夹杂物对15MnB钢冲击性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2020.11.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 15MnB钢的化学成分和生产工艺决定了材料中极易出现MnS和TiN这两种夹杂物,研究了15MnB钢中S、Ti两种元素对夹杂物的产生及冲击性能的影响。设计不同S元素、Ti元素含量的15MnB钢,采用相同锻造、轧制及热处理工艺处理后,检测其冲击性能。采用光学显微镜观察试样的显微组织和夹杂物形貌,并用扫描电镜及能谱仪对夹杂物的化学成分进行检测。结果表明:S元素含量≤0.0029%,Ti元素含量≤0.03%时,15MnB钢的冲击性能最优;S元素含量≤0.0029%时,材料中形成的夹杂物数量少且尺寸小,15MnB钢的冲击性能稳定性随其含量减少而增强;Ti元素含量≥0.06%时,材料中会形成大量尺寸较大的TiN导致15MnB钢冲击性能大幅度降低。为了获得良好且稳定的冲击性能,建议企业在生产15MnB钢时严格控制夹杂物种类和等级,具体要求:D类(细系)≤1.0级、TiN≤0.5级,不应存在其他类型的夹杂物。

关键词: 15MnB钢, 夹杂物, 夹杂物等级, 冲击性能, MnS, TiN

Abstract: Under the influence of chemical composition and production process, MnS and TiN inclusions are easy to appear in 15MnB steel. The influence of S and Ti elements on the generation of inclusions and the impact performance of the 15MnB steel were studied through testing the steel with different S and Ti element content and with the same forging, rolling and heat treatment processes. The microstructure and inclusions of the specimen were analyzed by using optical microscope, and the chemical composition in different types inclusions was identified by using SEM and EDS. The results show that the impact performance of the 15MnB steel is the best when the S element content ≤0.0029% and the Ti element content ≤0.03%. The number and size of inclusions formed in the steel are both small, and the stability of impact performance of the steel increases with the decrease of its content when the S element content ≤0.0029%. A large amount of TiN with large size forms in the steel resulting in a significant reduction in the impact performance of the steel when the Ti element content ≥0.06%. In order to obtain good and stable impact performance, it is suggested that the species and grade of inclusions should be strictly controlled in the industrial production of 15MnB steel: inclusions of class D (thin series) ≤ grade 1.0, TiN inclusion ≤ grade 0.5, and no other types of inclusions.

Key words: 15MnB steel, inclusion, grade of inclusion, impact performance, MnS, TiN

中图分类号:

TG142

杨志荣, 闫德胜, 杨怀君. 夹杂物对15MnB钢冲击性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(11): 32-37.

Yang Zhirong, Yan Desheng, Yang Huaijun. Effect of inclusions on impact performance of 15MnB steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(11): 32-37.

参考文献

[1]刘耀中, 刘彦庆, 刘静华. 15MnB钢强韧化新工艺及其机理研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 1990, 39(4): 115-121.
Liu Yaozhong, Liu Yanqing, Liu Jinghua. Strengthening-toughening process of 15MnB steel and its mechanism[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 1990, 39(4): 115-121.
[2]王世亮. 15MnB钢低碳马氏体的回火转变[J]. 金属热处理, 1978, 3(2): 21-27.
[3]盈亮, 余洋, 戴明华, 等. 热冲压快速冷却工艺对22MnB5钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2015, 40(1): 35-38.
Ying Liang, Yu Yang, Dai Minghua, et al. Influence of hot stamping RCP process on microstructure and properties of 22MnB5 steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2015, 40(1): 35-38.
[4]汪思敏, 栾道成, 王正云, 等. 汽车用22MnB5与26MnB5钢组织性能对比[J]. 金属热处理, 2019, 44(6): 38-42.
Wang Simin, Luan Daocheng, Wang Zhengyun, et al. Comparative on microstructure and properties of 22MnB5 and 26MnB5 steel for automobile[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(6): 38-42.
[5]王吉应, 朱帅帅, 李琦, 等. 淬火温度对热成型22MnB5马氏体钢组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(9): 75-79.
Wang Jiying, Zhu Shuaishuai, Li Qi, et al. Effect of quenching temperature on microstructure and properties of thermoformed 22MnB5 martensitic steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(9): 75-79.
[6]Mu Y H, Wang B Y, Zhou J, et al. Influences of hot stamping parameters on mechanical properties and microstructure of 30MnB5 and 22MnB5 quenched in flat die[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2018, 25(4): 736-746.
[7]Haslberger P, Turk C, Babinsky K, et al. Boron grain boundary segregation in a heat treatable steel[J]. BHM Berg-und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte, 2015, 160(5): 204-208.
[8]程俊业, 赵爱民, 陈银莉, 等. 回火温度对淬火后30MnB5热成形钢组织与性能影响[J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2013, 35(9): 1150-1157.
Cheng Junye, Zhao Aimin, Chen Yinli, et al. Effect of tempering temperature on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 30MnB5 hot stamping steel after quenching[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2013, 35(9): 1150-1157.
[9]王春芳, 李文成, 李继康. 钢中非金属夹杂物及对性能的影响[J]. 物理测试, 2018, 36(4): 25-29.
Wang Chunfang, Li Wencheng, Li Jikang. Non-metallic inclusion and its effect on property of steel[J]. Physics Examination and Testing, 2018, 36(4): 25-29.
[10]吕建刚, 肖李鹏. 钢中非金属夹杂物及其金相检验[J]. 理化检验(物理分册), 2015, 51(4): 229-233.
Lü Jiangang, Xiao Lipeng. Non-metallic inclusions in steel and their metallographic examination[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis (Part A: Physical Testing), 2015, 51(4): 229-233.
[11]李建军, 辛雪倩, 刘琦, 等. 影响钢中非金属夹杂物的关键因素的研究[J]. 大型铸锻件, 2019(1): 13-14.
Li Jianjun, Xin Xueqian, Liu Qi, et al. Research on key factors affecting non-metallic inclusions in steel[J]. Heavy Castings and Forgings, 2019(1): 13-14.
[12]冯士超, 潘秀兰, 王艳红, 等. 洁净钢脱氧技术现状及发展[J]. 炼钢, 2011, 27(2): 74-77.
Feng Shichao, Pan Xiulan, Wang Yanhong, et al. Status quo and progress of deoxidation technology for clean steel[J]. Steelmaking, 2011, 27(2): 74-77.
[13]郑万, 齐盼盼, 沈星, 等. 低碳低硫钢中MnS析出行为分析[J]. 武汉科技大学学报, 2016, 39(4): 241-247.
Zheng Wan, Qi Panpan, Shen Xing, et al. Precipitation behavior of MnS in low-carbon low-sulfur steel[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2016, 39(4): 241-247.
[14]黄野, 杨晓江, 王峰, 等. 不同冷却条件下钢中MnS夹杂物析出特性的研究[J]. 工业加热, 2016, 45(1): 18-21.
Huang Ye, Yang Xiaojiang, Wang Feng, et al. Study on the precipitation characteristics of MnS inclusions in steel during different cooling conditions[J]. Industrial Heating, 2016, 45(1): 18-21.
[15]田钱仁. GCr15轴承钢中TiN夹杂物的析出与演变机制[D]. 鞍山: 辽宁科技大学, 2019.
Tian Qianren. Precipitation and evolution mechanism of TiN inclusion in GCr15 bearing steel[D]. Anshan: University of Science and Technology Liaoning, 2019.
[16]张旭东, 鲍俭. 钢中不同氧含量对含S钢的MnS夹杂物影响[J]. 现代冶金, 2019, 47(3): 9-11.
[17]段丽飞, 周海. 钢中非金属夹杂物与金相鉴定分析[J]. 中国金属通报, 2019(4): 236-237.
[18]刘艳英. 钢中非金属夹杂物及其金相检验[J]. 冶金与材料, 2018, 38(4): 41-42.
[19] 范炜, 韩新利, 张华佳, 等. GB/T 10561—2005与ASTM E45-2013对钢中非金属夹杂物评定的异同[J]. 焊管, 2016, 39(3): 65-68.
Fan Wei, Han Xinli, Zhang Huajia, et al. Similarties and differences for non-metallic inclusions evaluation in steel in GB/T 10561—2005 and ASTM E45-2013[J]. Welded Pipe and Tube, 2016, 39(3): 65-68.