Effect of heat treatment and Cr content on fatigue crack growth of pearlitic rail steels

doi:10.13251/j.issn.0254-6051.2024.04.010

Abstract

Abstract: The fatigue properties of two pearlitic rail steel with different Cr contents were determined using a SincoTec electromagnetic resonance high-frequency fatigue testing machine. The effects of heat treatment process and the Cr contents on the fatigue crack propagation behavior of the rail steels were studied by analyzing the fatigue crack propagation rate curves, fracture morphologies, inclusions and precipitates at the fracture surfaces. The results show that the optimal heat treatment process for the low-Cr steel is cooling at a rate of 8 ℃/s to 560 ℃ and then isothermal holding for 30 s, which increases the fatigue life of the low-Cr steel from 788 000 cycles in as-rolled state to 914 000 cycles, by 16.0%. While under the same heat treatment conditions, the fatigue life of the high-Cr steel is increased from 812 000 cycles in as-rolled state to 1 043 000 cycles, by 28.4%. The fatigue performance improvement of the tested steels resulted by optimized heat treatment process and higher Cr content is attributed to the significant reduction in the interlamellar spacing and cluster size of pearlite. On one hand, the microstructure refinement increases the crack propagation resistance, reduces the distance between fatigued striations, and increases the number of fatigue steps. On the other hand, it hinders the primary crack growth, and increases the grain orientations to obtain higher possibility of secondary cracks. Moreover, the higher Cr content promotes (Fe, Cr)₃C second-phase particle precipitation during stage II cracking zone, which impedes dislocation motion and thus reduces crack propagation rate during fatigue loading.

Key words: pearlitic rail steel, heat treatment, Cr content, fatigue crack growth

CLC Number:

TG111

Wang Dongmei, Jiang Hongli, Wang Yeshuang, Liu Dong, Liu Chang, Chen Lin. Effect of heat treatment and Cr content on fatigue crack growth of pearlitic rail steels[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2024, 49(4): 55-61.

References

[1]郭俊. 轮轨滚动接触疲劳损伤机理研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2006.
Guo Jun. Study on mechanism of wheel-rail rolling contact fatigue and damage[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006.
[2]张银花, 周清跃, 鲍磊, 等. 国内外高速铁路钢轨性能对比研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2015, 36(4): 20-26.
Zhang Yinhua, Zhou Qingyue, Bao Lei, et al.Comparative study on rail performance of high-speed railway at home and abroad[J]. China Railway Science, 2015, 36(4): 20-26.
[3]任安超. 高强度耐蚀钢轨的研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2012.
Ren Anchao. A research on high strength corrosion resistant rail[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2012.
[4]Kang C, Schneider S, Wenner M, et al. Experimental investigation on the fatigue behaviour of rails in the transverse direction[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 272: 121666.
[5]王东梅, 赵磊城, 陈林, 等. 淬火冷速对过共析轨钢中珠光体组织的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(3): 12-17.
Wang Dongmei, Zhao Leicheng, Chen Lin, et al. Effect of quenching cooling rate on pearlite microstructure of hypereutectoid rail steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(3): 12-17.
[6]姚冬. 不同强度等级珠光体钢轨韧性指标对比分析[J]. 铁道建筑, 2018, 58(7): 1-4.
Yao Dong. Comparative analysis of toughness indexes of pearlite rail with different strength grades[J]. Railway Engineering, 2018, 58(7): 1-4.
[7]陈林, 王慧军, 郭飞翔. 淬火微观组织对重轨钢疲劳裂纹扩展速率的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2017, 31(14): 109-112.
Chen Lin, Wang Huijun, Guo Feixiang. Effect of quenching microstructure on fatigue crack growth rate of heavy rail steel[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(14): 109-112.
[8]崔健伟. 过共析钢轨力学性能及疲劳裂纹扩展行为研究[D]. 包头: 内蒙古科技大学, 2020.
Cui Jianwei. A study on mechanical properties and fatigue crack propagation behavior of hypereutectoid steel rail[D]. Baotou: Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, 2020.
[9]王明明. 高强度钢轨钢成分设计及组织、性能研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2018.
Wang Mingming. A study on composition design, structure and properties of high strength rail steel[D]. Qinhuangdao:Yanshan University, 2018.
[10]周庆飞. 75 kg/m重载用钢轨淬火工艺及疲劳裂纹扩展行为研究[D]. 包头: 内蒙古科技大学, 2019.
Zhou Qingfei. A study on quenching process and fatigue crack propagation behavior of 75 kg/m heavy duty rail[D]. Baotou: Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, 2019.
[11]拉乌金. 铬钢热处理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1959.
[12]张旭, 何文超, 魏鑫鸿. 深冷处理对H13钢组织和热疲劳性能的影响[J]. 金属热处理, 2021, 46(10): 81-85.
Zhang Xu, He Wenchao, Wei Xinhong. Effect of cryogenic treatment on microstructure and thermal fatigue properties of H13 steel[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2021, 46(10): 81-85.
[13]王业双. U76CrRE热处理钢轨组织及疲劳断裂行为研究[D]. 包头: 内蒙古科技大学, 2022.
Wang Yeshuang. A research on structure and fatigue fracture behavior of U76CrRE heat-treated rail[D]. Baotou: Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, 2022.
[14]孙淑华. 显微组织对珠光体钢疲劳裂纹扩展速率的影响[J]. 物理测试, 2004, 2(3): 7-10.
Sun Shuhua. Effect of microstructure on fatigue crack propagation rate of pearlite steel[J]. Physical Test, 2004, 2(3): 7-10.
[15]Królicka A, Lesiuk G, Radwański K, et al. Comparison of fatigue crack growth rate: pearlitic rail versus bainitic rail[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2021, 149: 106280.
[16]Bai Jinbo, Chen Siyi. Secondary cracking during surface crack growth under tensile fatigue loading[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1988, 30(2): 161-167.
[17]Cen Yaodong, Chen Lin, Dong Rui. et al. Effect of quenching rate on fatigue crack growth of hypereutectoid rail steel[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2020, 55(30): 15033-15042.