喷射成形7055高强铝合金的热处理工艺优化及其应用

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.01.039

金属热处理 ›› 2022, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 239-244.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2022.01.039

喷射成形7055高强铝合金的热处理工艺优化及其应用

王佳慧¹, 陈文浩¹, 张玉², 江卓奥¹, 王庆航¹, 赵玲玉¹

1.扬州大学机械工程学院, 江苏扬州 225127;
2.江苏豪然喷射成形合金有限公司, 江苏镇江 212009

收稿日期:2021-10-20 修回日期:2021-12-06 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-02-18
通讯作者: 赵玲玉,讲师,博士,E-mail:lingyuzhao@yzu.edu.cn
作者简介:王佳慧(2002—),女,主要研究方向为轻合金变形行为,E-mail:1138241632@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(51901202)

Optimization of heat treatment process of spray-formed 7055 high strength aluminum alloy and its application

Wang Jiahui¹, Chen Wenhao¹, Zhang Yu², Jiang Zhuoao¹, Wang Qinghang¹, Zhao Lingyu¹

1. College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou Jiangsu 225127, China;
2. Jiangsu Haoran Spray Forming Alloy Co., Ltd., Zhenjiang Jiangsu 212009, China

Received:2021-10-20 Revised:2021-12-06 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于两次挤压处理后的喷射成形7055铝合金,采用SEM、光学显微镜、硬度仪和拉伸试验机等分析手段研究了试验合金在不同时效工艺下的组织和性能。结果表明,相较于单级时效工艺,经过120 ℃×6 h+160 ℃×2 h双级时效处理后,析出相呈短棒状均匀分布于基体,其沿长度方向上的平均尺寸为500 nm,宽度方向平均尺寸为10 nm,时效峰值硬度达196.4 HV0.05。采用双级时效工艺处理的试验合金在298、398、498和598 K的抗拉强度分别为855、792、688和360 MPa,断后伸长率分别为14%、11%、9%和8%。采用该双级时效处理工艺处理的喷射成形7055铝合金应用于轮毂紧固件产品的制备,并对其进行硫酸阳极氧化处理,可使得紧固件试样同时兼具高强度、高硬度以及高耐蚀性能,有望得到更广泛的应用。

关键词: 7055铝合金, 喷射成形, 双级时效, 显微组织, 力学性能

Abstract: Based on the spray-formed 7055 aluminum alloy after twice extrusion treatment, the microstructure and properties of the tested alloy under different aging processes were studied by means of SEM, optical microscope, hardness tester and tensile testing machine. The results show that compared with the single-stage aging process, after two-stage aging treatment at 120 ℃ for 6 h and at 160 ℃ for 2 h, the precipitates are uniformly distributed in the matrix with shape of short rod, which the average size along the length and width direction is 500 nm and 10 nm, respectively, and the aging peak hardness is 196.4 HV0.05. The tensile strength of the tested alloy treated by two-stage aging process at 298, 398, 498 and 598 K is 855, 792, 688 and 360 MPa, respectively, and the elongation after fracture is 14%, 11%, 9% and 8%, respectively. The spray-formed 7055 aluminum alloy treated by the two-stage aging treatment process is applied to the preparation of hub fastener products, and is subjected to sulfuric acid anodizing treatment, which can make the fastener specimens have high strength, high hardness and high corrosion resistance at the same time, and it is expected to be more widely used.

Key words: 7055 aluminum alloy, spray-formed, two-stage aging, microstructure, mechanical properties

中图分类号:

TG146.2

王佳慧, 陈文浩, 张玉, 江卓奥, 王庆航, 赵玲玉. 喷射成形7055高强铝合金的热处理工艺优化及其应用[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(1): 239-244.

Wang Jiahui, Chen Wenhao, Zhang Yu, Jiang Zhuoao, Wang Qinghang, Zhao Lingyu. Optimization of heat treatment process of spray-formed 7055 high strength aluminum alloy and its application[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(1): 239-244.

参考文献

[1]Zuo Jinrong, Hou Longgang, Shu Xuedao, et al. Investigation of deformation induced precipitation and the related microstructure evolution of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy[J]. Materials Research Express, 2020, 7(10): 106529.
[2]Adrien J, Maire E, Estevez R, et al. Influence of the thermomechanical treatment on the microplastic behaviour of a wrought AlZnMgCu alloy[J]. Acta Materialia, 2004, 52(6): 1653-1661.
[3]Duchaussoy A, Sauvage X, Deschamps A, et al. Complex interactions between precipitation, grain growth and recrystallization in a severely deformed Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy and consequences on the mechanical behavior[J]. Materialia, 2021, 15: 101028.
[4]Wang T, Huang Y, Yang L, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of 7055 Al alloy prepared under different sintering conditions using powder by-products[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2020, 805: 140562.
[5]Yu H, Wang M, Sheng X, et al. Microstructure and tensile properties of large-size 7055 aluminum billets fabricated by spray forming rapid solidification technology[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2013, 578: 208-214.
[6]Zhao L, Xin Y, Wu Y, et al. The texture dependence of strength in slip and twinning predominant deformations of Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2018, 717: 34-40.
[7]Zhang P, Wang Y. Effects of heat treatment on the nanoscale precipitation behavior of 7055 aluminum alloy under dynamic shock[J]. Vacuum, 2018, 152: 150-155.
[8]Li Y, Zhang Y, Han S, et al. Research on the effect of aging time on the microstructure of 7055 aluminum alloy[J]. Vacuum, 2019, 171: 108944.
[9]王贵会, 喷射成形7055铝合金应力腐蚀与电化学腐蚀性能研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏科技大学, 2012.
[10]甘卫平, 范洪涛, 许可勤, 等. Al-Zn-Mg-Cu系高强铝合金研究进展[J]. 铝加工, 2003, 3: 6-12.
Gan Weiping, Fan Hongtao, Xu Keqin, et al. Study progress of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu series high-strength aluminum alloys[J]. Aluminium Fabrication, 2003, 3: 6-12.
[11]She H, Shu D, Dong A, et al. Relationship of particle stimulated nucleation, recrystallization and mechanical properties responding to Fe and Si contents in hot-extruded 7055 aluminum alloys[J]. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2019, 35(11): 2570-2581.
[12]Liu S D, Wang S L, Ye L Y, et al. Flow behavior and microstructure evolution of 7055 aluminum alloy impacted at high strain rates[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2016, 677: 203-210.
[13]Khan M A, Wang Y, Afifi M A, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of an Al-Zn-Cu-Mg alloy processed by hot forming processes followed by heat treatments[J]. Materials Characterization, 2019, 157: 109901.
[14]陈亮, 陈松, 冒爱荣. 铝合金阳极氧化工艺条件的优化[J]. 广州化工, 2015, 43(23): 128-129.
Chen Liang, Chen Song, Mao Airong. Optimization of process conditions of aluminum alloy anodic oxidation[J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2015, 43(23): 128-129.
[15]Ji M, Li W, Liu H C, et al. Effect of titanium sol on sulfuric-citric acids anodizing of 7150 aluminum alloy[J]. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2020, 19: 100479.
[16]Machado T V, Dick P A, Knrnschild G H, et al. The effect of different carboxylic acids on the sulfuric acid anodizing of AA2024[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2019, 383: 125283.
[17]Ding Z V. Mechanistic study of thin film sulfuric acid anodizing rate difference between Al2024 T3 and Al6061 T6[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2019, 357: 280-288.

喷射成形7055高强铝合金的热处理工艺优化及其应用

Optimization of heat treatment process of spray-formed 7055 high strength aluminum alloy and its application

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张子延, 陈君, 陈晓亚, 李全安, 刘建鑫. 固溶时效处理对Mg-4Sm-3Gd-0.5Zr合金显微组织和耐蚀性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 10-16.
[2]	梁恩溥, 徐乐, 杨勇, 王毛球. 添加Al、Cu对40CrNi3MoV钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 17-23.
[3]	祁晓亮, 李岩, 定巍, 赵增武. 含Al中锰TRIP钢原始组织对临界退火后组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 24-29.
[4]	陈保安, 张静媛, 祝志祥, 韩钰, 潘学东, 张磊, 陈素红. 化学成分对高强Al-Mg-Si合金组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 30-38.
[5]	陈连生, 张露友, 田亚强, 杨子旋, 李红斌, 潘红波, 魏英立. 低碳高强舰船用钢的CCT曲线及其组织性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 63-68.
[6]	王云龙, 余伟, 张昳, 史佳新, 李明辉. 奥氏体化温度对贝氏体钢等温转变及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 80-85.
[7]	骆再斌, 范子泽, 彭振. 轻质高熵合金的研究进展[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 100-107.
[8]	吕杰晟, 宋志刚, 何建国, 丰涵, 郑文杰, 朱玉亮. S32205双相不锈钢冷轧退火组织转变及强塑化机理分析[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 141-145.
[9]	王琪, 吴光亮. 回火温度对1100 MPa级高强钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 146-150.
[10]	孙凯, 陈研, 杨绍斌. 时效温度对激光选区熔化TC21钛合金微观组织及硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 155-158.
[11]	张骥俊, 邢彦锋, 曹菊勇. 超声振动对CMT电弧增材制造铝合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 159-164.
[12]	刘文彬, 乔龙阳, 潘新宇, 程格, 李爱娜, 裴新军. 淬火温度对刀剪用M390粉末冶金不锈钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 189-195.
[13]	王瑞琴, 葛鹏, 廖强, 侯鹏, 刘宇. 固溶冷却方式对短时用高温钛合金板材组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 196-198.
[14]	王绍灼, 孟晗, 王芬, 樊海卫, 李燕, 唐超. 改善低氧TC4-LC及重熔TC4钛合金性能的热处理工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 204-207.
[15]	陈强, 陈林芳, 杨明华. 18CrNiMo7-6钢的可控气氛高温渗碳工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(4): 231-239.