H11钢大型压铸模块真空气淬的数值模拟与试验

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.02.037

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 227-235.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.02.037

H11钢大型压铸模块真空气淬的数值模拟与试验

陈浩, 涂宇杰, 蒋志鹏, 吴晓春

上海大学材料科学与工程学院省部共建高品质特殊钢冶金与制备国家重点实验室, 上海 200072

收稿日期:2023-08-29 修回日期:2024-01-05 出版日期:2024-03-27 发布日期:2024-03-27
通讯作者: 吴晓春,教授,博士生导师, E-mail:wuxiaochun@shu.edu.cn
作者简介:陈浩(1997—),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为热作模具钢,E-mail:my.988@163.com。
基金资助:
省部共建高品质特殊钢冶金与制备国家重点实验室自主课题(SKLASS 2022-Z12)

Numerical simulation and experiment on vacuum gas quenching of H11 steel large die cast module

Chen Hao, Tu Yujie, Jiang Zhipeng, Wu Xiaochun

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China

Received:2023-08-29 Revised:2024-01-05 Online:2024-03-27 Published:2024-03-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用数值模拟与试验相结合的方法研究了淬火压力对H11钢大模块(500 mm×500 mm×500 mm)真空气淬过程中的温度场、组织场和应力场的影响。结果表明,更大的淬火压力具有更好的冷却效果,但与此同时也会造成更大的淬火应力从而增加模块开裂的风险。模块整体的冷速随着淬火压力的增加而加快,在高温相变区(600~800 ℃),8 bar淬火压力模块心部的最大冷速为0.20 ℃/s,比4 bar淬火压力高0.06 ℃/s。8 bar和4 bar淬火压力下模块的最大应力分别为655 MPa和437 MPa。通过试验验证得知,4 bar淬火压力下模块心部出现了沿晶碳化物,故H11钢大模块真空气淬的过程中在600~800 ℃其心部冷速至少要≥0.16 ℃/s。

关键词: H11钢, 大模块, 气体淬火, 数值模拟

Abstract: Effect of quenching pressure on temperature field, microstructure field and stress field of the H11 steel module (500 mm×500 mm×500 mm) during air quenching were studied by combining numerical simulation with experiment. The results show that greater quenching pressure, better cooling effect, but at the same time, it also causes greater quenching stress which can increase the risk of cracking. The overall cooling rate of the module increases as the quenching pressure increases, in the high temperature transformation zone (600-800 ℃), the maximum cooling rate of the module core under quenching pressure of 8 bar is 0.20 ℃/s, which is 0.06 ℃/s higher than that of 4 bar. The maximum stress of the module under quenching pressure of 8 bar and 4 bar is 655 MPa and 437 MPa, respectively. Through experiment verification, the carbides precipitated along the grain boundary appear in the core of the module under quenching pressure of 4 bar, therefore during the gas quenching process of H11 steel large modules, the cooling rate at the core should be at least ≥ 0.16 ℃/s at 600-800 ℃.

Key words: H11 steel, large module, gas quenching, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TG161

陈浩, 涂宇杰, 蒋志鹏, 吴晓春. H11钢大型压铸模块真空气淬的数值模拟与试验[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 227-235.

Chen Hao, Tu Yujie, Jiang Zhipeng, Wu Xiaochun. Numerical simulation and experiment on vacuum gas quenching of H11 steel large die cast module[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(2): 227-235.

参考文献

[1]Miyamoto J, Abraha P. The effect of plasma nitriding treatment time on the tribological properties of the AISI H13 tool steel[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2019, 375: 15-21.
[2]李勇, 左秀荣, 陈蕴博, 等. 国内外热作模具钢的研究进展[J]. 特殊钢, 2010, 31(3): 20-23.
Li Yong, Zuo Xiurong, Chen Yunbo, et al. Progress of research in hot working die steel at home and abroad[J]. Special Steel, 2010, 31(3): 20-23.
[3]唐克岩, 宋黎. 压铸模及其CAD技术的现状与发展趋势[J]. 机械工程师, 2010, 226(4): 67-69.
Tang Keyan, Song Li. The status and development trend about die-casting mold and the CAD technology[J]. Mechanical Engineer, 2010, 226(4): 67-69.
[4]Yeh S H, Chiu L H, Pan Y T, et al. Relative dimensional change evaluation of vacuum heat-treated JIS SKD61 hot-work tool steels[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2014, 23(6): 2075-2082.
[5]郑铭达. H11钢相变特性、热处理工艺及组织性能研究[D]. 上海: 上海大学, 2020.
Zheng Mingda. Study on phase transformation characteristics, heat treatment, microstructure and properties of H11 steel[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai University, 2020.
[6]左鹏鹏, 黎军顽, 蒋波, 等. 压铸模具钢大模块固溶冷却过程的多物理场耦合数值研究[J]. 材料导报, 2017, 31(S2): 458-464.
Zuo Pengpeng, Li Junwan, Jiang Bo, et al. Multi-physics coupling numerical study on cooling after solution heat treatment for a large die casting steel bloom[J]. Materials Review, 2017, 31(S2): 458-464.
[7]宿德军, 陈军. 热处理过程数值模拟的研究现状和发展趋势[J]. 模具技术, 2004(6): 54-57, 59.
Su Dejun, Chen Jun. Present research status and trend in development of numerical simulation on heat treatment[J]. Die and Mould Technology, 2004(6): 54-57, 59.
[8]Sugimoto T, Taniguchi K, Yamada S, et al. Research for utility of combination calculation method between heat treatment simulation and computer fluid dynamics[J]. Materials Performance and Characterization, 2018, 8(2): 20180023.
[9]张宇航, 吴日铭. H11热作模具钢水淬的有限元模拟和验证[J]. 热处理, 2021, 36(2): 21-25, 30.
Zhang Yuhang, Wu Riming. Finite element simulation and verification of water-quenching for H11 hot work die steel[J]. Heat Treatment, 2021, 36(2): 21-25, 30.
[10]蒋波, 左鹏鹏, 黎军顽, 等. 大截面DIEVAR钢模块固溶冷却行为的数值研究[J]. 上海金属, 2018, 40(2): 38-43.
Jiang Bo, Zuo Pengpeng, Li Junwan, et al. Numerical study on solid solution cooling behavior of DIEVAR steel block with large section[J]. Shanghai Metals, 2018, 40(2): 38-43.
[11]Wang J, Gu J, Shan X, et al. Numerical simulation of high pressure gas quenching of H13 steel[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, 202(1-3): 188-194.
[12]王伟, 张文, 赵建森, 等. 42CrMo钢输出法兰感应淬火的数值模拟及验证[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(2): 242-246.
Wang Wei, Zhang Wen, Zhao Jiansen, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental verification of induction quenching for output flange of 42CrMo steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2023, 48(2): 242-246.
[13]朱宗元. 我国热作模具钢性能数据集[J]. 机械工程材料, 2001, 26(1): 38-42.
Zhu Zongyuan. Property data collection of common hot working die steels used in China[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2001, 26(1): 38-42.
[14]孙剑亭. 轴类锻件热处理工艺模拟及试验研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2008.
Sun Jiantin. Axis class forging heat treatment craft simulation and experimental study[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2008.
[15]Şimşir C, Gür C H. 3D FEM simulation of steel quenching and investigation of the effect of asymmetric geometry on residual stress distribution[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, 207(1-3): 211-221.
[16]苏兴武, 顾敏. 淬火冷却过程数值模拟的研究现状及展望[J]. 金属热处理, 2008, 33(6): 1-7.
Su Xingwu, Gu Min. Research status and prospects of the numerical simulation of quenching process[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2008, 33(6): 1-7.

H11钢大型压铸模块真空气淬的数值模拟与试验

Numerical simulation and experiment on vacuum gas quenching of H11 steel large die cast module

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱禹, 陈菊芳, 陈蒙恩, 李小平, 彭天豪. 不同层间冷却时间下H13钢电弧增材制造热力场数值模拟及强化效果[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 236-243.
[2]	李云峰, 王嘉圣, 石岩, 姜广君, 唐术锋, 何晓东. 载气流量对激光熔覆添加Y₂O₃的镍基涂层组织和耐腐蚀性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 281-290.
[3]	唐鹏, 陆声城, 肖沛欣, 黎家栋, 何万尧. 淬火介质对7075铝合金残余应力影响的数值模拟及试验验证[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 284-290.
[4]	马正和, 阿达依·谢尔亚孜旦, 刘俊杰, 古丽·尼尕尔. 45钢的激光淬火温度场与相变硬化区[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 258-264.
[5]	吕虎跃, 陈旭阳, 丛培武, 陆文林, 杜春辉. 汽车齿轮高压气淬试验及气淬室的结构优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(6): 264-269.
[6]	魏文婷, 赵天翼, 柯锦哲, 刘青龙. 汽车轮毂轴承内圈感应回火温度均匀性的数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(5): 129-137.
[7]	陈建文, 袁伍丰, 邹伟, 刘克, 欧阳雪枚, 王鑫铭. 20Cr2Ni4A钢齿圈压力淬火过程的温度场模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(5): 145-150.
[8]	蒋志鹏, 陈浩, 吴晓春. 压铸模具钢大模块真空高压气淬冷却过程的数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(4): 211-220.
[9]	张斌, 尹少武, 张文聪, 卢世杰, 童莉葛, 王立. 富氧燃烧条件下钢坯加热特性的数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(4): 221-228.
[10]	陈素明, 杨平, 任树锋, 罗贤, 王文博. 30CrMnSiNi2A钢轴类零件感应热处理的数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(4): 235-244.
[11]	王中琳, 李权, 龚志华, 包汉生, 雍兮. 丝杠用1Cr15Ni4Mo2CuN不锈钢热处理温度场的有限元数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(4): 245-252.
[12]	王冰涛, 熊宗慧, 孙耀宁. 不锈钢表面激光熔覆镍基合金涂层的数值模拟与试验[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(1): 232-237.
[13]	王志敏, 黄春玲, 曹宇鹏. 激光冲击波传播特性对E690钢表面微凹坑动态塑性变形的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 253-258.
[14]	熊梨, 张登春, 宋石初, 陈霖. 碳化硅真空烧结炉温度场数值模拟与系统优化[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 259-265.
[15]	郭硕, 樊振宇, 王会珍, 周乐育, 翟月雯. H13钢相变规律及其模具的真空热处理数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(5): 71-75.