时效工艺对25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al高强耐热钢拉伸和高温压缩性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.02.038

金属热处理 ›› 2020, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 197-201.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.02.038

时效工艺对25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al高强耐热钢拉伸和高温压缩性能的影响

高沙沙¹, 孙育竹²

1. 郑州城市职业学院机电工程系, 河南郑州 452370;
2. 河南工业职业技术学院机械工程学院, 河南南阳 473000

收稿日期:2019-08-26 出版日期:2020-02-25 发布日期:2020-04-03
作者简介:高沙沙(1985—),女,讲师,硕士,主要研究方向:材料加工,E-mail:yayunxieqie@126.com。
基金资助:
2017年河南省高等教育教学改革研究与实践重点项目(2017SJGLX146)

Effect of aging process on tensile and high temperature compressive properties of 25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al high strength heat-resistant steel

Gao Shasha¹, Sun Yuzhu²

1. Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, City University of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou Henan 452370, China;
2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Henan Polytechnic Institute, Nanyang Henan 473000, China

Received:2019-08-26 Online:2020-02-25 Published:2020-04-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过在25Cr-20Ni耐热钢基体成分中加入质量分数为2.5%Al的方式制备25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al耐热钢,分别采用拉伸和高温压缩试验对其力学性能进行表征分析,研究结果表明:经过36 h时效处理的试样抗拉强度得到明显提升,此时抗拉强度和伸长率分别为803 MPa和27.1%。经过36 h时效处理会减小拉伸断口的韧性,生成部分脆性断裂的痕迹。随时效温度的增加,耐热钢的抗拉强度先增大后减小,伸长率先减小后增大,转折点均出现在时效温度650 ℃,此时抗拉强度和伸长率分别为451 MPa和10.26%。当变形程度增大后,晶粒将达到更大的变形程度,而耐热钢经过热压缩处理后并不会引起晶粒尺寸的明显改变;晶界部位存在析出相,而且当变形量增大后析出相的数量也会略微增加。

关键词: 25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al高强耐热钢, 时效处理, 拉伸, 压缩

Abstract:

25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al heat resistant steel was prepared by adding 2.5% Al in 25Cr-20Ni heat-resistant steel and its mechanical properties were characterized and analyzed by means of tensile and high temperature compression experiments, respectively. The results show that the tensile strength of the sample after 36 h aging treatment is significantly improved, and the tensile strength and elongation are 803 MPa and 27.1%, respectively. After 36 h aging treatment, the toughness of the tensile fracture is reduced and the traces of partial brittle fracture are generated. With the aging temperature increasing, the tensile strength of the heat-resistant steel increases first and then decreases, while the elongation decreases first and then increases. The turning point occurs at the aging temperature of 650 ℃, when the tensile strength and elongation are 451 MPa and 10.26%, respectively. When the deformation degree increases, the grain reaches a larger deformation extent, while the grain size of the heat-resistant steel does not change obviously after thermal compression treatment. Precipitation phase also exists at the grain boundary, and the number of precipitation phase increases slightly when the deformation increases.

Key words: 25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al high strength heat-resistant steel, aging treatment, tensile, compression

中图分类号:

TG161

高沙沙, 孙育竹. 时效工艺对25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al高强耐热钢拉伸和高温压缩性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(2): 197-201.

Gao Shasha, Sun Yuzhu. Effect of aging process on tensile and high temperature compressive properties of 25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al high strength heat-resistant steel[J]. HTM, 2020, 45(2): 197-201.

参考文献

[1]王雨丝, 夏家群, 和浩浩, 等. 600 MW超临界火力发电机组锅炉效率分析[J]. 工业加热, 2016, 45(1): 5-8.
Wang Yusi, Xia Jiaqun, He Haohao, et al. Boiler efficiency analysis of 600 MW supercritical thermal power unit[J]. Industrial Heating, 2016, 45 (1): 5-8.
[2]杨勇平, 杨志平, 徐钢, 等. 中国火力发电能耗状况及展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(23): 1-8.
Yang Yongping, Yang Zhiping, Xu Gang, et al. Energy consumption status and prospect of thermal power generation in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2013, 33 (23): 1-8.
[3]宁保群, 刘永长, 殷红旗, 等. 超高临界压发电厂锅炉管用铁素体耐热钢的发展现状与研究前景[J]. 材料导报, 2006, 20(12): 83-86.
Ning Baoqun, Liu Yongchang, Yin Hongqi, et al. Development status and research prospect of ferritic heat-resistant steel for boiler tube of ultra-high critical pressure power plant[J]. Material Guide, 2006, 20 (12): 83-86.
[4]Dudziak T, Lkaszewicz M, Simms N, et al. Steam oxidation of TP347HFG, super 304H and HR3C-analysis of significance of steam flowrate and specimen surface finish[J]. Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, 2014, 50(4): 272-282.
[5]许航, 李玉平, 方旭东, 等. HR3C耐热钢在高温蠕变过程中微观组织演变分析[J]. 热加工工艺, 2017(6): 107-111.
Xu Hang, Li Yuping, Fang Xudong, et al. Microstructure evolution analysis of HR3C heat resistant steel during high temperature creep[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2017(6): 107-111.
[6]李君, 吴少华, 李振中. 超超临界燃煤发电技术是我国目前发展洁净煤发电技术的优先选择[J]. 中国电力, 2004, 37(9): 30-35.
Li Jun, Wu Shaohua, Li Zhenzhong. Ultra supercritical coal-fired power generation technology is the priority for the development of clean coal power generation technology in China[J]. China Electric Power, 2004, 37 (9): 30-35.
[7]王敬忠, 刘正东, 包汉生, 等. 中国超超临界电站锅炉关键材料用钢及合金的研究现状[J]. 钢铁, 2015, 50(8): 1-6.
Wang Jingzhong, Liu Zhengdong, Bao Hansheng, et al. Research status of steel and alloy for key materials of ultra supercritical power station boiler in China[J]. Iron and Steel, 2015, 50 (8): 1-6.
[8]高秋志, 张旦天, 刘家泳, 等. 高Cr铁素体耐热钢连续冷却相变行为[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2011, 32(9): 67-71.
Gao Qiuzhi, Zhang Dantian, Liu Jiayong, et al. Continuous cooling transformation behavior of high Cr ferritic heat-resistant steel[J]. Transactions of Material and Heat Treatment, 2011, 32 (9): 67-71.
[9]聂铭, 于在松, 周荣灿. 2.25Cr-1.6W(T23)铁素体耐热钢服役过程中的组织演变研究[J]. 压力容器, 2011, 28(6): 1-4.
Nie Ming, Yu Zaisong, Zhou Rongcan. Study on the microstructure evolution of 2.25cr-1.6w (T23) ferritic heat-resistant steel in service[J]. Pressure Vessel, 2011, 28 (6): 1-4.
[10]Li H Y, Wei D D, Hu J D, et al. Constitutive modeling for hot deformation behavior of T24 ferritic steel[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2012, 53(1): 425-430.

[11]Fan Z Q, Hao T, Zhao S X, et al. The microstructure and mechanical properties of T91 steel processed by ECAP at room temperature[J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2013, 434(1-3): 417-421.
[12]Chiu Y T, Lin C K, Wu J C. High-temperature tensile and creep properties of a ferritic stainless steel for interconnect in solid oxide fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(4): 2005-2012.
[13]岳增武, 李辛庚. 喷丸处理提高奥氏体耐热钢抗氧化性能的研究及应用[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2013, 34(1): 157-162.
Yue Zengwu, Li Xingeng. Study and application of shot peening to improve the oxidation resistance of austenitic heat-resistant steel[J]. Journal of Material Heat Treatment, 2013, 34 (1): 157-162.
[14]谭威, 季根顺, 张建斌, 等. 节镍奥氏体不锈钢加热过程中γ→δ转变的原位观察[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2011, 32(10): 90-95.
Tan Wei, Ji Genshun, Zhang Jianbin, et al. In situ observation of γ - δ transformation during heating of nickel saving austenitic stainless steel[J]. Journal of Material Heat Treatment, 2011, 32 (10): 90-95.
[15]王斌, 刘正东, 程世长, 等. 固溶处理工艺对HR3C奥氏体耐热钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 机械工程材料, 2014, 38(6): 25-30.
Wang Bin, Liu Zhengdong, Cheng Shichang, et al. Effect of solution treatment process on microstructure and properties of HR3C austenitic heat resistant steel[J]. Mechanical Engineering Materials, 2014, 38 (6): 25-30.

时效工艺对25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al高强耐热钢拉伸和高温压缩性能的影响

Effect of aging process on tensile and high temperature compressive properties of 25Cr-20Ni-2.5Al high strength heat-resistant steel

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王玉岱, 刘洋, 朱言言, 田象军, 程序, 冉先喆, 钱婷婷. 热处理对复合制造AerMet100超高强度钢组织均匀性与拉伸性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 1-9.
[2]	陈东俊, 李广阳, 刘刚. 时效处理对AlSi9Cu3压铸铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 53-56.
[3]	贾昌远, 霍元明, 何涛, 霍存龙, 刘克然. 40CrNiMo钢高温拉伸变形行为和组织演变规律[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 69-74.
[4]	王庆娟, 田云飞, 高贝特, 史佳敏, 吴欢, 蔡军. 工业纯钛TA1的双道次热压缩变形及软化行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 75-79.
[5]	陈思君, 陈送义, 陈庚, 袁丁玲, 陈康华. Mg含量对2A14铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 86-92.
[6]	胡静, 陶科, 杨庆松, 李刚, 张德汉. 机械抛光后的时效工艺对0Cr25Al5电热合金拉拔性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 171-177.
[7]	杨春苗, 王珊, 王淑慧, 李延珍, 刘文文. RRA过程中预时效时间对7A85铝合金组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 44-47.
[8]	王方军, 刘应龙, 时瑶, 万红, 刘斌斌. 等温退火处理对Inconel 625合金箔材组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 77-81.
[9]	叶拓, 何玉兵, 何文鹏, 刘巍, 袁浩登, 吴远志, 刘伟, 刘吉兆. 轧制态6082-T6铝合金的热压缩力学行为及微观组织分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 26-30.
[10]	崔聪, 高飞, 高野, 刘振宇. 21Cr节镍型双相不锈钢高温形变过程的静态软化分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 79-87.
[11]	王英虎, 郑淮北, 白青青, 宋令玺, 胡进, 黄博. Mn18Cr18N高氮奥氏体不锈钢的高温力学性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 172-177.
[12]	谭皎, 张伯岩, 朱文光, 孙巧艳. 时效温度对Ti-5Al-4Zr-10Mo-3Cr钛合金微观组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 217-225.
[13]	朱林, 程向龙, 邹喜洋. 26CrMo4钢的热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 271-275.
[14]	丁轩, 甘玉荣, 蒋爱娟, 李辉, 杨明球. 时效处理对7A55铝合金微观组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 120-123.
[15]	王海波, 徐震霖, 胡学文, 彭欢. 热轧超高强度复相钢的氢脆敏感性[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(8): 51-55.