淬火-配分处理对二次淬火时钢中残留奥氏体分解转变的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.10.003

金属热处理 ›› 2020, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 11-16.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.10.003

淬火-配分处理对二次淬火时钢中残留奥氏体分解转变的影响

历长云^1,2, 张珊珊², 康人木³, 许磊¹, 米国发²

1.中国石油大学北京克拉玛依校区工学院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000;
2.河南理工大学材料科学与工程学院, 河南焦作 454000;
3.德阳市产品质量监督检验所, 四川德阳 618000

收稿日期:2020-07-27 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2020-12-29
通讯作者: 许磊,副教授,博士,E-mail: xulei@cupk.edu.cn
作者简介:历长云(1978—),女,教授,博士,主要研究方向为金属、轻质金属基复合材料,E-mail: lucy1226@126.com。
基金资助:
中国石油大学(北京)克拉玛依校区科研启动项目(XQZX20200019,XQZX20200016)

Effect of quenching-partitioning process on decomposition of retained austenite in steel during secondary quenching

Li Changyun^1,2, Zhang Shanshan², Kang Renmu³, Xu Lei¹, Mi Guofa²

1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay Xinjiang 834000, China;
2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo Henan 454000, China;
3. Deyang Products Quality Supervision & Inspection Institute, Deyang Sichuan 618000, China

Received:2020-07-27 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2020-12-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对0.26C-1.72Si-1.56Mn钢进行了不同碳配分时间的淬火-配分(Q-P)处理,并研究了其组织,特别是二次淬火中奥氏体的分解转变。结果表明:Q-P处理后都形成了板条马氏体+二次淬火组织,且二次淬火组织中都存在孪晶马氏体;碳配分时间在10~300 s范围内,Q-P处理后残留奥氏体中的C含量均高于1.0wt%,残留奥氏体的含量不低于11%(体积分数),有利于钢韧性的改善;初次淬火后未转变奥氏体的形态和尺寸是影响其稳定性的关键因素,初次马氏体板条界膜状奥氏体容易形成残留奥氏体;相对于块状未转变奥氏体,条状未转变奥氏体容易形成二次淬火马氏体及片状残留奥氏体。

关键词: 淬火-配分, 二次淬火, 残留奥氏体, 二次马氏体, 孪晶马氏体

Abstract: 0.26C-1.72Si-1.56Mn steel was treated by quenching-partitioning (Q-P) with different carbon partitioning time, and the Q-P microstructure, especially the decomposition of austenite during the secondary quenching stage of the Q-P process, was investigated. The results show that the mix microstructure of lath martensite and secondary quenching microstructure is formed after Q-P treatment, with existence of twin martensite in the secondary quenching microstructure. After Q-P treatment, the C content in retained austenite is higher than 1.0 wt% and the content of retained austenite is not less than 11%(volume fraction) with the partitioning time in the range of 10-300 s, which is beneficial to the improvement of toughness. The morphologies and size of the untransformed austenite after primary quenching are the key factors affecting its stability. The film austenite between primary martensite laths is easy to become retained austenite. Compared with the block untransformed austenite, the strip-shaped untransformed austenite is easy to form secondary quenching martensite and lamellar retained austenite.

Key words: quenching-partitioning, secondary quenching, retained austenite, secondary martensite, twin martensite

中图分类号:

TG156.1

历长云, 张珊珊, 康人木, 许磊, 米国发. 淬火-配分处理对二次淬火时钢中残留奥氏体分解转变的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(10): 11-16.

Li Changyun, Zhang Shanshan, Kang Renmu, Xu Lei, Mi Guofa. Effect of quenching-partitioning process on decomposition of retained austenite in steel during secondary quenching[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(10): 11-16.

参考文献

[1]Speer J, Matlock D K, Cooman B C D, et al. Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation[J]. Acta Materialia, 2003, 51(9): 2611-2622.
[2]Zhang K, Zhu M, Lan B, et al. The mechanism of high-strength quenching-partitioning-tempering martensitic steel at elevated temperatures[J]. Crystals, 2019, 9(2): 94-103.
[3]Peng F, Xu Y, Han D T, et al. Influence of pre-tempering treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties in quenching and partitioning steels with ferrite-martensite start structure[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 756: 248-257.
[4]Wang C Y, Li X D, Chang Y, et al. Comparison of three-body impact abrasive wear behaviors for quenching-partitioning-tempering and quenching-tempering 20Si2Ni3 steels[J]. Wear, 2016, 362-363: 121-128.
[5]Qin S W, Liu Y, Hao Q G, et al. High carbon microalloyed martensitic steel with ultrahigh strength-ductility[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2016, 663: 151-156.
[6]Qin S W, Liu Y, Hao Q G, et al. The mechanism of high ductility for novel high-carbon quenching-partitioning-tempering martensitic steel[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2015, 46(9): 4047-4055.
[7]Zhang K, Liu P, Li W, et al. Ultrahigh strength-ductility steel treated by a novel quenching-partitioning-tempering process[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2014, 619: 205-211.
[8]Li Y J, Liu D, Zhang W N, et al. Quenching above martensite start temperature in quenching and partitioning(Q&P) steel through control of partial phase transformation[J]. Materials Letter, 2018, 230: 36-39.
[9]李娜, 刘国权, 康人木, 等. 一种新型Q-P-T钢的工艺与组织性能[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2013, 34(3): 118-124.
Li Na, Liu Guoquan, Kang Renmu, et al. Processing design and microstructure and mechanical properties of a new type of Q-P-T steel[J]. Transaction of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2013, 34(3): 118-124.
[10]王颖, 张珂, 郭正洪, 等. 残留奥氏体增强低碳Q-P-T钢塑性的新效应[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(6): 641-648.
Wang Ying, Zhang Ke, Guo Zhenghong, et al. A new effect of retained austenite on ductility enhancement of low carbon Q-P-T steel[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2012, 48(6): 641-648.
[11]Peng F, Xu Y B, Gu X L, et al. The relationships of microstructure-mechanical properties in quenching and partitioning(Q&P) steel accompanied with microalloyed carbide precipitation[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2018, 723: 247-258.
[12]郭浩冉, 高古辉, 桂晓露, 等. 配分温度对Q-P-T 钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2017, 38(9): 89-95.
Guo Haoran, Gao Guhui, Gui Xiaolu, et al. Effect of partitioning temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of Q-P-T steel[J]. Transaction of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2017, 38(9): 89-95.
[13]Kang T, Zhao Z Z, Liang J H, et al. Effect of the austenitizing temperature on the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of Q&P steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2020, 771: 138584.
[14]郭艳辉, 付斌, 邓想涛. 低碳硅锰钢的Q＆P 热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(7): 24-27.
Guo Yanhui, Fu Bin, Deng Xiangtao. Q＆P heat treatment process for low carbon Si-Mn steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(7): 24-27.
[15]Li Y, Chen S, Wang C, et al. Modeling retained austenite in Q&P steels accounting for the bainitic transformation and correction of its mismatch on optimal conditions[J]. Acta Materialia, 2020, 188: 528-538.
[16]Seo E J, Cho L, Estrin Y, et al. Microstructure-mechanical properties relationships for quenching and partitioning(Q&P) processed steel[J]. Acta Materialia, 2016, 113: 124-139.
[17]Seo E J, Cho L, Kim J K, et al. Constituent-specific properties in quenching and partitioning(Q&P) processed steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 740-741: 439-444.
[18]Lu J, Yu H, Kang P F, et al. Study of microstructure, mechanical properties and impact-abrasive wear behavior of medium-carbon steel treated by quenching and partitioning(Q&P) process[J]. Wear, 2018, 414-415: 21-30.
[19]Gao G H, Gao B, Gui X L, et al. Correlation between microstructure and yield strength of as-quenched and Q&P steels with different carbon content (0.06-0.42wt%C)[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 753: 1-10.
[20]Parthiban R, Chowdhury S G, Harikumar K C, et al. Evolution of microstructure and its influence on tensile properties in thermo-mechanically controlled processed (TMCP) quench and partition (Q&P) steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2017, 705: 376-384.
[21]Allain S Y P, Gaudez S, Geandier G, et al. Carbon heterogeneities in austenite during quenching & partitioning (Q&P) process revealed by in situ high energy X-ray diffraction (HEXRD) experiments[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2020, 181: 108-114.
[22]Sugimoto K I, Tsunezawa M, Hojo T, et al. Ductility of 0.1-0.6C-1.5Si-1.5Mn ultra high-strength TRIP-aided sheet steels with bainitic ferrite matrix[J]. ISIJ International, 2004, 44(9): 1608-1614.
[23]Behera A K, Olson G B. Nonequilibrium thermodynamic modeling of carbon partitioning in quench and partition (Q&P) steel[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2018, 147: 6-10.

淬火-配分处理对二次淬火时钢中残留奥氏体分解转变的影响

Effect of quenching-partitioning process on decomposition of retained austenite in steel during secondary quenching

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	祁晓亮, 李岩, 定巍, 赵增武. 含Al中锰TRIP钢原始组织对临界退火后组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 24-29.
[2]	陈连生, 房宁, 曹仲乾, 杨子旋, 李红斌, 潘红波, 田亚强. 压下率对两相区温轧淬火配分中锰钢组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 28-33.
[3]	刘韬, 吴红艳, 高秀华, 秦岽烊, 杜林秀. 临界区回火温度对Fe-4Mn-1.2Cr-0.3Cu-0.6Ni中锰钢微观组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 91-98.
[4]	董瑞, 陈林, 岑耀东, 包喜荣. 不同热处理条件下贝氏体钢的微观组织和疲劳裂纹扩展[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 153-158.
[5]	侯雅青, 张宇, 于明光, 王静静, 杨丽, 苏航. Q&P钢残留奥氏体含量的热动力学计算[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 25-31.
[6]	高亚平, 师仲然, 贾涓, 罗小兵, 宋新莉. 热处理工艺对疏浚工程用船体钢组织及磨粒磨损性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 32-37.
[7]	邱旭扬帆, 杨卓越, 丁雅莉. 提高Cr-Ni-Mo-Ti马氏体时效不锈钢超低温韧性的固溶处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 44-48.
[8]	邓彪, 陈蓬, 王国栋. 回火温度对二次硬化马氏体不锈钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 65-71.
[9]	赵少甫, 许鸿翔, 王红伟, 郭敬强, 李子岩, 陈岩. 提高20Cr2Ni4A钢齿轮渗碳淬火硬度的试验研究[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(7): 120-125.
[10]	王玲奇, 何燕霖, 潘乐. 回火温度对高氮不锈轴承钢显微组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(6): 8-13.
[11]	李雄, 林发驹, 杜思敏, 吴铖川. 高性能轴承钢的比较分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(6): 14-20.
[12]	安敏, 付中元, 袁超, 夏云志. 淬火后清洗和冷处理工艺对9Cr18钢轴承套圈残留奥氏体含量的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(6): 21-23.
[13]	邱旭扬帆, 杨卓越, 丁雅莉. 残留/逆转变奥氏体对改善高强度不锈钢-196 ℃超低温冲击性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(5): 71-74.
[14]	梁静宇, 石增敏, 谢镐, 邓李辰贵, 李光宇, 戴雷. 汽车用超高强度钢的合金化方式及组织控制[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(4): 20-25.
[15]	李彦龙, 吴琼, 刘常升. 回火温度对Cr5NiMoVNb支承辊用钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(2): 136-139.