20CrMnTi钢真空低压渗碳过程数值模拟

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.08.038

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (8): 220-224.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.08.038

20CrMnTi钢真空低压渗碳过程数值模拟

邓小虎¹, 宋汶娟¹, 凡园园², 郭晶玉¹, 王会珍³, 周乐育³, 徐跃明³, 巨东英⁴

1.天津职业技术师范大学机械工程学院, 天津 300222;
2.宁波天安(集团)股份有限公司, 浙江宁波 315700;
3.中国机械总院集团北京机电研究所有限公司, 北京 100083;
4.日本埼玉工业大学, 深谷 369-0293)

收稿日期:2024-03-05 修回日期:2024-06-24 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-09-27
作者简介:邓小虎(1984—),男,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为热处理智能制造系统开发,E-mail:dengxh@tute.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFE0207000);江苏省产学研合作项目(BY2022834)

Numerical simulation of low pressure carburizing process for 20CrMnTi steel

Deng Xiaohu¹, Song Wenjuan¹, Fan Yuanyuan², Guo Jingyu¹, Wang Huizhen³, Zhou Leyu³, Xu Yueming³, Ju Dongying⁴

1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic Normal University, Tianjin 300222, China;
2. Ningbo Tianan (Group) Co., Ltd., Ningbo Zhejiang 315700, China;
3. Beijing Research Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Technology Co., Ltd., CAM, Beijing 100083, China;
4. Saitama Technical University, Japan, Valley 369-0293, Japan

Received:2024-03-05 Revised:2024-06-24 Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-09-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 依据温度、扩散、相变与应力等多重因素相互作用的原理,利用有限元仿真技术,对20CrMnTi钢在真空低压环境下的渗碳过程进行了模拟与分析。模拟过程充分考虑真空低压渗碳过程强渗和扩散交替进行的边界条件特点,分别对强渗和强渗+扩散进行了模拟计算,得到了碳浓度、马氏体体积分数和硬度分布。结果表明,随着扩散时间的延长,试样表面碳浓度降低,渗碳层深度增大。真空低压渗碳后的碳浓度分布模拟结果与试验结果吻合程度较高,说明模拟准确度较高。模拟得到了强渗+扩散工艺下真空低压渗碳后渗层马氏体体积分数和硬度,二者的分布一致。对比强渗+扩散工艺下真空低压渗碳后试样硬度的模拟结果和试验结果,测量值略高于模拟值,这是因为模拟结果为较大区域的计算平均值。

关键词: 真空低压渗碳, 20CrMnTi钢, 数值模拟

Abstract: Based on the principle of multiple factors such as temperature, diffusion, phase transformation and stress, finite element simulation technology was used to simulate and analyze the carburizing process of 20CrMnTi steel under low pressure environment. The simulation process fully considered the boundary condition characteristics of the alternating strong infiltration and diffusion in the low pressure carburizing process, and the strong infiltration and strong infiltration+diffusion were simulated separately, the carbon concentration, martensite volume fraction and hardness distribution were obtained. The results indicate that as the diffusion time increases, the surface carbon concentration of the specimen decreases and the depth of the carburized layer increases. The simulation results of carbon concentration distribution after carburizing are in good agreement with the experimental results, indicating high simulation accuracy. The volume fraction of martensite and hardness of the carburized layer after low pressure carburizing under strong infiltration+diffusion process are simulated, and the distribution of the two is consistent. Comparing the simulation and experimental results of hardness of the specimen after low pressure carburizing under strong infiltration + diffusion process, the measured value is slightly higher than the simulated value, because the simulation result is the calculated average of a larger area.

Key words: low pressure carburizing, 20CrMnTi steel, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TG156.95

邓小虎, 宋汶娟, 凡园园, 郭晶玉, 王会珍, 周乐育, 徐跃明, 巨东英. 20CrMnTi钢真空低压渗碳过程数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 220-224.

Deng Xiaohu, Song Wenjuan, Fan Yuanyuan, Guo Jingyu, Wang Huizhen, Zhou Leyu, Xu Yueming, Ju Dongying. Numerical simulation of low pressure carburizing process for 20CrMnTi steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(8): 220-224.

参考文献

[1]韩妙玲, 王静, 张国峰, 等. 精密齿轮件的真空低压渗碳高压气淬热处理[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(6): 184-186.
Han Miaoling, Wang Jing, Zhang Guofeng, et al. Vacuum low pressure carburizing and high pressure gas quenching heat treatment of precision gear[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(6): 184-186.
[2]赵振东. 低压真空渗碳的应用与展望[J]. 金属加工(热加工), 2012(3): 6-9.
[3]张连进. 真空渗碳技术的进展[J]. 真空, 2003(1): 42-45.
Zhang Lianjin. Development of low pressure carburizing technology[J]. Vacuum, 2003(1): 42-45.
[4]张建国, 丛培武. 真空渗碳技术国内外概况及发展[J]. 金属热处理, 2003, 28(10): 52-55.
[5]刘尚杰. 乙炔低压渗碳工艺研究[J]. 汽车工艺与材料, 2011(9): 32-34.
[6]刘晔东, 曾爱群. 乙炔低压渗碳的工艺及装备[J]. 热处理, 2005(3): 51-55.
Liu Yedong, Zeng Aiqun. Process and equipment of acetylene low pressure carburizing[J]. Heat Treatment, 2005(3): 51-55.
[7]王志新, 施建军, 梅俊歌, 等. 20CrNi2Mo钢真空渗碳工艺及数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2017, 42(11): 117-122.
Wang Zhixin, Shi Jianjun, Mei Junge, et al. Numerical simulation on vacuum carburization of 20CrNi2Mo steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2017, 42(11): 117-122.
[8]Qin M. 汽车工业中的真空渗碳和高压气淬技术[J]. 顾剑锋, 译. 热处理, 2012, 27(5): 52-56.
Qin M. Vacuum carburizing and high pressure gas quenching technology in automotive industry[J]. Gu Jianfeng, Trans. Heat Treatment, 2012, 27(5): 52-56.
[9]吴平. 浅谈低压真空渗碳热处理技术[J]. 中国设备工程, 2020(13): 203-205.
[10]陈旭阳, 丛培武, 范雷, 等. 基于饱和值调整法的真空低压渗碳工艺计算与验证[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(9): 233-236.
Chen Xuyang, Cong Peiwu, Fan Lei, et al. Calculation and verification of vacuum low pressure carburizing process based on saturation adjustment method[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(9): 233-236.
[11]孙振淋, 张茜, 辛玉武, 等. 渗碳方式对18CrNi4A钢齿轮渗层的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2015, 40(12): 128-131.
Sun Zhenlin, Zhang Qian, Xin Yuwu, et al. Effect of carburizing method on carburized layer of 18CrNi4A steel gear[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2015, 40(12): 128-131.
[12]Sueno S T H, Imataka H. Development of application technology for vacuum carburizing[J]. Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Technical Report, 2017, 116(9): 14-19.
[13]Krupanek K, Sawicki J, Buzalski V. Numerical simulation of phase transformation during gas quenching after low pressure carburizing[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 743: 12047.
[14]刘志新, 刘宪冬, 曹风角, 等. 20CrMnMo齿轮渗碳淬火组织场及硬度场的数值模拟[J]. 热加工工艺, 2013, 42(6): 204-207.
Liu Zhixin, Liu Xiandong, Cao Fengjiao, et al. Numerical simulation of structure field and hardness field on carburizing and quenching process of 20CrMnMo gear[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2013, 42(6): 204-207.
[15]任伟, 张天德, 吴国华, 等. 20CrMnTi钢真空低压渗碳工艺及组织性能研究[J]. 热加工工艺, 2015, 44(16): 187-190.
Ren Wei, Zhang Tiande, Wu Guohua, et al. Study on microstructure and properties of 20CrMnTi steel after vacuum carburizing[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2015, 44(16): 187-190.
[16]王鑫, 顾敏. 齿轮渗碳淬火工艺过程及其畸变的模拟技术研究发展与展望[J]. 热加工工艺, 2019, 48(8): 9-13.
Wang Xin, Gu Min. Research development and prospects of simulation technique of gear carburizing quenching process and distortion[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2019, 48(8): 9-13.
[17]许瑾. 42CrMo钢热处理过程数值模拟及换热系数的测定[D]. 大连: 大连交通大学, 2013.
[18]陈卫, 刘勇, 王顺兴. 碳的扩散系数和传递系数的一种计算方法[J]. 河南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 24(3): 11-13.
Chen Wei, Liu Yong, Wang Shunxing. A calculating method for carbon diffusivity and transfer coefficient[J]. Journal of Henan University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2003, 24(3): 11-13.

20CrMnTi钢真空低压渗碳过程数值模拟

Numerical simulation of low pressure carburizing process for 20CrMnTi steel

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘守河, 易建业, 谢晖. 基于电磁热耦合的Cr12MoV模具钢感应淬火数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 225-231.
[2]	谢本昌, 刘馨宇, 张乐, 陈彦孜, 岑耀东, 陈林. TC4钛合金焊后热处理的数值模拟及组织分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 242-247.
[3]	张俊花, 周大鹏, 郁永昊, 康学勤. 20CrMnTi钢旋挖钻机方头的失效分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 301-304.
[4]	涂宇杰, 李秉宸, 陈浩, 吴晓春. 压铸模具用H11钢大型模块真空等温淬火过程的数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(7): 1-8.
[5]	刘赣华, 邓诗义, 霍小东. 基于热流固耦合模型的螺旋锥齿轮淬火数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(7): 16-21.
[6]	莫洪生, 崔霞, 朱恩锐, 欧阳德来, 杨超. TB6钛合金热压缩及织构演变模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(7): 29-37.
[7]	刘刚, 任津毅, 杨立新, 马蓼奕, 李长生. 不同形状不锈钢棒材热处理装炉系数数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(6): 254-260.
[8]	张帅坤, 张超勇, 吴剑钊, 唐莉梅. 40Cr钢滚刀织构表面激光淬火的数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 47-54.
[9]	冯兴旺, 张可, 刘久江, 石如星, 苏文博, 刘帅, 李志鹏, 杨滨. 蒸汽发生器用SA508-3钢锻后热处理的数值模拟及其试验验证[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 55-61.
[10]	石红昌, 黄安明, 刘兴, 强斌. 焊后热处理对150 mm厚容器钢板残余应力影响的数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 62-67.
[11]	刘刚, 刘艳梅, 张增光, 康冲, 王新宇, 廖启宇. 管形构件热处理形状系数数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(3): 279-285.
[12]	陈浩, 涂宇杰, 蒋志鹏, 吴晓春. H11钢大型压铸模块真空气淬的数值模拟与试验[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 227-235.
[13]	朱禹, 陈菊芳, 陈蒙恩, 李小平, 彭天豪. 不同层间冷却时间下H13钢电弧增材制造热力场数值模拟及强化效果[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 236-243.
[14]	李云峰, 王嘉圣, 石岩, 姜广君, 唐术锋, 何晓东. 载气流量对激光熔覆添加Y₂O₃的镍基涂层组织和耐腐蚀性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(2): 281-290.
[15]	唐鹏, 陆声城, 肖沛欣, 黎家栋, 何万尧. 淬火介质对7075铝合金残余应力影响的数值模拟及试验验证[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(1): 284-290.