Q&P工艺对1000 MPa级高强钢组织与性能的影响

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.08.011

金属热处理 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (8): 67-73.DOI: 10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.08.011

Q&P工艺对1000 MPa级高强钢组织与性能的影响

郭呈宇¹, 张哲², 张弛¹, 代春朵¹, 侯华兴¹, 李江文¹

1.鞍钢集团北京研究院有限公司, 北京 102211;
2.鞍钢集团钢铁研究院, 辽宁鞍山 114009

收稿日期:2024-02-04 修回日期:2024-06-03 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-09-27
作者简介:郭呈宇(1994—),男,副研究员,博士,主要研究方向为高性能钢低屈强比控制技术,E-mail:guochengyu@ansteel.com.cn
基金资助:
中国交通建设集团科技研发项目

Effect of Q&P process on microstructure and properties of 1000 MPa grade high strength steel

Guo Chengyu¹, Zhang Zhe², Zhang Chi¹, Dai Chunduo¹, Hou Huaxing¹, Li Jiangwen¹

1. Ansteel Beijing Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102211, China;
2. Ansteel Iron and Steel Research Institutes, Anshan Liaoning 114009, China

Received:2024-02-04 Revised:2024-06-03 Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-09-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过扫描电镜组织观察并结合Gleeble热模拟试验,对两种化学成分不同的1000 MPa级高强钢在盐浴Q&P处理过程中的组织转变进行分析,进一步结合力学性能与XRD位错密度计算,分析组织转变对力学性能的影响。结果表明,试验高强度钢在盐浴Q&P处理过程中发生两阶段相变,盐浴配分过程对第一阶段相变形成的板条马氏体起到回火效果,形成了存在强度差异的复相回火板条马氏体组织,使得两种试验钢屈强比均不高于0.87。随盐浴淬火温度升高,屈服强度与屈强比降低,随配分温度升高,强度和屈强比变化不大。在450 ℃盐浴配分时,板条马氏体组织部分分解,位错密度降低,导致强度明显降低。

关键词: 高强钢, Q&P处理, 组织, 屈强比, 强度

Abstract: Microstructure transformation of two 1000 MPa grade high strength steels with different chemical compositions during salt bath Q&P treatment was analyzed through microstructure observation by scanning electron microscope and Gleeble thermal simulation test. The effect of microstructure transformation on mechanical properties was further analyzed by combining mechanical properties and XRD dislocation density calculation. The results show that two-stage phase transformation occurs during the salt bath Q&P treatment, where the salt-bath partitioning process has a tempering effect on the lath martensite formed in the first phase transformation stage to form a multi-phase tempered lath martensite with different strengths, making the yield ratio of both the tested steels not higher than 0.87. As the salt bath quenching temperature increases, the yield strength and yield ratio decrease, while as the partitioning temperature increases, the strength and yield ratio do not change much. When salt bath partitioned at 450 ℃, the lath martensite structure is partially decomposed and the dislocation density decreases, leading to a significant reduction in the strength.

Key words: high strength steel, Q&P treatment, microstructure, yield ratio, strength

中图分类号:

TG156.31

郭呈宇, 张哲, 张弛, 代春朵, 侯华兴, 李江文. Q&P工艺对1000 MPa级高强钢组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 67-73.

Guo Chengyu, Zhang Zhe, Zhang Chi, Dai Chunduo, Hou Huaxing, Li Jiangwen. Effect of Q&P process on microstructure and properties of 1000 MPa grade high strength steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(8): 67-73.

参考文献

[1]王国栋. 高质量中厚板生产关键共性技术研发现状和前景[J]. 轧钢, 2019, 36(1): 1-8, 30.
Wang Guodong. Status and prospects of research and development of key common technologies for high-quality heavy and medium plate production[J]. Steel Rolling, 2019, 36(1): 1-8, 30.
[2]周成, 赵坦, 叶其斌, 等. 回火温度对1000 MPa级NiCrMoV低碳合金钢微观组织和低温韧性的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(12): 1557-1569.
Zhou Cheng, Zhao Tan, Ye Qibin, et al. Effects of tempering temperature on microstructure and low-temperature toughness of 1000 MPa grade NiCrMoV low carbon alloyed steel[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2022, 58(12): 1557-1569.
[3]张伟锋, 何肖飞, 尉文超, 等. Nb微合金化对Cr-Ni-Mo-V系高强钢组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2023, 48(1): 29-34.
Zhang Weifeng, He Xiaofei, Yu Wenchao, et al. Effect of Nb microalloying on microstructure and mechanical properties of Cr-Ni-Mo-V high-strength steels[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2023, 48(1): 29-34.
[4]史根豪, 朱思远, 王青峰, 等. 12.9级调质耐候螺栓钢的淬火温度优化[J]. 材料热处理学报, 2022, 43(4): 124-130.
Shi Genhao, Zhu Siyuan, Wang Qingfeng, et al. Quenching temperature optimization of grade 12.9 quenched and tempered weathering bolt steel[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2022, 43(4): 124-130.
[5]王皓, 田长亮, 王安, 等. E级钢调质处理后的组织与性能[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(7): 168-176.
Wang Hao, Tian Changliang, Wang An, et al. Microstructure and properties of grade E steel after quenching and tempering treatment[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(7): 168-176.
[6]李鸿斌, 任永峰, 白耀岗, 等. 调质工艺对低碳微合金钢管组织及性能的影响[J]. 焊管, 2023, 46(4): 16-22.
Li Hongbin, Ren Yongfeng, Bai Yaogang, et al. Effect of quenching and tempering process on microstructure and properties of low carbon micro-alloyed steel pipe[J]. Welded Pipe and Tube, 2023, 46(4): 16-22.
[7]李洪楠, 张红梅, 赵大东, 等. 调质热处理对EH47船板钢显微组织的影响[J]. 上海金属, 2021, 43(1): 72-76, 82.
Li Hongnan, Zhang Hongmei, Zhao Dadong, et al. Effect of quenching and tempering processes on microstructure of EH47 hull steel[J]. Shanghai Metals, 2021, 43(1): 72-76, 82.
[8]成慧梅, 冯俊鹏, 孙电强, 等. 调质处理工艺对微合金化Q960E钢70 mm板组织性能的影响[J]. 特殊钢, 2022, 43(5): 78-81.
Cheng Huimei, Feng Junpeng, Sun Dianqiang, et al. Effect of quenching-tempering process on microstructure and properties of micro-alloying Q960E steel 70 mm thickness plate[J]. Special Steel, 2022, 43(5): 78-81.
[9]贾梦云, 韦勇, 章红艳, 等. 调质态Q1100高强钢的微观组织研究[J]. 热加工工艺, 2023, 52(4): 153-156.
Jia Mengyun, Wei Yong, Zhang Hongyan, et al. Study on microstructure of quenching and tempering Q1100 high-strength steel[J]. Hot Working Technology, 2023, 52(4): 153-156
[10]]Zhang J M, Li H, Yang F, et al. Effect of heat treatment process on mechanical properties and microstructure of a 9%Ni steel for large LNG storage tanks[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2013, 22(12): 3867-3871.
[11]赵宏禹, 刘荣佩, 王长军, 等. QLT与QT热处理工艺对9Ni低温钢性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2018, 43(12): 100-104.
Zhao Hongyu, Liu Rongpei, Wang Changjun, et al. Influence of QLT and QT heat treatment process on properties of 9Ni steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2018, 43(12): 100-104.
[12]]Li J, Tan Z L, Zhang M, et al. Effect of intercritical austenitizing temperature during quenching-intercritical quenching-tempering process on toughness of 25Mn2Si2Cr bainitic steel[J]. Steel Research International, 2019, 90: 1800573.
[13]邓伟, 秦小梅. 临界淬火工艺处理高强结构钢Q690GJ的韧化机理[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(12): 247-252.
Deng Wei, Qin Xiaomei. Fracture resistance mechanism of high strength structural steel Q690GJ treated by intercritical quenching process[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(12): 247-252.
[14]]Arun K, Kumar S V, Kumar S A, et al. Effect of quenching and partitioning on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a medium carbon low alloy low silicon (0.3C-1.0Mn-0.4Si-0.6Cr-0.46Ni-0.26Mo) steel[J]. Materials Research Express, 2018, 5(11): 116503.
[15]]Cho L, Seo E J, Cooman B D. Near-Ac₃ austenitized ultra-fine-grained quenching and partitioning (Q&P) steel[J]. Scripta Materialia, 2016, 123: 69-72.
[16]胡家锋, 孙优, 赵卓, 等. Q&P工艺参数对34SiMn2CrNiMo钢组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2023, 51(3): 113-122.
Hu Jiafeng, Sun You, Zhao Zhuo, et al. Effect of Q&P technological parameters on microstructures and mechanical properties of 34SiMn2CrNiMo steel[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2023, 51(3): 113-122.
[17]索忠源, 杜阳, 付立铭, 等. Q&P工艺对5CrMnNiMo超高强度钢组织及性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2022, 47(5): 217-220.
Suo Zhongyuan, Du Yang, Fu Liming, et al. Effect of Q&P process on microstructure and properties of 5CrMnNiMo ultra-high strength steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2022, 47(5): 217-220.
[18]梁校, 罗平, 李贤君, 等. Q&P工艺对22MnB5钢微观组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2020, 45(7): 57-62.
Liang Xiao, Luo Ping, Li Xianjun, et al. Effect of Q＆P process on microstructure and mechanical properties of 22MnB5 steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2020, 45(7): 57-62.
[19]]Speer J, Matlock D K, Cooman B, et al. Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation[J]. Acta Materialia, 2003, 51: 2611-2622.

Q&P工艺对1000 MPa级高强钢组织与性能的影响

Effect of Q&P process on microstructure and properties of 1000 MPa grade high strength steel

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张宏亮, 周春波, 侯燕, 蒋志强. C-Si-Mn系配分钢的研究进展[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 22-30.
[2]	刘运娜, 孙笠灿, 戴观文, 刘献达, 宋仁伯, 张朝磊. 冷却速率和Nb微合金化对25MnV非调质钢组织和硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 31-35.
[3]	曾祥军, 史志铭, 赵鸽, 廉浩, 刘佳成. 轻-重稀土混合添加对Al-Si-Mg合金显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 36-41.
[4]	曹悦, 高雪云, 王海燕, 邢磊, 林鸿亮. 稀土La对含Cu马氏体不锈钢显微组织与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 42-47.
[5]	华文娟, 张建勋. 时效处理对电弧熔丝增材制造2319铝合金性能及断裂行为的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 60-66.
[6]	王堤鹤, 庞启航, 赵星宇, 李维娟, 赵立冬, 史津铭. IQ&P工艺处理高强钢的组织性能及低温C配分[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 74-81.
[7]	臧岩, 朱莹光, 张弛, 安涛, 刘文月. QLT热处理对5.5Ni钢显微组织和拉伸性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 88-93.
[8]	刘静, 赵科, 王丽阁. 退火对Co_xFe₃₅Mn₂₅Cr₁₅Ni₁₀Ti₅高熵合金微观组织及硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 94-101.
[9]	郭昊东, 杨超飞, 孙磊, 张玉祥, 黄冬, 仝智远. 10CrNi8MoV钢的包申格效应及恢复热处理[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 119-123.
[10]	徐锋, 孙强, 孟吉炜. 固溶温度对超低碳15-5PH沉淀硬化不锈钢组织和性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 124-129.
[11]	杨永超, 李玉贵, 赵子钧. 430不锈钢的连续退火工艺[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 130-135.
[12]	张勇, 李如杨, 马青山, 胡效东. 热处理对09MnNiDR低温钢焊接接头组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 136-142.
[13]	曲之国, 张万新, 白学飞, 王东明, 张友建. 模拟焊后热处理对厚规格16MnDR钢板组织性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 147-151.
[14]	周瑞虎, 樊启刚, 曾志鹏. 轴承套圈碳氮共渗工艺的改进[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 152-155.
[15]	孙昭琦, 李涛, 韩强, 张行刚, 白岩松, 高志敏. 淬火工艺对28MnCrMoRE油井管钢显微组织及硬度的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2024, 49(8): 160-164.