7075铝合金汽车支撑摆臂锻件固溶处理温度场模拟

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.10.041

金属热处理 ›› 2020, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 212-217.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.10.041

7075铝合金汽车支撑摆臂锻件固溶处理温度场模拟

杨红斌, 卜恒勇, 李萌蘖

昆明理工大学材料科学与工程学院, 云南昆明 650093

收稿日期:2020-03-18 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2020-12-29
通讯作者: 卜恒勇,副教授,硕士生导师,E-mail:buhengyong@163.com
作者简介:杨红斌(1989—),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为铝合金材料成分设计及热处理数值模拟研究,E-mail:yanghgbin@126.com。
基金资助:
云南省稀贵金属材料基因工程(一期)(2018ZE014)

Temperature field simulation for solid solution treatment of 7075 aluminum alloy support swing arm forging for automobile

Yang Hongbin, Bu Hengyong, Li Mengnie

Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming Yunnan 650093, China

Received:2020-03-18 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2020-12-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用ABAQUS有限元软件对7075铝合金汽车支撑摆臂锻件固溶处理过程温度场进行数值模拟,得到了锻件在不同升温方式、不同转运时间以及不同水温淬火下的温度场分布情况。结果表明,锻件随炉升温时,达到预定温度所需时间为112.1 min,最大温差为4.8 ℃;炉子到温后放入锻件升温时仅需71.2 min,最大温差为10.4 ℃。转运时间为3、3.5和4 min时,锻件中冷却最快部位的温度分别下降到384.0、375.9和367.8 ℃,最终确定转运时间不能超过3.5 min。采用25 ℃水淬时,冷却时间为95 s,冷却最快和最慢部位通过淬火温度敏感区的平均冷却速度分别为782.8和19.1 ℃/s,最大温差为237.6 ℃;80 ℃水淬时,冷却时间为56 s,锻件中冷却最快和最慢部分通过淬火温度敏感区的平均冷却速度则分别为587.4和16.8 ℃/s,最大温差为216.0 ℃。

关键词: 7075铝合金, 固溶处理, 数值模拟, 温度场

Abstract: Temperature field of 7075 aluminum alloy automobile support swing arm forging in solid solution treatment process was simulated by ABAQUS finite element software, and the temperature field distributions of the forging under different heating ways, transfer time and quenching water temperatures were obtained. The results show that when heating up along with the furnace, the time required for the forging to reach the preset temperature is 112.1 min and the maximum temperature difference is 4.8 ℃; when the forging is loaded after the furnace reaches the preset temperature, the required time and the maximum temperature difference are 71.2 min and 10.4 ℃, respectively. When the transfer time is 3, 3.5 and 4 min, the temperature of the fastest cooling part in the forging decreases to 384.0, 375.9 and 367.8 ℃ respectively, so the transfer time is finally selected as less than 3.5 min. When quenched in 25 ℃ water, the cooling time is 95 s, the average cooling rate of the fastest and the slowest parts of the forging passing through the quench temperature sensitive zone is 782.8 and 19.1 ℃/s respectively, and the maximum temperature difference is 237.6 ℃. When quenched in 80 ℃ water, the cooling time is 56 s, and the average cooling rate of the fastest and slowest parts of the forging passing through the quenching temperature sensitive zone is 587.4 and 16.8 ℃/s respectively, and the maximum temperature difference is 216.0 ℃.

Key words: 7075 aluminum alloy, solution treatment, numerical simulation, temperature field

中图分类号:

TG156.1

杨红斌, 卜恒勇, 李萌蘖. 7075铝合金汽车支撑摆臂锻件固溶处理温度场模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(10): 212-217.

Yang Hongbin, Bu Hengyong, Li Mengnie. Temperature field simulation for solid solution treatment of 7075 aluminum alloy support swing arm forging for automobile[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(10): 212-217.

参考文献

[1]刘兵, 彭超群, 王日初, 等. 大飞机用铝合金的研究现状及展望[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2010, 20(9): 1705-1715.
Liu Bing, Peng Chaoqun, Wang Richu, et al. Recent development and prospects for giant plant aluminum alloys[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2010, 20(9): 1705-1715.
[2]Zhang Xuesong, Chen Yongjun, Hu Junling. Recent advances in the development of aerospace materials[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2018, 97: 22-34.
[3]Shin Jesik, Kim Taehyeong, Kim Dongeung, et al. Castability and mechanical properties of new 7xxx aluminum alloys for automotive chassis/body applications[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 698: 577-590.
[4]Peng Guosheng, Chen Kanhua, Chen Songyi, et al. Evolution of the second phase particles during the heating-up process of solution treatment of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2015, 641: 237-241.
[5]Zou Xiuliang, Yan Hong, Chen Xiaohui. Evolution of second phases and mechanical properties of 7075 Al alloy processed by solution heat treatment[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2017, 27(10): 2146-2155.
[6]韩成府, 岑少起, 路王珂, 等. 固溶处理对7075铝合金组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 特种铸造及有色合金, 2017, 37(2): 201-204.
Han Chengfu, Cen Shaoqi, Lu Wangke, et al. Influences of solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of 7075 aluminum alloy[J]. Special Casting and Nonferrous Alloys, 2017, 37(2): 201-204.
[7]Fan Shitong, Deng Yunlai, Zhang Jin, et al. Calculation and experimental study on heating temperature field of super-high strength aluminum alloy thick plate[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2017, 27(11): 2415-2422.
[8]张铁桥, 丁恒敏, 浦吕春. 7050铝合金零件淬火过程中温度场及热应力场的模拟研究[J]. 热加工工艺, 2013, 42(6): 149-152.
Zhang Tieqiao, Ding Hengmin, Pu Lüchun. Simulation research on temperature field and thermal stress field of 7050 aluminum alloy part in quenching preocess[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2013, 42(6): 149-152.
[9]吴垠, 江雄心. 7075铝合金锻件淬火热处理有限元模拟[J]. 热加工工艺, 2012, 41(12): 177-180.
Wu Yin, Jiang Xiongxin. Finite element simulation of quenching process for 7075 Al alloy[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2012, 41(12): 177-180.
[10]刘庄, 吴景之, 张毅, 等. 热处理过程的数值模拟[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996.
[11]雷文光, 毛小南, 卢亚锋, 等. TC21钛合金锻件淬火过程温度场及热应力场数值模拟[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2011, 40(10): 1721-1726.
Lei Wenguang, Mao Xiaonan, Lu Yafeng, et al. Numerical simulation of temperature field and thermal stress field in quenching process of TC21 titanium alloy forging[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2011, 40(10): 1721-1726.
[12]姚灿阳. 7050铝合金厚板淬火温度场及内应力场的数值模拟研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2007.
[13]刘坚, 毛大恒, 湛利华. 2124铝合金超厚板热轧过程温度场的数值模拟[J]. 机械工程材料, 2009, 33(1): 86-89.
Liu Jian, Mao Daheng, Zhan Lihua. Numerical simulation of temperature field in hot rolling process of extra-thick plates of 2124 aluminum alloy[J]. Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 33(1): 86-89.
[14]王金亮, 刘嘉辰, 陈慧琴. Al-Zn-Mg-Cu系高强铝合金厚板淬火过程数值模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2014, 39(3): 130-133.
Wang Jinliang, Liu Jiachen, Chen Huiqin. Numerical simulation of quenching process of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu high strength aluminum alloy thick plate[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2014, 39(3): 130-133.
[15]Muammer Koc, John Culp, Taylan Altan. Prediction of residual stresses in quenched aluminum blocks and their reduction through cold working processes[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2006, 174: 342-354.

7075铝合金汽车支撑摆臂锻件固溶处理温度场模拟

Temperature field simulation for solid solution treatment of 7075 aluminum alloy support swing arm forging for automobile

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王英虎, 郑淮北, 刘庭耀, 宋令玺, 白青青. 固溶处理对53Cr21Mn9Ni4N耐热钢组织及碳化物的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 39-45.
[2]	王瑞琴, 葛鹏, 廖强, 侯鹏, 刘宇. 固溶冷却方式对短时用高温钛合金板材组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 196-198.
[3]	赵欣, 陈正宗, 赵海平. 马氏体耐热钢大型管坯加热工艺模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 208-212.
[4]	杨杰, 汪西, 周杰, 武建祥, 屈志远, 代合平, 彭海军. 转向节锻件枝丫结构淬火裂纹形成机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 263-267.
[5]	孙建, 黄贞益, 李景辉, 王萍. 固溶和时效处理对Fe-Mn-Al-C轻质钢组织和硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 34-38.
[6]	程体娟, 甘斌, 于鸿垚, 周海晶, 郭彩玉, 毕中南, 杜金辉. 固溶处理对新型镍基高温合金组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 107-112.
[7]	叶拓, 唐明, 刘吉兆, 刘伟, 吴远志, 刘巍, 徐文. 固溶温度对7075铝合金板材组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(3): 119-123.
[8]	禹鑫磊, 郑小平, 曹通, 田亚强, 陈连生. 等温温度对轧制SIMA法制备7075合金半固态显微组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 164-167.
[9]	蔡显杰, 吴博雅, 左鹏鹏, 黎军顽, 郭伟. 压铸模镶块的热疲劳失效行为[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(2): 250-256.
[10]	邱旭扬帆, 杨卓越, 丁雅莉. 提高Cr-Ni-Mo-Ti马氏体时效不锈钢超低温韧性的固溶处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 44-48.
[11]	强菲, 王文, 张婷, 杨娟, 蔡军, 王快社. Al-Zn-Mg-Cu铝合金厚板搅拌摩擦焊接头搅拌区微观组织[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 135-141.
[12]	巩芳源, 冯翰秋, 郎宇平, 陈海涛, 王曼, 朱雄明, 冷崇燕. 氮及热处理制度对028合金微观组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 36-41.
[13]	师亚洲, 逯广平, 高翌, 廖承志, 杨屹. 脉冲磁场处理对7075铝合金性能及组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 159-163.
[14]	叶小飞, 张文, 米艳军, 朱百智, 张玉锁, 易亮, 黄振建. 风电内齿圈感应淬火的数值模拟及验证[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 273-278.
[15]	于春鹏, 王立强, 汤贞涛, 陈丽丽. 铝合金大型锻件淬火过程的有限元模拟[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(9): 279-283.