不锈钢表面激光熔覆镍基合金涂层的数值模拟与试验

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2023.01.040

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为改善不锈钢表面熔覆质量,探究能量密度对不锈钢表面激光熔覆镍基合金涂层质量的影响,利用Visual-Environment数值模拟软件,基于高斯体热源模型,通过改变激光功率获得不同的能量密度输入,对304不锈钢表面激光熔覆Ni35合金涂层的过程进行了数值模拟分析,并采用相应能量密度对应的激光功率进行试验验证。模拟结果表明,激光功率为900 W,扫描速度为6 mm/s,光斑半径为1 mm时,对应的激光能量密度为75 J/mm²,所得温度分布云图峰值温度2459.55 ℃,在较合理的温度范围内(2400~2600 ℃)。试验验证结果显示,该工艺参数下熔覆层宏观形貌较好且微观组织致密,基体与涂层间形成了良好的冶金结合。

关键词: 能量密度, 激光熔覆, 温度云图, 不锈钢, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to improve the cladding quality of stainless steel surface and explore the influence of energy densities on the cladding quality of nickel-based alloy coating prepared by laser cladding on stainless steel surface, the numerical simulation of laser cladding of the Ni35 alloy coating on the 304 stainless steel was carried out by using Visual-Environment software and based on Gaussian body heat source model by varying the laser power to obtain different energy density inputs, and the laser power corresponding to the energy density was used for the experiment verification. The simulation results show that when the laser power is 900 W, the scanning speed is 6 mm/s and the laser spot radius is 1 mm, the laser energy density is 75 J/mm², then the obtained peak temperature of the simulated temperature distribution cloud map is 2459.55 ℃, which is in the reasonable temperature range(2400-2600 ℃). Under these parameters, the experiment verification results show that the macromorphology of the coating is fine, the microstructure is compact, and a good metallurgical bonding is formed between the coating and the substrate.

Key words: energy density, laser cladding, temperature cloud map, stainless steel, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TG456.7

王冰涛, 熊宗慧, 孙耀宁. 不锈钢表面激光熔覆镍基合金涂层的数值模拟与试验[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(1): 232-237.

Wang Bingtao, Xiong Zonghui, Sun Yaoning. Numerical simulation and experiments of laser cladding of nickel-based alloy coating on stainless steel surface[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2023, 48(1): 232-237.

参考文献

[1]曹凤国. 激光加工[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2015.
[2]赫庆坤, 宋立新. 不同厚度基体激光熔覆应力分析[J]. 激光杂志, 2018, 39(1): 60-63.
He Qingkun, Song Lixin. Stress analysis of laser cladding of substrates with different thicknesses[J]. Laser Journal, 2018, 39(1): 60-63.
[3]王贤才, 张亚普, 柴蓉霞. 27SiMn钢表面激光熔覆304不锈钢的组织和性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(4): 188-193.
Wang Xiancai, Zhang Yapu, Chai Rongxia. Microstructure and properties of 27SiMn steel surface laser coated with 304 stainless steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(4): 188-193.
[4]Zhang P P, Chu J Q, Qu G, et al. Numerical simulation of convex shape beam spot on stress field of plasma-sprayed MCrAlY coating during laser cladding process[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 118(1): 207-217.
[5]蔡春波, 李美艳, 韩彬, 等. 不同预热温度下宽带激光熔覆铁基涂层数值模拟[J]. 应用激光, 2017, 37(1): 66-71.
Cai Chunbo, Li Meiyan, Han Bin, et al. Numerical simulation iron-based cladding coating with wide-band laser at different preheating temperatures[J]. Applied Lasers, 2017, 37(1): 66-71.
[6]宋建丽, 李永堂, 邓琦林, 等. 激光熔覆成形技术的研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2010, 46(14): 29-39.
Song Jianli, Li Yongtang, Deng Qilin, et al. Research progress of laser cladding forming technology[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 46(14): 29-39.
[7]李金华, 安学甲, 姚芳萍, 等. H13钢激光熔覆Ni基涂层热应力循环的仿真研究[J]. 中国激光, 2021, 48(10): 33-40.
Li Jinhua, An Xuejia, Yao Fangping, et al. Simulation study of thermal stress cycles in laser clad Ni-based coatings on H13 steel[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(10): 33-40.
[8]张天刚, 张倩, 姚波, 等. TC4表面Ni基激光熔覆层温度场和应力场的数值模拟[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2021, 58(3): 220-228.
Zhang Tiangang, Zhang Qian, Yao Bo, et al. Numerical simulation of temperature field and stress field of Ni-based laser cladding layer on TC4 surface[J]. Laser and Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(3): 220-228.
[9]Guo S R, Yu J H, Cui L J, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental investigation of coaxiality change of laser cladding rotor shaft[J]. Optical Engineering, 2021, 60(12): 124106.
[10]Jia Y, Wang K, Lou L. Temperature field distribution for laser cladding on axially symmetrical parts[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 677(2): 022083.
[11]Song M, Wu L, Liu J, et al. Effects of laser cladding on crack resistance improvement for aluminum alloy used in aircraft skin[J]. Optics Laser Technology, 2021, 133: 106531.
[12]王鹏飞, 杨坤, 陈明智, 等. 倾斜基板激光熔覆GH3536熔池形貌的仿真与试验研究[J]. 中国激光, 2021, 48(10): 210-221.
Wang Pengfei, Yang Kun, Chen Mingzhi, et al. Simulation and experimental research on the GH3536 molten pool laser cladding on inclined substrate[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(10): 210-221.
[13]谢林圯, 师文庆, 吴腾, 等. 曲面基底工件激光熔覆温度场与应力场数值模拟[J]. 表面技术, 2022, 51(3): 296-303, 325.
Xie Linyi, Shi Wenqing, Wu Teng, et al. Numerical simulation of temperature field and stress field of laser cladding on curved substrate workpiece[J]. Surface Technology, 2022, 51(3): 296-303, 325.
[14]苏德发, 许磊. 不锈钢表面激光熔覆FeCr涂层热行为数值模拟[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 34(8): 128-133.
Su Defa, Xu Lei. Numerical simulation of thermal behavior of FeCr coating on stainless steel surface by laser melting[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Sciences), 2020, 34(8): 128-133.
[15]詹明杰. 316L不锈钢激光增材再制造温度场及应力场的试验及数值模拟研究[D]. 南京, 东南大学, 2019.
Zhan Mingjie. Experimental and numerical simulation research of temperature field and stress field in 316L stainless steel by laser addictive remanufacturing[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2019.
[16]李亚敏, 咬登治, 范福杰. 激光熔覆718合金工艺参数优化的数值模拟研究[J]. 应用激光, 2018, 38(6): 920-926.
Li Yamin, Yao Dengzhi, Fan Fujie. Numerical simulation study on the optimization of process parameters for laser cladding of 718 alloy[J]. Applied Lasers, 2018, 38(6): 920-926.
[17]郭卫, 张亚普, 柴蓉霞, 等. 27SiMn钢表面激光熔覆304不锈钢数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 应用激光, 2019, 39(1): 35-41.
Guo Wei, Zhang Yapu, Chai Rongxia, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental study of laser cladding 304 stainless steel on 27SiMn steel[J]. Applied Lasers, 2019, 39(1): 35-41.
[18]韩晨阳, 孙耀宁, 王国建, 等. 不锈钢冷轧辊激光表面修复工艺研究[J]. 应用激光, 2020, 40(4): 598-604.
Han Chenyang, Sun Yaoning, Wang Guojian, et al. Study on laser surface repair technology of stainless steel cold roll[J]. Applied Lasers, 2020, 40(4): 598-604.