QLT热处理对油套管用钢显微组织与力学性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2025.01.016

金属热处理 ›› 2025, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 103-109.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2025.01.016

QLT热处理对油套管用钢显微组织与力学性能的影响

刘文月^1,2, 李天怡^1,2, 安涛^1,2, 李江文^1,2, 杨博威^1,2, 解德刚^1,3

1.海洋装备用金属材料及其应用国家重点实验室, 辽宁鞍山 114009;
2.鞍钢集团北京研究院有限公司, 北京 102209;
3.鞍钢股份有限公司, 辽宁鞍山 114009

收稿日期:2024-07-22 修回日期:2024-11-06 出版日期:2025-01-25 发布日期:2025-03-12
作者简介:刘文月(1980—),男,正高级工程师,博士,主要研究方向为高强韧中厚板材料开发与工艺,E-mail:liuwenyue@ansteel.com

Effect of QLT heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of oil casing steel

Liu Wenyue^1,2, Li Tianyi^1,2, An Tao^1,2, Li Jiangwen^1,2, Yang Bowei^1,2, Xie Degang^1,3

1. State Key Laboratory of Metal Materials for Marine Equipment and Application, Anshan Liaoning 114009, China;
2. Ansteel Beijing Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China;
3. Angang Steel Group Co., Ltd., Anshan Liaoning 114009, China

Received:2024-07-22 Revised:2024-11-06 Online:2025-01-25 Published:2025-03-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了一种高强油套管用钢在热轧态、860 ℃淬火态以及860 ℃淬火+800 ℃两相区淬火+200、660 ℃回火(QLT)处理后的显微组织和力学性能,并利用EBSD和TEM深入研究了高温和低温QLT处理后的微观组织特征与力学性能的关系。结果表明:热轧态试验钢的微观组织为粒状贝氏体+珠光体+少量多边形铁素体;经860 ℃淬火后,组织为板条马氏体以及少量贝氏体;经低温QLT处理后,组织转变为回火马氏体和铁素体,屈服强度为936 MPa,抗拉强度为1260 MPa,屈强比为0.74,0 ℃冲击吸收能量为40 J,此时试验钢中小角度晶界占34.9%,位错密度为10.2×10¹⁴ m^-2,等效晶粒尺寸为1.43 μm;经高温QLT处理后,组织转变为回火索氏体和铁素体,应力-应变曲线出现屈服平台,屈服强度为833 MPa,抗拉强度为912 MPa,屈强比高达0.91,0 ℃冲击吸收能量提高至93 J,具有最佳的强韧性匹配,此时试验钢中小角度晶界占比降低至30.9%,位错密度减小至9.6×10¹⁴ m^-2,等效晶粒尺寸减小至1.39 μm,这使得试验钢的强度下降,同时塑性有所上升。

关键词: 油套管用钢, QLT工艺, EBSD分析, 强韧性匹配

Abstract: Microstructure and mechanical properties of a high strength oil casing steel under different heat treatment conditions as hot rolling, quenching at 860 ℃, and quenching at 860 ℃+quenching at two phase region of 800 ℃+tempering at 200 ℃ and 660 ℃(QTL), respectively, were analyzed, and the relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties of the steel after low temperature QLT and high temperature QLT treatment was studied by means of EBSD and TEM. The results show that the microstructure of the hot-rolled steel is granular bainite+pearlite+a small amount of polygonal ferrite. After quenching at 860 ℃, the microstructure consists of lath martensite and a small amount of bainite. After low temperature QLT treatment, the microstructure transforms into tempered martensite and ferrite, the yield strength is 936 MPa, the tensile strength is 1260 MPa, the yield ratio is 0.74, and the impact absorbed energy at 0 ℃ is 40 J, meanwhile, the proportion of LAGB is 34.9%, the dislocation tensity of GND is 10.2×10¹⁴ m^-2, and the equivalent grain size is 1.43 μm. After high temperature QLT treatment, the microstructure transforms into tempered sorbite and ferrite, yield plateau appears in the stress-strain curve, the yield strength is 833 MPa, the tensile strength is 912 MPa, the yield ratio is 0.91, the impact absorbed energy at 0 ℃ increases to 93 J, all of which show best strength and toughness matching, however, the proportion of LAGB decreases to 30.9%, the dislocation density of GND decreases to 9.6×10¹⁴ m^-2, the equivalent grain size decreases to 1.39 μm, which makes the strength of the tested steel decrease and the plasticity increase.

Key words: oil casing steel, QLT heat treatment, EBSD analysis, strength and toughness matching

中图分类号:

TG441.8

刘文月, 李天怡, 安涛, 李江文, 杨博威, 解德刚. QLT热处理对油套管用钢显微组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(1): 103-109.

Liu Wenyue, Li Tianyi, An Tao, Li Jiangwen, Yang Bowei, Xie Degang. Effect of QLT heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of oil casing steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2025, 50(1): 103-109.

参考文献

[1]冯耀荣, 李鹤林, 韩礼红, 等. 我国油井管国产化技术进展及展望[J]. 石油科学通报, 2022, 7(2): 229-241.
Feng Yaorong, Li Helin, Han Lihong, et al. Progress and prospects of manufacturing technology for oil country tubular goods in China[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2022, 7(2): 229-241.
[2]董晓明, 张忠铧, 孙文. 深井和页岩气开发用超高强度高韧性套管的研制[J]. 钢管, 2016, 45(4): 27-32.
Dong Xiaoming, Zhang Zhonghua, Sun Wen. R&D of ultra-high strength/toughness casing for deep well and shale gas drilling service[J]. Steel Pipe, 2016, 45(4): 27-32.
[3]张忠铧. 我国油井管产业的发展及思考(上)[J]. 钢管, 2022, 51(5): 1-7.
Zhang Zhonghua. Development of domestic OCTG industry and relevant consideration(Part I)[J]. Steel Pipe, 2022, 51(5): 1-7.
[4]刘战锋, 陈妍, 胡海燕, 等. 国内外高强高韧油井管研究现状[J]. 石油管材与仪器, 2017, 3(6): 5-8.
Liu Zhanfeng, Chen Yan, Hu Haiyan, et al. The domestic and foreign research status of high strength and high toughness of OCTG[J]. Petroleum Tubular Goods and Instruments, 2017, 3(6): 5-8.
[5]董晓明, 张忠铧, 尹卫东, 等. 深井开发用超高强度高韧性套管组织对韧性的影响研究[J]. 上海金属, 2015, 37(5): 1-5.
Dong Xiaoming, Zhang Zhonghua, Yin Weidong, et al. Study on influence of microstructure on the toughness of ultra high strength and toughness casing for deep well service[J]. Shanghai Metals, 2015, 37(5): 1-5.
[6]董珍, 刘洪霞, 李培德, 等. V150钢级钻杆管体用无缝钢管的性能研究[J]. 包钢科技, 2021, 47(4): 54-58.
Dong Zhen, Liu Hongxia, Li Peide, et al. Performance study of seamless steel pipe for V150 grade drill pipe body[J]. Science and Technology of Baotou Steel, 2021, 47(4): 54-58.
[7]李阳华, 李红英, 鲁晓超, 等. 奥氏体化工艺对V150油套管强韧性的影响[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(9): 3625-3633.
Li Yanghua, Li Hongying, Lu Xiaochao, et al. Effect of austenitizing process on strength and toughness of V150 grade oil casing[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2013, 44(9): 3625-3633.
[8]张戟, 周田云, 李飞. C110套管用HS05钢的热处理工艺研究[J]. 钢管, 2023, 52(6): 63-67.
Zhang Ji, Zhou Tianyun, Li Fei. Research on heat treatment process of HS05 steel for C110 casing[J]. Steel Pipe, 2023, 52(6): 63-67.
[9]李阳华, 李红英, 王晓峰, 等. 回火工艺对超深井用V150油套管强韧性的影响[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(6): 2244-2251.
Li Yanghua, Li Hongying, Wang Xiaofeng, et al. Effect of tempering process on strength and toughness of oil casing tube for ultra-deep well[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2013, 44(6): 2244-2251.
[10]吴林, 刘文胜, 张可, 等. Ti微合金淬火钢等温回火过程中组织及硬度变化[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2023, 44(11): 184-191.
Wu Lin, Liu Wensheng, Zhang Ke, et al. Changes in microstructure and hardness of Ti-microalloyed quenched steel during isothermal tempering process[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2023, 44(11): 184-191.
[11]王浩楠, 闫晋文, 李顺强, 等. 回火工艺对40CrNiMo钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2022, 46(3): 367-372.
Wang Haonan, Yan Jinwen, Li Shunqiang, et al. Effect of tempering on microstructure and mechanical properties of 40CrNiMo steel[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2022, 46(3): 367-372.
[12]邓伟, 秦小梅. 临界淬火工艺处理高强结构钢Q690GJ的韧化机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(12): 247-252.
Deng Wei, Qin Xiaomei. Fracture resistance mechanism of high strength structural steel Q690GJ treated by intercritical quenching process[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(12): 247-252.
[13]黄曦, 上官昌平, 王泽民, 等. QLT工艺对新型车轴钢显微组织与性能的影响[J]. 现代交通与冶金材料, 2022, 2(5): 40-45.
Huang Xi, Shangguan Changping, Wang Zemin, et al. Effect of QLT process on microstructure and properties of new axle steel[J]. Modern Transportation and Metallurgical Materials, 2022, 2(5): 40-45.
[14]张蒙, 吴光亮. NM500耐磨钢的QLT热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(10): 157-162.
Zhang Meng, Wu Guangliang. QLT heat treatment process of NM500 wear-resistant steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2023, 48(10): 157-162.
[15]姜锋. 高强塑性马氏体—奥氏体复合钢的强塑化机制研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2023.
Jiang Feng. Researches on strengthening and plasticizing mechanism of martensite-austenite composite steel with high strength and plastic[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2023.

QLT热处理对油套管用钢显微组织与力学性能的影响

Effect of QLT heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of oil casing steel

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋科锦, 杜玥, 付雪松, 康黎, 杜宝宪, 周文龙. 2195铝锂合金半球壳对流换热系数数值计算及淬火模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2025, 50(1): 243-249.
[2]	李林平, 刘艳荣, 杨茂鸿, 杜晋峰, 张峥. 焊后热处理对Sanicro25/G115异种钢接头组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(11): 178-184.
[3]	赖春明, 李琴, 周家林, 吴兴欢, 黄艳. 焊后热处理对热丝TIG焊接10Cr9Mo1VNb锅炉用钢组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(9): 169-175.
[4]	杨哲, 陈水胜. 时效工艺对ADC12铝合金析出相与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(9): 216-220.
[5]	王雷, 伽亮亮. 热处理对体育器械用SLM制备7175铝合金组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(6): 115-119.
[6]	石红昌, 黄安明, 刘兴, 强斌. 焊后热处理对150 mm厚容器钢板残余应力影响的数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(5): 62-67.
[7]	张明鲲, 杨敏, 王宇, 赵祥, 井德强. 热处理对高速列车用7005铝合金焊接接头应力腐蚀敏感性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(8): 166-171.
[8]	张振华, 尹少华, 孙志强, 王传栋, 朱万进. 热处理温度对长期服役T23钢焊缝微观组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(5): 229-235.
[9]	张捷, 钟远, 文作伟, 石伟栋, 郭通, 张小文, 罗良飞. 厚壁P92钢管道焊接接头中频感应热处理的应用实践[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(3): 91-95.
[10]	张侠洲, 陈延清, 赵英建, 董现春. 热处理对极寒服役条件下弯管用X70钢焊接接头组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(10): 173-178.
[11]	焦清洋, 赵栋, 王新宇, 李世键. 回火态AerMet100钢的热物理性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(6): 168-172.
[12]	王玉峰, 赵勇桃, 马洪浩, 任慧平. 热处理对1Cr18Ni9Ti与2Cr13钢板焊接接头耐腐蚀性的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(3): 7-11.
[13]	毕宗岳, 韦奉, 张万鹏, 李洁, 张敏. 热处理对极寒服役条件下弯管用X80钢焊缝组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(10): 79-84.
[14]	张翔, 陈波, 解德杰. 焊后热处理对Al-Zn-Mg-Cu合金MIG焊接接头组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(4): 176-179.
[15]	陈凯敏, 文超, 梁会雷. 轴承座开裂分析及预防措施[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(4): 221-223.