 44-47.
Zhang Xiaojuan, Wang Junxi, Bai Lu, et al. Mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of steam oxidized T-250 steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(1): 234-241.
Lü Ke, Li Jun, Zhao Yu. Textures and precipitates of grain-oriented silicon steel without inhibitor[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2015, 27(8): 44-47.
[16]肖丽俊, 王海军, 项利, 等. 薄板坯连铸连轧工艺下Hi-B钢的组织及织构[J]. 工程科学学报, 2016, 38(2): 242-246.
Xiao Lijun, Wang Haijun, Xiang Li, et al. Microstructure and texture of Hi-B steel produced by TSCR process[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 242-246.
[17]李霞, 杨平, 贾志伟, 等. 低温取向硅钢常化工艺和渗氮工艺对组织、织构和磁性能的影响[J]. 工程科学学报, 2019, 41(5): 610-617.
Li Xia, Yang Ping, Jia Zhiwei, et al. Effects of normalizing process and nitriding process on the microstructure, texture, and magnetic properties in low-temperature grain-oriented silicon steel[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2019, 41(5): 610-617.
[18]许占一, 沙玉辉, 张芳, 等. 取向硅钢二次再结晶过程中的取向选择行为[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(8): 610-617.
Xu Zhanyi, Sha Yuhui, Zhang Fang, et al. Orientation selection behavior during secondary recrystallization in grain-oriented silicon steel[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2020, 56(8): 610-617.