喷丸强化与固溶强化复合处理对2024铝合金耐蚀性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.06.011

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 69-76.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.06.011

喷丸强化与固溶强化复合处理对2024铝合金耐蚀性能的影响

乔景振¹, 张笑闻¹, 张环月², 付雪松¹, 周文龙¹, 陈国清¹

1.大连理工大学材料科学与工程学院辽宁省凝固控制与数字化制备技术重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116024;
2.大连理工大学分析测试中心, 辽宁大连 116024

收稿日期:2023-12-01 修回日期:2024-04-13 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-29
通讯作者: 付雪松,副教授,博士,E-mail:xsfu@dlut.edu.cn
作者简介:乔景振(1992—),男,博士,主要研究方向为铝合金腐蚀,E-mail:2550854288@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划政府间合作专项(2021YFE0115400);航空科学基金(201936025001)

Effects of shot peen strengthening and solution strengthening combined treatment on corrosion resistance of 2024 aluminum alloy

Qiao Jingzhen¹, Zhang Xiaowen¹, Zhang Huanyue², Fu Xuesong¹, Zhou Wenlong¹, Chen Guoqing¹

1. Liaoning Key Laboratory of Solidification Control and Digital Fabrication Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian Liaoning 116024, China;
2. Instrumental Analysis Center, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian Liaoning 116024, China

Received:2023-12-01 Revised:2024-04-13 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了喷丸强化、固溶强化、喷丸强化+固溶强化3种工艺对初始时效态2024铝合金耐盐雾腐蚀性能的影响。结果表明,原始试样组织内存在大量第二相颗粒,颗粒尺寸最长约为83 μm。经固溶处理后,部分第二颗粒溶解于基体,剩余颗粒尺寸减小至17 μm。采用喷丸强化和固溶强化复合处理后,材料近表面组织的第二相颗粒几乎全部溶解。当盐雾腐蚀时间为3 h时,原始试样的腐蚀坑直径约为ø90 μm,喷丸+固溶强化试样的腐蚀坑直径约为ø50 μm;喷丸试样的腐蚀深度约为38.75 μm,而喷丸+固溶强化试样的腐蚀深度降低至12.5 μm。这表明喷丸强化和固溶强化复合处理有助于第二相颗粒的溶解,改善材料组织和成分的均匀性,进而提升铝合金的耐蚀性能。

关键词: 盐雾腐蚀, 第二相颗粒, 固溶处理, 晶间腐蚀, 点蚀坑

Abstract: Effects of shot peening strengthening, solution strengthening and shot peening strengthening+solution strengthening on the salt spray corrosion resistance of as-aged 2024 aluminum alloy were studied. The results show that there are numerous secondary phase particles in the primitive specimen microstructure, with the longest particle size of about 83 μm. After solution treatment, some of the secondary phase particles dissolve in the matrix, and the remained particle size is reduced to 17 μm. After the combined treatment of shot peening and solution treatment strengthening, almost all of the secondary phase particles near the surface are dissolved. When the salt spray corrosion test time is 3 h, the diameter of the corrosion pit of the primitive specimen is approximately ø90 μm, the corrosion pit diameter of the shot peening and solution strengthened specimen is about ø50 μm, the corrosion depth of the shot peening specimen is about 38.75 μm, while the corrosion depth of the shot peening and solution strengthened specimen decreases to 12.5 μm. This indicates that the combined treatment of shot peening and solution treatment strengthening contributes to dissolve the second phase particles, improves the uniformity of material structure and composition, and thereby enhances the corrosion resistance of aluminum alloys.

Key words: salt spray corrosion, secondary phase particles, solution treatment, intergranular corrosion, corrosion pits

中图分类号:

TG156.9

乔景振, 张笑闻, 张环月, 付雪松, 周文龙, 陈国清. 喷丸强化与固溶强化复合处理对2024铝合金耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(6): 69-76.

Qiao Jingzhen, Zhang Xiaowen, Zhang Huanyue, Fu Xuesong, Zhou Wenlong, Chen Guoqing. Effects of shot peen strengthening and solution strengthening combined treatment on corrosion resistance of 2024 aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(6): 69-76.

参考文献

[1]张彦民. 2024高强铝合金热处理工艺研究[J]. 热加工工艺, 2020, 49(24): 122-124.
Zhang Yanmin. Study on heat treatment process of 2024 high strength aluminum alloy[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2020, 49(24): 122-124.
[2]Song Y F, Ding X F, Xiao L R, et al. Effects of two-stage aging on the dimensional stability of Al-Cu-Mg alloy[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017(701): 508-514.
[3]Nikoloas D A, Aggeliki P, Theano E, et al. Effect of artificial aging on the mechanical performance of (Al-Cu) 2024 and (Al-Cu-Li) 2198 aluminum alloys[J]. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2016(2): 3782-3783.
[4]张航, 何克准, 黄淑萍, 等. 固溶前退火对2024铝合金薄板组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(6): 169-171.
Zhang Hang, He Kezhun, Huang Shuping, et al. Effect of annealing before solution treatment on microstructure and properties of 2024 aluminum alloy sheet[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(6): 169-171.
[5]姬浩, 段小维, 郑皓. 喷丸对2024铝合金厚板DFR疲劳性能的影响[J]. 热加工工艺, 2018, 47(24): 138-141.
Ji Hao, Duan Xiaowei, Zheng Hao. Effects of shot peening on DFR fatigue properties of 2024 aluminum alloy thick plate[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2018, 47(24): 138-141.
[6]陈亚莉. 铝合金在航空领域中的应用[J]. 有色金属加工, 2003, 32(2): 11-14, 17.
Chen Yali. Application of aluminum alloys to aircraft[J]. Nonferrous Metals Processing, 2003, 32(2): 11-14, 17.
[7]杨福宝, 何优锋, 李大全, 等. 表面喷丸处理对 SSM319s 铝合金耐盐雾腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 稀有金属, 2014, 36(6): 941-947.
Yang Fubao, He Youfeng, Li Daquan, et al. Salt spray corrosion resistance of SSM319s aluminum alloy with surface blast treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 2014, 36(6): 941-947.
[8]Sun Q Q, Liu X T, Han Q Y, et al. A comparison of AA2024 and AA7150 subjected to ultrasonic shot peening: Microstructure, surface segregation and corrosion[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2018(337): 552-560.
[9]Lü S L, Cu Y, Zhang W, et al. Influence of shot peening on failure of an aluminum alloy exposed to aggressive aqueous environments[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2013, 22(6): 1735-1743.
[10]Qiao J Z, Fu X S, Gai P T, et al. Corrosion behavior and microstructure of 2024 aluminum alloy sheets by shot peen forming in a salt spray environment[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2023, 32(9): 4124-4137.
[11]Xu D K, Birbilis N, Lashansky D, et al. Effect of solution treatment on the corrosion behaviour of aluminium alloy AA7150: Optimisation for corrosion resistance[J]. Corrosion Science, 2011(53): 217-225.
[12]Kummar N, Goel S, Jayaganthan R, et al. Effect of solution treatment on mechanical and corrosion behaviors of 6082-T6 Al alloy[J]. Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis, 2015(4): 411-422.
[13]王祝堂. 2024型铝合金的热处理[J]. 金属世界, 2009(2): 43-48.
Wang Zhutang. Heat treatment for 2024 aluminum alloy[J]. Metal World, 2009(2): 43-48.
[14]赵天舒, 骆红云. 深冷熨压对2024铝合金表面纳米化的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(S1): 365-368.
Zhao Tianshu, Luo Hongyun. Effect of cryogenic burnishing on the surface nano crystallization of 2024 aluminum alloy[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(S1): 365-368.
[15]张新明, 吴泽政, 刘胜胆, 等. 固溶处理对7A55铝合金局部腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2014(4): 26-33, 39.
Zhang Xinming, Wu Zezheng, Liu Shengdan, et al. Influence of solution heat treatment on localized corrosion of 7A55 aluminum alloy[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2014(4): 26-33, 39.
[16]车杰, 赵登飞, 郭子龙, 等. 表面粗糙度对金属表面腐蚀影响的研究进展[J]. 石油工业技术监督, 2023, 39(3): 32-36.
Che Jie, Zhao Dengfei, Guo Zilong, et al. Research progress on the effect of surface roughness on metal surface corrosion[J]. Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry, 2023, 39(3): 32-36.
[17]Revie R W, Uhlig H H. Uhlig's Corrosion Handbook[M]. Manhattan: John Wiley and Sons, 2011.

喷丸强化与固溶强化复合处理对2024铝合金耐蚀性能的影响

Effects of shot peen strengthening and solution strengthening combined treatment on corrosion resistance of 2024 aluminum alloy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙数理, 侯小虎, 郭文霞, 张静, 王超, 赵学平, 曹宇. 单级固溶温度对喷射沉积2195铝锂合金组织演变的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(6): 62-68.
[2]	赵忠超, 汲庆涛, 曹善鹏, 唐和壮, 李宾良, 牛博雅, 孙有政. 固溶处理对7175铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 186-192.
[3]	邓德伟, 万泓明, 汪红所, 陈文博, 连世伟. 激光熔覆Stellite6+WC复合涂层对不锈钢叶片耐水蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 243-251.
[4]	孙进宝, 王少华, 刘惠, 李国爱, 王海龙, 张景亮, 周志宇. 稳定化退火对新型5×××铝合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(4): 175-182.
[5]	王亚勇, 曹喜娟, 任广笑, 刘永哲, 郑云凯. 热处理对差压铸造ZL201A铝合金壳体内部组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 108-111.
[6]	李海涛, 陈冬梅, 官海婷, 袁武华. Ti62A钛合金固溶过程中初生α相的球化机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 168-173.
[7]	崔毅, 曹文全, 王艳, 崔继红, 马超, 田仲杰, 张雲飞. 固溶温度及冷却方式对00Cr40Ni55Al3Ti合金组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 142-148.
[8]	高雪鹏, 孙有政, 曹善鹏, 牛博雅, 李宾良, 王萍. 热处理工艺对7075铝合金组织及晶间腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 159-165.
[9]	王海瑞, 王锦永, 刘富强, 齐希伦, 高正磊. 超级双相不锈钢S32750轧制开裂原因分析和解决措施[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 291-296.
[10]	张文玉, 刘先兰, 伍杰, 何文鹏, 田子豪, 全阳. 固溶温度对Ti-Ta合金微观结构及阻尼性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 166-171.
[11]	刘文明, 张新明, 程新路, 欧阳凯. 焊后热处理对S30408/Q345R不锈钢复合板耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 172-178.
[12]	汤嘉琪, 薛玉娜, 王灿坤, 申毅, 刘晓龙, 姬蕴卓, 方烨, 王博瑶. AZ80挤压镁合金微弧涂层的耐蚀性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 256-261.
[13]	王建, 宋蕾, 王艺卓, 张全福, 任乃栋, 武维康, 王红霞, 罗小萍. 固溶处理对Mg-1Zn-1Ca合金组织和耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(9): 48-53.
[14]	肖欣睿, 孙涛, 邓国勇, 彭洁, 苏海, 黎汝栋, 周杰, 王和斌. 添加Sc对6013铝合金组织和硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 16-23.
[15]	施峰, 姚伟民, 沈俭, 殷春宏, 曹琦, 洪亚光, 许辉, 丁阳. 固溶处理对长期服役燃机透平叶片组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 99-105.